Thoughts, essays, and writings on Liberty. Written by the heirs of Patrick Henry.

“It's time we asked ourselves if we still know the freedoms intended for us by the Founding Fathers. James Madison said, "We base all our experiments on the capacity of mankind for self-government." This idea that government was beholden to the people, that it had no other source of power, is still the newest, most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.”     Ronald Reagan

February 11, 2007

Mitt vs Mitt, Round 2

by Kevin

Former Massachussetts Governor Mitt Romney gave a speech in Detroit Wednesday. In it, he supports making the Bush tax cuts permanent. However, Mitt wasn’t always a supporter of the Bush tax cuts.

After refusing to endorse President Bush’s tax cuts when he was governor, Mitt Romney has now made them a central part of his presidential campaign, stirring accusations that he is changing his position to appeal to GOP primary voters.

In 2003, Romney stunned a roomful of Bay State congressmen by telling them that he would not publicly support Bush’s tax cuts, which at the time formed the centerpiece of the president’s domestic agenda. He even said he was open to a federal gas tax hike.

“For a Republican governor, I thought it was interesting,” U.S. Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Somerville) said. “I don’t prejudge people, so I thought he might have the courage of his convictions, but I guess I was wrong.”

In a key policy speech in Detroit yesterday, Romney said it is “absolutely critical” to renew President Bush’s tax cuts, set to expire in 2010, to help spur economic growth. It is a stance he has repeated in recent days.

So Mitt, in 2003 at least, was willing to raise gasoline taxes and income taxes. Now, in 2007 when he’s running for president, he’s for income tax cuts. Plus, he’s claiming to be a fiscal conservative as well. However, what Mitt claims and the truth are usually not the same.

But Romney’s fiscal policies in Massachusetts have received mixed marks from conservative watchdogs. The tax-averse Cato Institute gave Romney a “C” on its 2006 fiscal report card, saying the former governor acted aggressively to combat overspending, but failed to hold the line on taxes.

“His first budget included no general tax increases but did include a $500 million increase in various fees,” noted Cato Institute budget director Stephen Slivinski.

In other words, he’s a typical Northeastern Republican. What’s next I’m guessing is that Mitt is going to convert to evangelical Christianity before the South Carolina primary.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
TrackBack URI: http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/02/11/mitt-vs-mitt-round-2/trackback/
Read more posts from Kevin
• • •

1 Comment

  1. [...] sure Liberty Papers “Kevin” had a point in writing this post – though I’m not sure even he knows what it was/is.  Yo, Kev [...]

    Pingback by Blogs for Mitt » Blog Archive » Monday News Roundup — February 12, 2007 @ 3:20 pm

Comments RSS

Subscribe without commenting

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by: WordPress • Template by: Eric • Banner #1, #3, #4 by Stephen Macklin • Banner #2 by Mark RaynerXML