Thoughts, essays, and writings on Liberty. Written by the heirs of Patrick Henry.

“Governments…formed simply by the consent or agreement of the strongest part…will act in concert in subjecting the weaker party to their dominion. And the despotism, and tyranny, and injustice of these governments consist in that very fact.”     Lysander Spooner

December 8, 2005

Renewing The Patriot Act

by Robert

Despite their faults, the ACLU is quite rightly questioning the authority of the US Government where individual liberty is concerned. Specifically, they have been relentless in their opposition to the Patriot Act, legislation that all but ignores the Fourth Amendment and the Viagra online presumption of innocence.

Under the Patriot Act, the FBI can demand the disclosure of personal records about innocent people without getting approval from a judge. Simply by issuing a National Security Letter, the FBI can force Internet service providers, universities and other institutions to turn over customer records.

Even more disturbing, anyone who receives an NSL is gagged forever from telling anyone that the FBI demanded records. Secrecy surrounding NSLs has made it difficult for the public and Congress to know just how the FBI is using its new power.

What made the Congress and Bush think that they could just dispense with due process? buy viagra online purchase Yes, we’re at war with a casino network of psychos that don’t wear uniforms, but does that mean that we, US citizens, must forfeit the constitutionally

protected right to be secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures?

Think of the implications of such arbitrarily assumed federal power. The FBI could, after having issued an NSL, search, seize, arrest and jail one indefinitely without providing an iota of proof in open court. Joe Stalin and Saddam might approve of this, but Bush?

There may yet be hope. According to an AP story, the House and Senate are negotiating a deal that will mitigate the injustice of NSLs.

The compromise CryptoLogic Operations Ltd operates Poker as a platform subscriber of Ongame Network Ltd, a registered license-holder of the Government of Gibraltar under a license (License No. also makes changes to national security letters, an investigative tool used by the FBI to compel businesses to turn over customer information without a court order or grand jury subpoena.

Under the agreement, the reauthorization specifies that an NSL can be reviewed by a court, and explicitly allows those who receive the letters to inform their lawyers about them.

While the changes are a step in the right direction, I’m not sure that those in Washington appreciate the potential danger of such legislation. For example, “the Bush administration contends that such consultation already is allowed, citing at least two court challenges to NSLs.” Nice try, Bush, but those two court challenges were raised after you signed that piece of crap into law!

Sigh…just remember, Mr. & Mrs. America, if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear…right?

zp8497586rq
TrackBack URI: http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2005/12/08/renewing-the-patriot-act/trackback/
Read more posts from
• • •

2 Comments

  1. I would have to agree that some giant loss of rights is involved with the Patriot Act, the largest being how to side step getting a warrant.
    In my opinion any threat that has been brought to the point of needing action has also developed over a significant period of time, enough to go before a judge/magistrate and obtain a warrant.
    The idea of signing away rights of individuals to protect or safeguard rights is insane. Once you give up your rights and liberties you are at the mercy of those to whom you gave them to, in this case your government, the same government which has decided that eminent domain means there is no such thing as private property which cannot be taken away, the same government which ruled that abortion is not murder or that starving Teri Shivo to death was legal. Is this the government that you want to turn over all your liberties too?

    Comment by TF Stern — December 8, 2005 @ 2:04 pm
  2. TF Stern: In my opinion any threat that has been brought to the point of needing action has also developed over a significant period of time, enough to go before a judge/magistrate and obtain a warrant.

    I think you’re right and I have no problem with the issuance of warrants, as long as an impartial judge reviews the evidence and the accused can appeal the charges in open court. However, the previous/current use of NSLs is anathema to the principles that form the basis of the Constitution.

    Comment by Robert — December 8, 2005 @ 5:21 pm

Comments RSS

Subscribe without commenting

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by: WordPress • Template by: Eric • Banner #1, #3, #4 by Stephen Macklin • Banner #2 by Mark RaynerXML