Comments on: Freedom Of Speech Means Freedom To Offend

By: Jill Henry

Jill Henry — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 17:40:22 +0000

“Now, as to the specific questions Jill brings up. First, they have been debunked by all serious scholars of WWII. But, to answer them myself.” — Eric

Was Galilio debunked as well?

Please go to these links:
Victims of the holocaust industry:
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/victims/index.html

Article that details the use of torture and threats of death against Nuremberg defendents:
http://www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/12/2/Weber167-213.html

The Nuremberg Trials extensively used torture and threats of death against German defendents. Since these trials, numerous revisionists have been murdered, had acid thrown in their face and been imprisoned.

Do “serious scholars” give credence to these kinds of tactics? No, only thugs or the naeve.

By: Eric

Eric — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:03:04 +0000

Now, as to the specific questions Jill brings up. First, they have been debunked by all serious scholars of WWII. But, to answer them myself.

1. If you were Jewish, Slavic, a Gypsy, or one of the many other groups that were tortured, enslaved and taken to the camps, how might you react to the neo-nazi’s, and other apologists, who try to say the Holocaust didn’t happen? That doesn’t excuse the actions taken by such people, but it certainly goes a long way toward understanding why.

2. This question is plain silly. I’ve read first hand accounts by former members of the Waffen-SS that totally contradict this propaganda (Black Edelweiss, for example). Further, multiple accounts by people involved in the questioning and trials all agree that most of the surviving Nazi leadership were very forthcoming about the “Final Solution”. That being the case, someone’s lying. I would suggest that a conspiracy to hide such things on that scale could not be kept hidden for 6 decades. In other words, the stories of torture and abuse are false.

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:26:56 +0000

Eric,

I would’ve let the comment through myself.

At the same time, though, to any other Jill Henry’s out there who might be reading this let me make this perfectly clear — the Holocaust happened, six million Jews, and countless millions of others, were sent to their death by one of most evil regimes ever to hold power in human history. That is the truth. David Irving is wrong. He does, however, have the right to be wrong.

By: Eric

Eric — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:18:56 +0000

Although I very seriously disagree with the thoughts posted by Jill Henry in the first comment on this thread, when I found it waiting to be moderated, I marked it for approval.

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:54:54 +0000

The NCAA is an interesting hybrid. Yes, its a private organization, but most of its member-colleges are public institutions.

By: Ryan

Ryan — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:36:59 +0000

As far as the NCAA goes, I believe (correct me if I’m wrong) they are a priavate organizationcorrect? So they have the right to do what they are doing (I certainly don’t agree with it, but they have that right), but yea, it makes me mad when people tell flat out lies (such as denying the holocaust), though when you put it this way I guess there isn’t much I can do to stop them… interesting post.

By: Jill Henry

Jill Henry — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:04:33 +0000

In my own research on the Holocaust, I’ve come across two things that are problematical. Why have revisionist historians, scientists and publishers been murdered, assaulted, had acid thrown in their face, and been imprisoned?

Here is a site that gives a partial list of these victims: http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/victims/index.html

And why was it necessary to torture confessions from Nazis during the Nuremberg trials?

Here is an article that details the extensive use of torture by the Allies against Nazi defendants:
http://www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/12/2/Weber167-213.html