<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Government Out Of The Marriage Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/getting-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/getting-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Aitchison</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/getting-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Aitchison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/getting-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/#comment-1642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been saying this for years, marriage is a fundamentally religious institution and should be none of the governments business.  It should be between you, your spouse and your clergy whom you marry.

I don&#039;t need a license from the state for my son to have his Bar Mitzvah and I shouldn&#039;t have needed one to get married.

To eliminate the institution of civil marriage would require changes to our legal structure to cover issues like inheritance (currently spouses inherit property tax free) joint proprty (already largely covery by incorporation), next of kin, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been saying this for years, marriage is a fundamentally religious institution and should be none of the governments business.  It should be between you, your spouse and your clergy whom you marry.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t need a license from the state for my son to have his Bar Mitzvah and I shouldn&#8217;t have needed one to get married.</p>
<p>To eliminate the institution of civil marriage would require changes to our legal structure to cover issues like inheritance (currently spouses inherit property tax free) joint proprty (already largely covery by incorporation), next of kin, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Marriage: A Thought Experiment</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/getting-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Marriage: A Thought Experiment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 20:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/getting-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/#comment-1480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ryan: I actually have to agree with Lifton on this. We need some sort of civil recognition of the union of two... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ryan: I actually have to agree with Lifton on this. We need some sort of civil recognition of the union of two&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/getting-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 20:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/getting-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/#comment-1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually have to agree with Lifton on this. We need some sort of civil recognition of the union of two partners for financial reasons, but I totally agree with the whole marriage being a religious issue. For once we have a good proposal coming from a person in government. Props to you Barbara Lifton!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have to agree with Lifton on this. We need some sort of civil recognition of the union of two partners for financial reasons, but I totally agree with the whole marriage being a religious issue. For once we have a good proposal coming from a person in government. Props to you Barbara Lifton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
