Comments on: Sex Offender Insanity http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/08/sex-offender-insanity/ Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Daniel http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/08/sex-offender-insanity/#comment-5105 Daniel Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:43:24 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/08/sex-offender-insanity/#comment-5105 Americans finally realize the try-before-you-buy works just as well with sex as it does with commodities. Rather than marrying and then shacking up with hot sex coming after the nuptuals, Americans are increasingly putting out before putting on the wedding rings.Women are just as likely as men to get it on before matrimony. I think this is just the sign of the times. I mean, we like to test things, try them out, before making a purchase. Why should sex and marriage be any different? The stigma associated with pre-marital sex is dead. Long live free love! Americans finally realize the try-before-you-buy works just as well with sex as it does with commodities. Rather than marrying and then shacking up with hot sex coming after the nuptuals, Americans are increasingly putting out before putting on the wedding rings.Women are just as likely as men to get it on before matrimony.
I think this is just the sign of the times. I mean, we like to test things, try them out, before making a purchase. Why should sex and marriage be any different? The stigma associated with pre-marital sex is dead. Long live free love!

]]> By: C. Johnson http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/08/sex-offender-insanity/#comment-4067 C. Johnson Sat, 09 Dec 2006 08:36:02 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/08/sex-offender-insanity/#comment-4067 Just one more result of "feel good" legislation for headlines and votes that has done nothing to protect anyone. This whole insanity needs to stopped, thught out and started again in the right direction based on facts and real life. Until we the people make our legislators do that, this will be more and more common place and clog our court system. Just one more result of “feel good” legislation for headlines and votes that has done nothing to protect anyone.

This whole insanity needs to stopped, thught out and started again in the right direction based on facts and real life.

Until we the people make our legislators do that, this will be more and more common place and clog our court system.

]]> By: Sue Bob http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/08/sex-offender-insanity/#comment-4045 Sue Bob Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:48:24 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/08/sex-offender-insanity/#comment-4045 Does this conviction mean that they will have to be put on a sex offender's registry? If so, these children will have a very iffy future when it comes to being accepted by a university, the military or professions that require licensure or certification--like attorneys, doctors, nurse aides, etc.. This is legalism run amok! Does this conviction mean that they will have to be put on a sex offender’s registry? If so, these children will have a very iffy future when it comes to being accepted by a university, the military or professions that require licensure or certification–like attorneys, doctors, nurse aides, etc..

This is legalism run amok!

]]> By: Chris Byrne http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/08/sex-offender-insanity/#comment-4031 Chris Byrne Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:00:49 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/08/sex-offender-insanity/#comment-4031 Ok, so stop me if I'm off base here but: 1. The states justification for banning sex with or by someone under the age of 14, is predicated on the fact that a 14 year old cannot make informed consent. 2. By this same logic, would it not then be impossible for that person under 14 to have formed requisite culpable intent? If someone under 14 CAN have culpable intent; would this not also mean they were qualified to consent? Ok, so stop me if I’m off base here but:

1. The states justification for banning sex with or by someone under the age of 14, is predicated on the fact that a 14 year old cannot make informed consent.

2. By this same logic, would it not then be impossible for that person under 14 to have formed requisite culpable intent?

If someone under 14 CAN have culpable intent; would this not also mean they were qualified to consent?

]]>