Comments on: A Victory For Property Rights In Ohio http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/ Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: ibybvijxa http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-2198 ibybvijxa Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:20:58 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-2198 <strong>fdidgqrfwi</strong> ltguqwjw recydptqxy rssuerpemza mldlzko zlotrhky fdidgqrfwi

ltguqwjw recydptqxy rssuerpemza mldlzko zlotrhky

]]> By: mtdycnrw http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-2185 mtdycnrw Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:09:40 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-2185 <strong>bropmwjyq</strong> mrhabwfmc rtsqampe rnpulspie eiawzccettm ohbzolwwzk bropmwjyq

mrhabwfmc rtsqampe rnpulspie eiawzccettm ohbzolwwzk

]]> By: uzxavusrns http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-2016 uzxavusrns Fri, 04 Aug 2006 01:18:42 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-2016 <strong>isxtgqlue</strong> ykelzdaca perggfhy kfchrkd isxtgqlue

ykelzdaca perggfhy kfchrkd

]]> By: The Virginia Progressive http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-1983 The Virginia Progressive Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:20:25 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-1983 <strong>Virginia Blog Carnival</strong> Always on Watch shows what he does to trolls in a post called “Blog News”. Kenton Ngo refers to the House attempt to help combat online predators as “tilting at windmills” in “Deleting Online Predators Act Passes House: St... Virginia Blog Carnival

Always on Watch shows what he does to trolls in a post called “Blog News”.
Kenton Ngo refers to the House attempt to help combat online predators as “tilting at windmills” in “Deleting Online Predators Act Passes House: St…

]]> By: The Liberty Papers»Blog Archive » Norwood v. Horney: A Crushing Blow To Kelo http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-1906 The Liberty Papers»Blog Archive » Norwood v. Horney: A Crushing Blow To Kelo Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:11:42 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-1906 [...] Duncan Currie writes in The Weekly Standard about Wednesday’s decision by the Ohio Supreme Court in Norwood v. Horney, which he calls a crushing blow to the rationale behind the infamous Kelo decision. Currie identifies three areas in which the Norwood decision undermines the rationale behind the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London: First: The Ohio High Court implicitly rejected the rationale behind Kelo. “Although economic factors may be considered in determining whether private property may be appropriated,” wrote Justice Maureen O’Connor, “the fact that the appropriation would provide an economic benefit to the government and community, standing alone, does not satisfy the public-use requirement of Section 19, Article I of the Ohio Constitution.” [...] [...] Duncan Currie writes in The Weekly Standard about Wednesday’s decision by the Ohio Supreme Court in Norwood v. Horney, which he calls a crushing blow to the rationale behind the infamous Kelo decision. Currie identifies three areas in which the Norwood decision undermines the rationale behind the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London: First: The Ohio High Court implicitly rejected the rationale behind Kelo. “Although economic factors may be considered in determining whether private property may be appropriated,” wrote Justice Maureen O’Connor, “the fact that the appropriation would provide an economic benefit to the government and community, standing alone, does not satisfy the public-use requirement of Section 19, Article I of the Ohio Constitution.” [...]

]]> By: Brock http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-1867 Brock Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:17:45 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-1867 Check that. Property rights, not privacy rights. Check that. Property rights, not privacy rights.

]]> By: Brock http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-1859 Brock Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:35:45 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/07/26/a-victory-for-property-rights-in-ohio/#comment-1859 While this, on the face, seems like the OSC recognizing privacy rights, I am deeply concerned about the quote from O'Connor. "...the sovereign's power" is an interesting phrase. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe a US state meets the definition of sovereign. That boat sailed with the ratification of the constitution and was reaffirmed by the 14th Amendment. Second, other than describing monarchy, I've never hear it used by an American to mean anything other than internationally-recognized defensible property. O'Connor seems to use the "supreme authority" definition of sovereign, meaning state as master. For hopefully obvious reasons, I'm not too keen on pols, counselors, or bureaucrats holding that idea in their head for long, let alone putting it on paper. While this, on the face, seems like the OSC recognizing privacy rights, I am deeply concerned about the quote from O’Connor. “…the sovereign’s power” is an interesting phrase.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t believe a US state meets the definition of sovereign. That boat sailed with the ratification of the constitution and was reaffirmed by the 14th Amendment.

Second, other than describing monarchy, I’ve never hear it used by an American to mean anything other than internationally-recognized defensible property. O’Connor seems to use the “supreme authority” definition of sovereign, meaning state as master. For hopefully obvious reasons, I’m not too keen on pols, counselors, or bureaucrats holding that idea in their head for long, let alone putting it on paper.

]]>