<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marriage: A Thought Experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/marriage-a-thought-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/marriage-a-thought-experiment/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Below The Beltway</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/marriage-a-thought-experiment/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Below The Beltway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/marriage-a-thought-experiment/#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Further Thoughts On Marriage&lt;/strong&gt;


...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Further Thoughts On Marriage</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndianCowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/marriage-a-thought-experiment/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>IndianCowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 05:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/marriage-a-thought-experiment/#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>there are those of us who would argue that it&#039;s impossible for a homosexual couple to &lt;em&gt;be&lt;/em&gt; married regardless of what some stupid government certificate said.

Which doesn&#039;t change the fact that they love each other and should receive the same rights accorded to heterosexual couples.

My objection is to the use of the word, not to their legal status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are those of us who would argue that it&#8217;s impossible for a homosexual couple to <em>be</em> married regardless of what some stupid government certificate said.</p>
<p>Which doesn&#8217;t change the fact that they love each other and should receive the same rights accorded to heterosexual couples.</p>
<p>My objection is to the use of the word, not to their legal status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/marriage-a-thought-experiment/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 02:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/07/marriage-a-thought-experiment/#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So how exactly will state recognition of gay “marriage” change their impression of what marriage really means?&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re assuming that some opponents of &quot;gay marriage&quot; are opposing it because they want to &quot;defend marriage&quot; instead of good ol&#039; fashioned bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So how exactly will state recognition of gay “marriage” change their impression of what marriage really means?</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re assuming that some opponents of &#8220;gay marriage&#8221; are opposing it because they want to &#8220;defend marriage&#8221; instead of good ol&#8217; fashioned bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

