<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cost Of Regulating Financial Markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/23/the-cost-of-regulating-financial-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/23/the-cost-of-regulating-financial-markets/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:02:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/23/the-cost-of-regulating-financial-markets/#comment-8233</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/23/the-cost-of-regulating-financial-markets/#comment-8233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is absurd to cite an H-1b cap as the reason the New York financial center lost 2000 jobs between 2002 and 2005.  a) Through 2003 the H-1b cap as 195,000 per year and not even reached. b) The unemployment rate of tech workers was rising during that time, as the number of jobs was falling. Doug: Perhaps the lingering DOT-COM bust and the offshoring of jobs and technology to India and China under the Bush &quot;free trade&quot; schemes are to blame?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is absurd to cite an H-1b cap as the reason the New York financial center lost 2000 jobs between 2002 and 2005.  a) Through 2003 the H-1b cap as 195,000 per year and not even reached. b) The unemployment rate of tech workers was rising during that time, as the number of jobs was falling. Doug: Perhaps the lingering DOT-COM bust and the offshoring of jobs and technology to India and China under the Bush &#8220;free trade&#8221; schemes are to blame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgo</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/23/the-cost-of-regulating-financial-markets/#comment-8068</link>
		<dc:creator>jgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/23/the-cost-of-regulating-financial-markets/#comment-8068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that the current excessive limits on H-1B visas is a threat to America&#039;s high-quality work-force and make it too easy for foreigners to enter the USA without having passed -- and paid for -- a thorough background investigation.  And it encourages the initiation of fraud by executives who claimed that there is a talent shortage when there is none (RAND Corp. and others); who claimed that they would only import the &quot;best and brightest&quot;, the &quot;pre-eminent&quot; but instead flooded the science, tech and other US job markets with less competent but cheap and easily brow-beaten bodies; who claimed that they would pay the guest-workers prevailing compensation but have been repeatedly found to under-pay them (by the GAO, and several university investigations).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the current excessive limits on H-1B visas is a threat to America&#8217;s high-quality work-force and make it too easy for foreigners to enter the USA without having passed &#8212; and paid for &#8212; a thorough background investigation.  And it encourages the initiation of fraud by executives who claimed that there is a talent shortage when there is none (RAND Corp. and others); who claimed that they would only import the &#8220;best and brightest&#8221;, the &#8220;pre-eminent&#8221; but instead flooded the science, tech and other US job markets with less competent but cheap and easily brow-beaten bodies; who claimed that they would pay the guest-workers prevailing compensation but have been repeatedly found to under-pay them (by the GAO, and several university investigations).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
