<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Tolerance the same as Acceptance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/12/05/is-tolerance-the-same-as-acceptance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/12/05/is-tolerance-the-same-as-acceptance/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/12/05/is-tolerance-the-same-as-acceptance/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelibertypapers.org/?p=72#comment-124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, David, I actually debated about bringing in the term &quot;open-minded&quot;.  Personally, I think of myself as being open-minded in the true meaning of the phrase (i.e. as I consider myself &quot;liberal&quot; in the classical sense, but not at all as the currently in vogue usage) but I&#039;ve enough sense to realize that if you leave your mind too open, you may be in danger of losing some of it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, David, I actually debated about bringing in the term &#8220;open-minded&#8221;.  Personally, I think of myself as being open-minded in the true meaning of the phrase (i.e. as I consider myself &#8220;liberal&#8221; in the classical sense, but not at all as the currently in vogue usage) but I&#8217;ve enough sense to realize that if you leave your mind too open, you may be in danger of losing some of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rossie</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/12/05/is-tolerance-the-same-as-acceptance/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rossie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelibertypapers.org/?p=72#comment-123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like what I see.  Related to this topic: the overuse and abuse of the term &quot;open-minded,&quot; which many also translate as accepting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what I see.  Related to this topic: the overuse and abuse of the term &#8220;open-minded,&#8221; which many also translate as accepting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/12/05/is-tolerance-the-same-as-acceptance/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelibertypapers.org/?p=72#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear hear, Brad.  That&#039;s just how I see life as well - but I&#039;m afraid we&#039;re in the minority group, LOL!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear hear, Brad.  That&#8217;s just how I see life as well &#8211; but I&#8217;m afraid we&#8217;re in the minority group, LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/12/05/is-tolerance-the-same-as-acceptance/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelibertypapers.org/?p=72#comment-115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always seen the same thing.  This is especially true when you talk about those who engage in &quot;alternative lifestyles&quot; or &quot;ethnic politics&quot;.  When they talk about &quot;tolerance&quot;, they&#039;re not suggesting that you should allow them to do what you think is not right, they&#039;re asking that you validate their choice.  They&#039;re not asking for tolerance, they&#039;re asking for downright celebration.  They don&#039;t ask you to evaluate them as an individual, they ask you to treat them highly because of the &quot;group&quot; they identify with.

Now, I&#039;m a pretty laid-back guy.  I keep to myself, and take people for what they are.  I know that idiots come in all shapes, colors, and sizes, and so I do my best to evaluate people based on their individual traits, not on their interest group or their &quot;lifestyle choice.&quot;  

In all reality, I&#039;m not a moralist in the sense of how people live their lives.  Honestly, I don&#039;t care much at all.  The friends I keep, regardless of how they may or may not be &quot;diverse&quot;, are not the type who ask me to celebrate their diversity, they ask me to be a friend.  And that&#039;s the way I like it.

I think the pendulum used to swing too far to the side of discrimination, where people treated others unfairly because of their &quot;group&quot;.  But I think it has now swung the opposite direction, where we have ceased to be able to speak honestly in the name of political correctness.  The hope of those of us who would like to see a truly colorblind society is not one where your &quot;group&quot; is treated in any particular way, but where you are not seen as a member of a &quot;group&quot; at all.  I don&#039;t need to see anyone&#039;s group membership card to know whether I should treat them with respect, I will find that out through dealing with them as an individual.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always seen the same thing.  This is especially true when you talk about those who engage in &#8220;alternative lifestyles&#8221; or &#8220;ethnic politics&#8221;.  When they talk about &#8220;tolerance&#8221;, they&#8217;re not suggesting that you should allow them to do what you think is not right, they&#8217;re asking that you validate their choice.  They&#8217;re not asking for tolerance, they&#8217;re asking for downright celebration.  They don&#8217;t ask you to evaluate them as an individual, they ask you to treat them highly because of the &#8220;group&#8221; they identify with.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m a pretty laid-back guy.  I keep to myself, and take people for what they are.  I know that idiots come in all shapes, colors, and sizes, and so I do my best to evaluate people based on their individual traits, not on their interest group or their &#8220;lifestyle choice.&#8221;  </p>
<p>In all reality, I&#8217;m not a moralist in the sense of how people live their lives.  Honestly, I don&#8217;t care much at all.  The friends I keep, regardless of how they may or may not be &#8220;diverse&#8221;, are not the type who ask me to celebrate their diversity, they ask me to be a friend.  And that&#8217;s the way I like it.</p>
<p>I think the pendulum used to swing too far to the side of discrimination, where people treated others unfairly because of their &#8220;group&#8221;.  But I think it has now swung the opposite direction, where we have ceased to be able to speak honestly in the name of political correctness.  The hope of those of us who would like to see a truly colorblind society is not one where your &#8220;group&#8221; is treated in any particular way, but where you are not seen as a member of a &#8220;group&#8221; at all.  I don&#8217;t need to see anyone&#8217;s group membership card to know whether I should treat them with respect, I will find that out through dealing with them as an individual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
