<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Libertarian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/11/29/the-new-libertarian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/11/29/the-new-libertarian/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/11/29/the-new-libertarian/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelibertypapers.org/2005/11/29/the-new-libertarian/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see what his next essay states.  I always look forward to the New Libertarian and I did read that article.  I will freely admit I am not sure where I fit into the scenario of what you state is the classic liberal being a small &quot;l&quot; Libertarian.  It&#039;s apparent I have alot to still learn when it comes to that aspect of the discussion.  


Brad Warbiany had an article &quot;Peak Liberty&quot; that I found very interesting as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see what his next essay states.  I always look forward to the New Libertarian and I did read that article.  I will freely admit I am not sure where I fit into the scenario of what you state is the classic liberal being a small &#8220;l&#8221; Libertarian.  It&#8217;s apparent I have alot to still learn when it comes to that aspect of the discussion.  </p>
<p>Brad Warbiany had an article &#8220;Peak Liberty&#8221; that I found very interesting as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/11/29/the-new-libertarian/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelibertypapers.org/2005/11/29/the-new-libertarian/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The difference between James Madison and Michael Badnarik is that Madison was willing to compromise if it moved him towards his goal. The point is to move towards the goal, not sit in coffee houses and talk about the beauty of the goal. And the goal is more freedom, more liberty, more prosperity. It is not perfection of those things. Perfection is not possible. Rather, it is the enemy of the good. Let’s work towards achieving the good.&lt;/i&gt;

Amen, brother.

I think its time I finally pinned that article why I&#039;m not a Libertarian Party member.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The difference between James Madison and Michael Badnarik is that Madison was willing to compromise if it moved him towards his goal. The point is to move towards the goal, not sit in coffee houses and talk about the beauty of the goal. And the goal is more freedom, more liberty, more prosperity. It is not perfection of those things. Perfection is not possible. Rather, it is the enemy of the good. Let’s work towards achieving the good.</i></p>
<p>Amen, brother.</p>
<p>I think its time I finally pinned that article why I&#8217;m not a Libertarian Party member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

