<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That&#8217;s Exactly The Point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/19/thats-exactly-the-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/19/thats-exactly-the-point/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The Tyranny Of The Majority</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/19/thats-exactly-the-point/#comment-4641</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The Tyranny Of The Majority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 04:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/19/thats-exactly-the-point/#comment-4641</guid>
		<description>[...] As both Adam and Brad have noted, I stirred up quite a little hornet&#8217;s nest with my post earlier today addressing a liberal leftist who didn&#8217;t really seem to understand (or respect) libertarian thought. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As both Adam and Brad have noted, I stirred up quite a little hornet&#8217;s nest with my post earlier today addressing a liberal leftist who didn&#8217;t really seem to understand (or respect) libertarian thought. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Libertarianism and Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/19/thats-exactly-the-point/#comment-4632</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Libertarianism and Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/19/thats-exactly-the-point/#comment-4632</guid>
		<description>[...] Libertarianism isn&#8217;t anti-Democracy. In fact, the statement itself is nonsensical. Libertarianism is a moral system, valuing individual liberty as it&#8217;s highest ideal. Democracy is a form of government, consisting of majority rule. Or, to make it more plain, liberty is an end, democracy is a means to an end.  But unfortunately, it&#8217;s not that simple. You hear many quotes from Libertarians deriding democracy. Doug said it yesterday. Thomas Jefferson was the one who said &#8220;A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.&#8221; Libertarians are fearful of democracy. If a statement that libertarianism is anti-democratic is nonsense, why do so many libertarians make these types of statements about democracy? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Libertarianism isn&#8217;t anti-Democracy. In fact, the statement itself is nonsensical. Libertarianism is a moral system, valuing individual liberty as it&#8217;s highest ideal. Democracy is a form of government, consisting of majority rule. Or, to make it more plain, liberty is an end, democracy is a means to an end.  But unfortunately, it&#8217;s not that simple. You hear many quotes from Libertarians deriding democracy. Doug said it yesterday. Thomas Jefferson was the one who said &#8220;A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.&#8221; Libertarians are fearful of democracy. If a statement that libertarianism is anti-democratic is nonsense, why do so many libertarians make these types of statements about democracy? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mahablog &#187; Another Rightie Who Can&#8217;t Read</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/19/thats-exactly-the-point/#comment-4611</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mahablog &#187; Another Rightie Who Can&#8217;t Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2006/12/19/thats-exactly-the-point/#comment-4611</guid>
		<description>[...] I noticed this trackback to the last post. It proves my point about the general fuzzy-headedness of the &#8220;limited government&#8221; argument. Even though I specifically (and clearly, I think) wrote that government must be restricted from abusing civil liberties, the blogger wrote, Does Ms. O’Brien really believe that there shouldn’t be any limits on the will of the people ? If she does, then we’ve got to toss out most of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, because that’s precisely what they do. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I noticed this trackback to the last post. It proves my point about the general fuzzy-headedness of the &#8220;limited government&#8221; argument. Even though I specifically (and clearly, I think) wrote that government must be restricted from abusing civil liberties, the blogger wrote, Does Ms. O’Brien really believe that there shouldn’t be any limits on the will of the people ? If she does, then we’ve got to toss out most of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, because that’s precisely what they do. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
