<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Social Security &#8220;Trust Fund&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3860</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investor and consumer confidence, among other things. An economy that was shrinking. Companies that were over valued. A whole lot of things. But, the belief that the Internet fundamentally changed business models was the real problem. Economics doesn&#039;t change because of new technology, yet a whole lot of smart people seemed to buy in to the idea that the Internet and e-commerce changed economics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investor and consumer confidence, among other things. An economy that was shrinking. Companies that were over valued. A whole lot of things. But, the belief that the Internet fundamentally changed business models was the real problem. Economics doesn&#8217;t change because of new technology, yet a whole lot of smart people seemed to buy in to the idea that the Internet and e-commerce changed economics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRB</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3858</link>
		<dc:creator>VRB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know they threw out the baby with the bath water in 1999. Some stock prices I couldn&#039;t fathom why they dropped. Not an expert, just saying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know they threw out the baby with the bath water in 1999. Some stock prices I couldn&#8217;t fathom why they dropped. Not an expert, just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3848</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dot com crash was obvious to anyone with a mind to see it as early as 1999. Sorry you lost 50% in the crash, but it&#039;s your fault, not the eeeevul conservatives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dot com crash was obvious to anyone with a mind to see it as early as 1999. Sorry you lost 50% in the crash, but it&#8217;s your fault, not the eeeevul conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3841</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;&quot;The SS bonds cannot be bought by anyone but the government so they can’t be sold to people who wouldn’t pay them back.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Bonds don&#039;t get paid back by the people who bought them.  They get paid back by the people who sold them (the government).  In this case, the SS administration uses its surplus to buy bonds from the general treasury.  The only question is whether the money to pay off those bonds comes from higher SS taxes or higher taxes elsewhere (income, cap gains, etc)?

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Debt doesn’t bother the government, now does it?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Nope.  But the taxpayers pay back that debt, so the fact that they&#039;re hiding deficit spending by &quot;borrowing&quot; from social security surpluses should make us all upset.

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Another part is to privatize it and throw everyone on to the stock market forces. It has done okay the last 3 years, but I lost half of my money in the bubble crash in 2001. Some lost 75%. It was 6 trillion dollars lost. That money didn’t disappear, it went in the pockets of the same people that want all our Social Security. Forget that idea.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Forget privatization.  Why don&#039;t we just means-test the program?  That way you can get your class-warfare jabs in at rich people (i.e. they don&#039;t get SS benefits) and I don&#039;t get my taxes raised.  And neither of us have to watch the government stick their grubby, over-regulating hands deep into the heart of the stock market.  How&#039;s that for a happy medium?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;The SS bonds cannot be bought by anyone but the government so they can’t be sold to people who wouldn’t pay them back.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Bonds don&#8217;t get paid back by the people who bought them.  They get paid back by the people who sold them (the government).  In this case, the SS administration uses its surplus to buy bonds from the general treasury.  The only question is whether the money to pay off those bonds comes from higher SS taxes or higher taxes elsewhere (income, cap gains, etc)?</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Debt doesn’t bother the government, now does it?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Nope.  But the taxpayers pay back that debt, so the fact that they&#8217;re hiding deficit spending by &#8220;borrowing&#8221; from social security surpluses should make us all upset.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Another part is to privatize it and throw everyone on to the stock market forces. It has done okay the last 3 years, but I lost half of my money in the bubble crash in 2001. Some lost 75%. It was 6 trillion dollars lost. That money didn’t disappear, it went in the pockets of the same people that want all our Social Security. Forget that idea.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Forget privatization.  Why don&#8217;t we just means-test the program?  That way you can get your class-warfare jabs in at rich people (i.e. they don&#8217;t get SS benefits) and I don&#8217;t get my taxes raised.  And neither of us have to watch the government stick their grubby, over-regulating hands deep into the heart of the stock market.  How&#8217;s that for a happy medium?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3839</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 13:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering the fact the rich got a huge tax cut, and millionaires turned into billionaires, while they used our trust fund from Social Security to pay part of the country&#039;s expenses, then they should be the ones that pay it back.

Considering the fact that the reason Social Security is going to be hard to pay back is because of the tax cut during a war which the average working person doesn&#039;t want, then let those who have proffited from the war pay back the bonds.

The amount of the ceiling of Social Security should be deducted from any taxes to pay Social Security back.

Those bonds are special because FDR knew even then there were those who would try to destroy Social Security.  The SS bonds cannot be bought by anyone but the government so they can&#039;t be sold to people who wouldn&#039;t pay them back.  The government can borrow the money to pay those bonds off.  Debt doesn&#039;t bother the government, now does it?

The reason that there is going to be a problem at all in the future is because the cold hearted, cheap conservatives are shipping our jobs overseas, so there won&#039;t be enough good paying jobs.  

If business succeeds in screwing any generation out of Social Security, I promise you I will never buy American products again.  

Part of this push is so insurance companies can sell annuities. It is already written in a bill that people with private accounts in lieu of Social Security will have to put above poverty level money in annuities.  That costs about $300,000 to draw $10,000 and that is not inheritable.  

Another part is to privatize it and throw everyone on to the stock market forces.  It has done okay the last 3 years, but I lost half of my money in the bubble crash in 2001. Some lost 75%. It was 6 trillion dollars lost.  That money didn&#039;t disappear, it went in the pockets of the same people that want all our Social Security. Forget that idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the fact the rich got a huge tax cut, and millionaires turned into billionaires, while they used our trust fund from Social Security to pay part of the country&#8217;s expenses, then they should be the ones that pay it back.</p>
<p>Considering the fact that the reason Social Security is going to be hard to pay back is because of the tax cut during a war which the average working person doesn&#8217;t want, then let those who have proffited from the war pay back the bonds.</p>
<p>The amount of the ceiling of Social Security should be deducted from any taxes to pay Social Security back.</p>
<p>Those bonds are special because FDR knew even then there were those who would try to destroy Social Security.  The SS bonds cannot be bought by anyone but the government so they can&#8217;t be sold to people who wouldn&#8217;t pay them back.  The government can borrow the money to pay those bonds off.  Debt doesn&#8217;t bother the government, now does it?</p>
<p>The reason that there is going to be a problem at all in the future is because the cold hearted, cheap conservatives are shipping our jobs overseas, so there won&#8217;t be enough good paying jobs.  </p>
<p>If business succeeds in screwing any generation out of Social Security, I promise you I will never buy American products again.  </p>
<p>Part of this push is so insurance companies can sell annuities. It is already written in a bill that people with private accounts in lieu of Social Security will have to put above poverty level money in annuities.  That costs about $300,000 to draw $10,000 and that is not inheritable.  </p>
<p>Another part is to privatize it and throw everyone on to the stock market forces.  It has done okay the last 3 years, but I lost half of my money in the bubble crash in 2001. Some lost 75%. It was 6 trillion dollars lost.  That money didn&#8217;t disappear, it went in the pockets of the same people that want all our Social Security. Forget that idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3831</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 03:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saul,

SSTF monies are nothing like Treasury bonds sold on the open market.  There are no bonds that I can access in the SSTF, so I cannot possibly get a hold of any to give to you.

Besides, all bonds are government debt.  Government debt inevitably has to be paid for by someone.  Who&#039;s going to pay for it?  Taxpayers.

Read up on the SSTF a bit more, you&#039;ll be surprised at what you find.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saul,</p>
<p>SSTF monies are nothing like Treasury bonds sold on the open market.  There are no bonds that I can access in the SSTF, so I cannot possibly get a hold of any to give to you.</p>
<p>Besides, all bonds are government debt.  Government debt inevitably has to be paid for by someone.  Who&#8217;s going to pay for it?  Taxpayers.</p>
<p>Read up on the SSTF a bit more, you&#8217;ll be surprised at what you find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saul friedman</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3821</link>
		<dc:creator>saul friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 02:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/01/the-social-security-trust-fund/#comment-3821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a look at your money or your bank accounts; they are all backed by promissory notes. Banks go under. Treasury bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the US, which is why the Chinese and everone else loves our bonds.  If you think the bonds in the SSTF are going to be worthless, would you give me some?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at your money or your bank accounts; they are all backed by promissory notes. Banks go under. Treasury bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the US, which is why the Chinese and everone else loves our bonds.  If you think the bonds in the SSTF are going to be worthless, would you give me some?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
