What does this have to do with fighting terrorism?by Jason Pye
â€œIt appears that the administration has chosen to use this provision, which was intended to help protect our nation, to circumvent the transparent constitutional Senate confirmation process to reward political allies,â€ Pryor said in the joint Democratic statement.
Not true, Gonzales told The Associated Press.
â€œWe are fully committed to ensuring that with respect to every position we have a Senate-confirmed, presidentially appointed U.S. attorney,â€ Gonzales told editors and reporters during an interview Tuesday.
â€œWe in no way politicize these decisions,â€ he added.
In the year since the reauthorization took effect, 11 federal prosecutors have resigned or announced their resignations â€“ some at the urging of the Bush administration, Gonzales said. He described a range of reasons for ousting sitting U.S. attorneys, from their job performance to their standing in their communities, and noted that federal prosecutors serve at the pleasure of the president.
Gonzales repeatedly cited the Patriot Act when discussing the replacements, but twice refused to say when asked whether any of the personnel changes at issue pertained to national security.
But he stressed that anyone named to replace the departing prosecutors have their jobs only temporarily, pending Senate confirmation.
Gonzales scares the hell of out me, as well as the rest of the Bush Administration.
Recently, Andrew Napolitano (a Fox News contributor) had this to say about Bush and his cronies:
George W. Bush, with a rubber-stamp Congress, has shown less fidelity to the Constitution than any president since Abraham Lincoln. At the very least, with divided government in the next two years, we should expect more constitutional government.
The Bush administration, which has treated the Congressâ€”on the rare occasions when it failed to act as a rubber stampâ€”as if it were merely a constitutional nuisance, will be forced to read the supreme law of the land, and to recognize and accept the equality of the Congress with the executive branch. With the Democrats in control of both houses, we can now expect congressional interaction with the executive branch to be more in line with what the Founders contemplated.
We can also expect to learn what kind of intelligence the administration relied on and used to persuade the United Nations, the Congress, and the American people that Iraq should be invaded. We can hope to learn what kinds of activities were included in the National Security Agencyâ€™s warrantless surveillance program and in the CIA interrogation, detention, torture, and rendition program. And perhaps weâ€™ll discover what poor souls have unknowingly suffered the rape of their constitutional liberties silently administered through the PATRIOT Act.
I’d say that FDR was more abusive to the Constitution than Lincoln, but other than that, Napolitano nails it.