Comments on: Virginia Legislators Target Neal Boortz

By: Kevin Damon

Kevin Damon — Thu, 03 May 2007 15:38:03 +0000

Boortz’s comments were not disgsuting but I believe I can explain the actions of the students and it’s quite a simple matter: through thirteen years of primary and secondary education students are taught that when assaulted they should stand by and wait for the authorities to arrive and handle the situation. The students do this because school authorities will punish the perpetrator and the victim equally if this is not done. Why? Because it is easier for the administrators to be a disservice to their students than it is to handle these incidents fairly. The students did exactly what they were taught to do and they paid dearly for it.

By: Big Gay Al

Big Gay Al — Thu, 03 May 2007 14:11:18 +0000

Thanks for the link Oscar. I’ve been contacting all those advertisers and asking to keep on sponsoring Neal’s radio show.

While I think he could have been a little more “diplomatic” in his comments, I also think he was right on target. America has become “wussified” in that we are taught to rely on someone else in times of crisis.

Women are told, in the event of a rape attack, “don’t fight back, better to be a live victim.” Yet, studies show, those who fight back have a better chance of surviving, even if they lose the fight. They also have a higher level of self esteem.

We are always told, if someone is after you, trying to kill or maim you, call the police. Sure, go ahead, dial 911, while someone is breaking down your door. The police will probably show up in time to clean up the mess.

Even if only 10 students had rushed the homicidal maniac, they had a pretty good chance of taking him down. And if only ONE student had been legally armed, we would not likely be talking about 32 victims, but most likely, a much lower number, and a hero.

Instead, we have 32 “good victims,” which does include a few heroes who stood their ground so others could run away.

By: Oscar Lewis

Oscar Lewis — Thu, 03 May 2007 13:03:35 +0000

If you want to hear Mr. Boortz’s many disgusting comments on this matter, go to my web site. On it you will be able to read, listen and view a video.

http://nukular-waste.tripod.com/Boortz/Boortz.htm

Sincerely,
Oscar Lewis

By: trumpetbob15

trumpetbob15 — Wed, 02 May 2007 23:19:32 +0000

Now if only the Dixie Chicks would fly to London and talk about Boortz being censored. That is the problem here. Individual stations can decide to stop carrying a show; the government cannot.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Wed, 02 May 2007 21:11:03 +0000

The complaint is bogus. Here is what Mr. Boor(t)z said on-line

When has that ever stopped a politician?

By: tkc

tkc — Wed, 02 May 2007 19:14:22 +0000

The complaint is bogus. Here is what Mr. Boorz said on-line, “Lambs for the slaughter

One more thing. I have a question here. No answer .. just a question. Why didn’t some of these students fight back? How in the hell do you line students up against a wall (if that’s the way it played out) and start picking them off one by one without the students turning on you? You have a choice. Try to rush the killer and get his gun, or stand there and wait to be shot. I would love to hear from some of you who have insight into situations such as this. Was there just not enough time to react? Were they paralyzed with fear? Were they waiting for someone else to take action? Sorry .. I just don’t understand.”

http://boortz.com/nuze/200704/04172007.html

I believe the same question was raised here. Simply put, “Why did no one fight back?”
This is not hate mongering.

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 02 May 2007 17:48:14 +0000

Hell, when politicasn AREN’T complaining, I start getting worried.

Besides, Boortz was right. Deep in what passes for their little politician souls, they know it; and are angry at him for exposing them for the cowards they are, nothing more.