<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Administration Official Rejects Right To Fair Trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/16/bush-administration-official-rejects-right-to-fair-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/16/bush-administration-official-rejects-right-to-fair-trial/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/16/bush-administration-official-rejects-right-to-fair-trial/#comment-6570</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/16/bush-administration-official-rejects-right-to-fair-trial/#comment-6570</guid>
		<description>What implied threat? He is suggesting a boycott; which is a matter of conscience not governmental action.

Now as to seeing the sorces of money used to pay the lawyers investigated, GOOD, they should be investigated; because they&#039;re being paid for by terrorists. If a lawyer thinks he&#039;s getting shady money, he shouldnt take the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What implied threat? He is suggesting a boycott; which is a matter of conscience not governmental action.</p>
<p>Now as to seeing the sorces of money used to pay the lawyers investigated, GOOD, they should be investigated; because they&#8217;re being paid for by terrorists. If a lawyer thinks he&#8217;s getting shady money, he shouldnt take the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/16/bush-administration-official-rejects-right-to-fair-trial/#comment-6527</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/16/bush-administration-official-rejects-right-to-fair-trial/#comment-6527</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Because the difference is that he is in charge of the detainee trials at Gitmo and he&#039;s tainting the process by the implied threat. If this was some low level flunky at the EPA or some other government agency that had nothing to do with the trials, I would have no problem with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Because the difference is that he is in charge of the detainee trials at Gitmo and he&#8217;s tainting the process by the implied threat. If this was some low level flunky at the EPA or some other government agency that had nothing to do with the trials, I would have no problem with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/16/bush-administration-official-rejects-right-to-fair-trial/#comment-6480</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/16/bush-administration-official-rejects-right-to-fair-trial/#comment-6480</guid>
		<description>He expressed a personal opinion, that other people should express their personal opinions, and vote with their dollars. What&#039;s wrong with that?

Personally, I wouldnt associate myself with an attorney who represented PETA, or HCI, or any number of other organizations.

If I encourage other people to make a personal decision about who they would associate themselves with, whats the problem in that? Even if I&#039;m a government official saying it, I still dont see the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He expressed a personal opinion, that other people should express their personal opinions, and vote with their dollars. What&#8217;s wrong with that?</p>
<p>Personally, I wouldnt associate myself with an attorney who represented PETA, or HCI, or any number of other organizations.</p>
<p>If I encourage other people to make a personal decision about who they would associate themselves with, whats the problem in that? Even if I&#8217;m a government official saying it, I still dont see the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
