And if they really wanted to take my gun, then should we as a country not defend ourselves against a tyrannical government.

The only way the government would get my gun is if they were willing to take it from my cold hands.

The problem with gun control is that this guy was determined. While it looks like he bought these guns legally, anyone who is willing to go shoot 40-50+ people is going to find a way to buy a gun illegally if necessary. However, the more restrictions and hoops you place on the purchase of guns legally, the more you deter regular law-abiding citizens without mental problems from purchasing one.

But your questions about campus security is a non-starter. My whole point in writing this article is that you can’t expect government to protect you. Police really aren’t there to protect you from crimes as they occur (although they will if they can), and to have enough police to do that job would cost an astronomical sum to guard against a very rare threat.

Virginia Tech can’t afford to hire enough campus security to have stopped this. They may have made some mistakes in the way they handled the situation (not responding properly to the first shootings in the dormitory helped enable the second two hours later), but the fact is that the rules making VT a “gun-free zone” obviously didn’t work.

Note that I’m not suggesting arming all the students. As I pointed out, I’m not sure that allowing CCW would have stopped this, because you never know whether any of the students or professors in that building would have been carrying that day. I’m not saying that we force everyone to carry, just that we allow those people who have taken the time and effort to become proficient with firearms the freedom to carry.

This was a horrible tragedy, and the blame for it lies squarely with the shooter. But it’s important to look at this and see if there are lessons to be learned.

Certainly true. But, then again, many people deserve to be shot or, at least, to be threatened with a shooting.

There’s also not much evidence to support gun bans as a way to make access dificult for criminals. After all, if a man decides to kill another, he’s hardly going to worry about the proper papers for his weapon of choice.

this freedom to protect yourself second amendment stuff doesn’t seem to have worked that well

It works well for hundreds of thousands of people every year. When something like Va Tech happens, obviously, it’s big news. When a shopkeeper whips out a weapon and scares off a couple of muggers, it’s not news. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. Look up the crime defense statistics on the US Department of Justice.

Moreover, the opposite of the Second Amendment also doesn’t work. Washington is a wretched crime-ridden craphole, and it has had a nearly-complete ban on guns for decades.

- Josh

regards

kn

Most people will cry for gun control. But honestly is that really the answer ? Give people the chance to defend themselves is the real answer.

I think most people who would attempt to do something of this nature would think at least twice if they knew other people around them are armed.

I am a strong supporter of CCW permits (Concealed Carry Weapon) and that all states should issue them upon request.

In 2006 I believe VT banned CCW permit holders from carrying weapons onto Campus.

Unfortunately in the world we live in today these things happen, and we have to be prepared for these things. Think of all the time that passed from 1 shooting to the next 2 hours !!! That was not enough time for Law Enforcement to do anything. I want my life to be protected by the person it means most to ME !!!

No arguements about my post. This is what I believe and its not up for debate. I wish all those affected my best wishes !! 2nd Amendment for All !

I’m as liberal as anyone else who may comment here, but the numbers, and just plain logic tells us that not allowing people to protect themselves makes them powerless against those who are willing to break the law to have them. When the criminals possess all the fire power, you’re in trouble.

If more guns equals more crime, then why does crime drop when different US states loosen their gun control laws? If so, then why isn’t Finland, Switzerland, or Israel drowning in waves of crime? If more guns equals less crime, then why has gun crime skyrocketed in the wake of the UK gun ban?

Guns prevent much more crime than they facilitate, is the easiest answer.

- Josh

Deep sympathy to the bereaved , curses on the policos of all colours who will use this incident for their own ends.

peace out.

the right to bear arms is insured in the constitution, and i believe every citizen should have this right. however, i do NOT believe ANYONE should have the right to conceal arms. if all of us were permitted to carry a gun in plain sight, wherever we go, and all of us were required to be trained in the weapon’s basic use, i think we would all feel a bit safer, although i admit this idea might be a bit counter-intuitive.

the worst-case scenario i see with such a policy, is if random checks for concealed weapons were conducted.

if everyone could see that everyone carried a potentially deadly weapon, and no one knew how many others were proficient in said weapon, i think the temptation to use such weapons would decrease. as things stand, i believe the prohibitions merely encourage the unlawful and imbalanced to, as it were, “buck the system” and use weapons when and where they could.

again, i feel it is likely that those same would be deterred if they knew that others, following the law, were able to shoot them dead before being able to fire.

as to full disclosure, i have only once in my life pointed a firearm at another person. it was a shotgun, it was unloaded, and i expect i couldn’t have hit the offender if i tried — in defense of an animal sanctuary against potential poachers.

truth be told, i expect ANY gun i might ever carry would be unloaded.

the possible poachers didn’t know that. would anyone?

A pipe wrench. It can be used to break windows, it can be used to shear pins in a bolt, it can be used to knock off a knob. Not to mention, if you have coveralls and a black cap/ski mask, it makes a perfect disguise.

It also makes a deadly weapon. The heft in one of those things can break a skull, or jar someones bat out of their hands. Best defense against a professional crook wielding a pipe wrench is a gun.

That graph is a skewed representation of what you are trying to prove.

First, there is no breakdown of murder by weapon type. Even if all were guns, which they are not, most studies saying guns are bad, that I have read, fail to take into account how many guns used for murder were obtained by legal means versus illegal means.
In addition, they fail to notice other enviromental and socio economic factors.

Is the murder rate higher due to poor and cramped living conditions? Is it lower because it is a high class neighborhood? Are more guns used at certain economic levels? Are those guns used also obtained legally?

I personally know about 9 people who conceal and carry. I am considering getting CCW for both myself and my wife.

Take away guns? What’s next? Knives? Aren’t they having serious problems with knives in Britain?
Take away knives? I can get a bat. Or a pipe. Or a brick. I have really large hands.

And if I can get those things, I am sure someone with less honorable intentions can get them.

Paul, criminals don’t pay attention to laws. How hard is this to understand? 110 million firearms in the US, and one person every couple of years goes on a mass shooting with one or two of them. Yet thousands will defend themselves merely by brandishing and not even firing a weapon.