<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F.A. Hayek On Conservatives vs. Classical Liberals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/04/fa-hayek-on-conservatives-vs-classical-liberals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/04/fa-hayek-on-conservatives-vs-classical-liberals/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Why Republicans Need Libertarians</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/04/fa-hayek-on-conservatives-vs-classical-liberals/#comment-4088</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Why Republicans Need Libertarians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/04/fa-hayek-on-conservatives-vs-classical-liberals/#comment-4088</guid>
		<description>[...] Liberals Matt Welch on Liberaltarians  Bookmark to:      Posted By: Doug Mataconis @ 8:08 am &#124;&#124; Permalink &#124;&#124; &#124;&#124; Categories: Theory and Ideas, Politics   TrackBack URI:http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/09/why-republicans-need-libertarians/trackback/ Read more posts from Doug Mataconis    &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liberals Matt Welch on Liberaltarians  Bookmark to:      Posted By: Doug Mataconis @ 8:08 am || Permalink || || Categories: Theory and Ideas, Politics   TrackBack URI:http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/09/why-republicans-need-libertarians/trackback/ Read more posts from Doug Mataconis    &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Selene</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/04/fa-hayek-on-conservatives-vs-classical-liberals/#comment-3943</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Selene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/04/fa-hayek-on-conservatives-vs-classical-liberals/#comment-3943</guid>
		<description>Hell, they&#039;ve been so distorted for so long that we had to come up with entirely new political terms for Liberals (Libertarians), Conservatives (Moderates), and Socialists (Liberals or Progressives). Orwell was frigging brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell, they&#8217;ve been so distorted for so long that we had to come up with entirely new political terms for Liberals (Libertarians), Conservatives (Moderates), and Socialists (Liberals or Progressives). Orwell was frigging brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/04/fa-hayek-on-conservatives-vs-classical-liberals/#comment-3942</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/04/fa-hayek-on-conservatives-vs-classical-liberals/#comment-3942</guid>
		<description>and here&#039;s the damning indictment of American conservatives:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;It may well be asked whether the name really matters so much. In a country like the United States, which on the whole has free institutions and where, therefore, the defense of the existing is often a defense of freedom, it might not make so much difference if the defenders of freedom call themselves conservatives, although even here the association with the conservatives by disposition will often be embarrassing. Even when men approve of the same arrangements, it must be asked whether they approve of them because they exist or because they are desirable in themselves. The common resistance to the collectivist tide should not be allowed to obscure the fact that the belief in integral freedom is based on an essentially forward-looking attitude and not on any nostalgic longing for the past or a romantic admiration for what has been.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But of course, terms like &quot;liberal&quot; and &quot;conservative&quot; will start meaning less and less over the next decade or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and here&#8217;s the damning indictment of American conservatives:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>It may well be asked whether the name really matters so much. In a country like the United States, which on the whole has free institutions and where, therefore, the defense of the existing is often a defense of freedom, it might not make so much difference if the defenders of freedom call themselves conservatives, although even here the association with the conservatives by disposition will often be embarrassing. Even when men approve of the same arrangements, it must be asked whether they approve of them because they exist or because they are desirable in themselves. The common resistance to the collectivist tide should not be allowed to obscure the fact that the belief in integral freedom is based on an essentially forward-looking attitude and not on any nostalgic longing for the past or a romantic admiration for what has been.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>But of course, terms like &#8220;liberal&#8221; and &#8220;conservative&#8221; will start meaning less and less over the next decade or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
