Thoughts, essays, and writings on Liberty. Written by the heirs of Patrick Henry.

“If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”     Samuel Adams

November 26, 2006

The Problem With No-Knock Raids

by Doug Mataconis

There have been several posts here this week about what can go wrong when police execute a so-called no-knock search warrant, or more generally when they shoot first and ask questions later. In Atlanta, in resulted in the death of a 92 year-old woman. And, in New York, the shoot-first-ask-questions-later philosophy resulted in the death of a 23 year-old father on the eve of his wedding.

If these were only isolated incidents, we could possibly place the blame on over eager police officers in a particular jurisdiction, or perhaps a police force that doesn’t train its officers well enough on the use of deadly force. As Randy Balko, who has been on top of this issue for a long time now, points out, though, these are just the most recent incidents among many, and points to this report of another shooting in Merced, California:

Mary Silva, a 68-year-old retiree, said deputies got the wrong house when they burst into her Winton Way apartment at 6:30 a.m. on the day of the raids.

Silva said she was sleeping when she heard loud banging at her front door and a voice calling “Open up!”

Before she could answer, Silva said, deputies broke through her front door and threw a smoke bomb onto her carpet. As Silva stood in her nightgown, about 10 officers surrounded her with weapons drawn, she said.

They shouted, “Where is he? Where is he?”

Silva told deputies she lives alone. She said they responded, “Shut up! Don’t move!”

The team was looking for 24-year-old Reginaldo Ramirez, who lives next door to Silva.

But the search warrant deputies gave Silva lists an entirely different address — not Silva’s house or the house next door. Silva said deputies gave her the search warrant several hours after the initial raid.

Pazin said deputies may have transposed numbers in the address on the warrant, but that law enforcement acted in good faith when they entered Silva’s house.

The police are blaming the suspect they were looking for, who allegedly used Silva’s house when he was arrested at some point in the past. But, as Balko, points out, that’s just evading responsibility:

Police, on the other hand, are accountable to us. The least we can demand of them is that they do the necessary legwork before barging into our homes. Parzin’s men failed the people they serve in that regard. They took the word of a criminal. They did no corroborating investigation to see that the address he listed was indeed where he lived, or to see if other, innocent people may live there. Not only that, but they then transposed the numbers on the search warrant. They erred. Big time. They ought to cop to it. That is precisely where the “finger of blame” ought to be pointed.

The problem is, I think, that no-knock raids make it easy for the police to evade that responsibility. The warrant says they can go into a particular house without announcing their presence, so they do it. The fact that they may not even have the right house apparently doesn’t even enter their mind.

If nothing else Silva is lucky she didn’t have a gun in the house or that she otherwise didn’t try to defend herself, or she would’ve ended up like the woman in Atlanta.
Related Posts:

More Police Shooting Justice
Another Police Shooting

Shooting Shows Need For Reform
Another Victim Of The Drug War

TrackBack URI: http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/11/26/the-problem-with-no-knock-raids/trackback/
Read more posts from
• • •

6 Comments

  1. What does the Jamaica incident have to do with no-knock raids?

    Comment by KipEsquire — November 26, 2006 @ 7:14 am
  2. Kip,

    As I mentioned in the article, it’s not just about no-knock raids, although they are receiving the headlines.

    As the Jamaica incident points out, there is a definite shoot-first-and-ask-questions later philosophy at play here. No-knock raids are a big part of that, but so is the Jamaica incident, and the incident in Fairfax, Virginia I posted about last night.

    Comment by Doug Mataconis — November 26, 2006 @ 7:19 am
  3. It takes a death of a 92 year old woman to get you upset. I hope everyone of you were concerned, when black communities complained of this problem, since many people thought we were complainers or just playing the race card.

    Comment by VRB — November 26, 2006 @ 10:33 am
  4. VRB, I\’ve been concerned about the War on Drugs for a long time. I\’ve spoken out about it for a long time and about the subtle racism involved for a long time. I\’d point you to those writings, but they are under a different name that I can\’t associate with this one for a variety of reasons.

    I hope you recognize that the key here is that people wake up and see the issue, regardless of whether they did so in the past, or not. I also hope you have seen the number of posts on this site about the \”War on Drugs\” that decry the violence. You might notice the number of posts here about the Cory Maye case. Do you?

    Comment by Adam Selene — November 26, 2006 @ 10:42 am
  5. It’s just a small nitpick, but it’s ‘Radley’ Balko.

    Nick

    Comment by Nick — November 28, 2006 @ 9:42 pm
  6. We are going as*-backwards here instead of evolving we are going the Russian ways, kick a*s first and ask questions later but many of us as we know do carry or have weapons in the house for protection.

    Now someone busting in @ 2am and smoke bombs and you are 1/2 asleep with a handgun under the pillow and a shotgun under the bed you’re looking at a gun battle . The sad thing would be is that they would have or had the wrong house and you get to die and they get to live because you do not sleep with bulletproof jacket, helmet and such.

    This is all bull-shi*. If they are that bad or actual meth house you would put a surveillance team outside the house one or two days before the raid or some sort of surveillance.

    I don’t know about you but it doesn’t take squad to be part of SWAT just another officer with some shooting skills. I meet with them down the bar while they get wasted or some that have DUI on their records. Go figure.

    Comment by Debora — December 2, 2006 @ 9:18 am

Comments RSS

Subscribe without commenting

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by: WordPress • Template by: Eric • Banner #1, #3, #4 by Stephen Macklin • Banner #2 by Mark RaynerXML