Comments on: The Case For Abolishing The FCC http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/22/the-case-for-abolishing-the-fcc/ Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time. Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Timothy West http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/22/the-case-for-abolishing-the-fcc/#comment-8214 Timothy West Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:25:50 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/22/the-case-for-abolishing-the-fcc/#comment-8214 am radio does not have enough spectrum space to do anything but serve up narrowband content. certanly not pictures.

most commenters on media and the FCC dont have enough knowledge of what they regulate to have an informed opinion about what can and should be done.

]]> By: Adam Selene http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/22/the-case-for-abolishing-the-fcc/#comment-7569 Adam Selene Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:07:52 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/22/the-case-for-abolishing-the-fcc/#comment-7569 Doug, you missed the real issue, the one that keeps the FCC in existence. The censors of the Right and the Left want to make sure no one can be indecent. Mrs. Grundy, of all political flavors, is alive and well. She’s fully aware that killing off the FCC kills off a huge amount of her power, and she is determined not to let that happen. If anyone starts to really move forward on FCC elimination, expect to hear cries of “for the sake of the children”!

]]> By: Election 2008: No More Clinton or Bush’s http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/22/the-case-for-abolishing-the-fcc/#comment-7565 Election 2008: No More Clinton or Bush’s Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:49:29 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/22/the-case-for-abolishing-the-fcc/#comment-7565 [...] I was just going to add this to the links of the day, when I saw a few things I wanted to highlight here from Paris Lemon The Los Angeles Times had a very interesting op-ed piece today which points out something that seems to be almost completely overlooked; say Hillary Clinton is elected President in 2008 and again in 2012, by the times she leaves office in 2017 that would have been 28 straight years of someone named either Bush or Clinton in the White House! This is even worse if you consider the 8 years George H.W. Bush served as Ronald Reagan’s Vice President…that would be 36 years! [...]

]]>