<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cleveland Challenges Ohio Concealed Carry Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/15/cleveland-challenges-ohio-concealed-carry-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/15/cleveland-challenges-ohio-concealed-carry-law/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/15/cleveland-challenges-ohio-concealed-carry-law/#comment-17341</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/15/cleveland-challenges-ohio-concealed-carry-law/#comment-17341</guid>
		<description>Chris you are correct sir, Think of a world without firearms, Thats cool with me but until that day I will stick to my rite as an American. Besides I always practice peace thru well you know the rest, A very wise man once said The AK-47 is like a socket set, Better to have one and not need it, than to not have one and need it. you always need more than one. 
  

             Big warm and fuzzy hugs to all the 2nd Amendment haters, If that goes than you will lose the rest.  Rethink your position because an unarmed populace are slaves,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris you are correct sir, Think of a world without firearms, Thats cool with me but until that day I will stick to my rite as an American. Besides I always practice peace thru well you know the rest, A very wise man once said The AK-47 is like a socket set, Better to have one and not need it, than to not have one and need it. you always need more than one. </p>
<p>             Big warm and fuzzy hugs to all the 2nd Amendment haters, If that goes than you will lose the rest.  Rethink your position because an unarmed populace are slaves,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/15/cleveland-challenges-ohio-concealed-carry-law/#comment-17301</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/15/cleveland-challenges-ohio-concealed-carry-law/#comment-17301</guid>
		<description>Trying to come up with some other response here, but all I can think of is, are you high?

No, I understand, you are a rational, but ignorant and naive idealist. That&#039;s OK, so long as you are never actually allowed to make decisions effecting other peoples lives.

The second amendment has a very clear, and very important purpose. All men have the right to defend themselves from harm or opression; through whatever means necessary up to and including lethal force; be it by other individuals, or by the state. No law may take away that right. No society may say that right is invalid, unnecessary, or &quot;uncivilized&quot;. 

That right is fundamental to our nature as sentient persons.

The second amendment recognizes that right, and specifically limits the governments ability to attempt to infringe upon it. 

Some may say that such a right is unnecessary; they are wrong. If you want proof you need not look far.

The only thing that ensures against genocide, is an armed, and educated populace. The Warsaw ghetto should be all the example you ever need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to come up with some other response here, but all I can think of is, are you high?</p>
<p>No, I understand, you are a rational, but ignorant and naive idealist. That&#8217;s OK, so long as you are never actually allowed to make decisions effecting other peoples lives.</p>
<p>The second amendment has a very clear, and very important purpose. All men have the right to defend themselves from harm or opression; through whatever means necessary up to and including lethal force; be it by other individuals, or by the state. No law may take away that right. No society may say that right is invalid, unnecessary, or &#8220;uncivilized&#8221;. </p>
<p>That right is fundamental to our nature as sentient persons.</p>
<p>The second amendment recognizes that right, and specifically limits the governments ability to attempt to infringe upon it. </p>
<p>Some may say that such a right is unnecessary; they are wrong. If you want proof you need not look far.</p>
<p>The only thing that ensures against genocide, is an armed, and educated populace. The Warsaw ghetto should be all the example you ever need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badthing_1</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/15/cleveland-challenges-ohio-concealed-carry-law/#comment-17269</link>
		<dc:creator>Badthing_1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/15/cleveland-challenges-ohio-concealed-carry-law/#comment-17269</guid>
		<description>If I could re-write the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, this is precisely what I would love to see:  

&quot;We, the people of the United States, in order that we shall have the right to preserve a State free for all races, shall achieve this end by the use of less-lethal weaponry only for our continued survival as human beings. This free State entails our personal self-defense as well as our right to our food consumption. In keeping with current government law, if we so choose to possess a less-lethal weapon (be it either upon our persons or within our private homes), we are obligated to store these aforementioned weapons plus any ammo relating to its use in a manner which will serve to protect the welfare of a minor child. To further secure our persons, we have the right to wear bullet-proof body armour, plus live in bullet-proof houses as well as drive bullet-proof vehicles.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could re-write the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, this is precisely what I would love to see:  </p>
<p>&#8220;We, the people of the United States, in order that we shall have the right to preserve a State free for all races, shall achieve this end by the use of less-lethal weaponry only for our continued survival as human beings. This free State entails our personal self-defense as well as our right to our food consumption. In keeping with current government law, if we so choose to possess a less-lethal weapon (be it either upon our persons or within our private homes), we are obligated to store these aforementioned weapons plus any ammo relating to its use in a manner which will serve to protect the welfare of a minor child. To further secure our persons, we have the right to wear bullet-proof body armour, plus live in bullet-proof houses as well as drive bullet-proof vehicles.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

