The Debate is Overby Stephen Littau
Global warming alarmists have cleverly come up with a term for those who are skeptical of their position as â€˜global warming deniers.â€™ Because, as they say, â€˜the debate is over,â€™ anyone who disagrees is a denier by definition. And what about scientists who disagree? They are of course being compensated by either the Bush administration, BIG OIL or both. Scientists who believe global warming is man made who receive government grants and funds from environmental activist groups on the other hand, well their motivations are pure.
Those who are promoting the global warming agenda may be onto something. Why bother debating your position when you know your position is right? This is brilliant! After all, there are several issues I know I am right about. Ending the war on (some) drugs: the debate is over. The war on drugs is completely ineffective, un-winnable, and a threat to personal liberty. I shall henceforth call anyone who supports the war on drugs a â€˜war on drugs failure denier.â€™ The debate over capitalism vs. socialism, communism, and other competing economic systems has also been settled once and for all. I shall henceforth call those who disagree with the moral superiority of capitalism over these inferior systems as â€˜free market deniersâ€™ or better yet, â€˜economics deniers.â€™
There are so many other debates I could, perhaps with â€˜consensusâ€™ of my fellow contributors here at The Liberty Papers, declare as over. We donâ€™t need to waste our time with â€˜deniersâ€™ here. We are right, you are wrong, and the debate is over.