<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Look At Our 2008 Options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pacer</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29608</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It doesnâ€™t matter if he wins or loses, its completely irrelevant&quot;

That&#039;s just silly.  Ron Paul&#039;s message runs right into the teeth of almost every special interest that&#039;s pulling the strings of our government today.  If Ron Paul does not win, the special interests win--and it will be back to business as usual in Washington.  Since Ross Perot, the ballot has offered only a choice between different subsets of special interests, never an option for driving these interests out of a process that&#039;s supposed to be strictly about the people and their republic.

These are powerful corruptors, and only a president of the strongest principles could possibly resist them.  And only a president with the strongest core message (the Constitution) can give the other policymakers the strength to resist as well.  So I would say it is critically relevant whether Ron Paul wins or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It doesnâ€™t matter if he wins or loses, its completely irrelevant&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just silly.  Ron Paul&#8217;s message runs right into the teeth of almost every special interest that&#8217;s pulling the strings of our government today.  If Ron Paul does not win, the special interests win&#8211;and it will be back to business as usual in Washington.  Since Ross Perot, the ballot has offered only a choice between different subsets of special interests, never an option for driving these interests out of a process that&#8217;s supposed to be strictly about the people and their republic.</p>
<p>These are powerful corruptors, and only a president of the strongest principles could possibly resist them.  And only a president with the strongest core message (the Constitution) can give the other policymakers the strength to resist as well.  So I would say it is critically relevant whether Ron Paul wins or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29579</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thank you science.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: science</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29577</link>
		<dc:creator>science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think some of you are missing the point.  It doesn&#039;t matter if he wins or loses, its completely irrelevant; what matters is the impact he makes on the political scene.  The more votes he gets, the more of an impact he makes, the more the mainstream politicians and voters will look and say &quot;this is a viable option, this can actually happen&quot;.  Its not an all-or-nothing affair.  We can build a future with a minority of votes, thats the message.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some of you are missing the point.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if he wins or loses, its completely irrelevant; what matters is the impact he makes on the political scene.  The more votes he gets, the more of an impact he makes, the more the mainstream politicians and voters will look and say &#8220;this is a viable option, this can actually happen&#8221;.  Its not an all-or-nothing affair.  We can build a future with a minority of votes, thats the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Purinton</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29576</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Purinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Knock it off&quot; wrote: &quot;If you are going to say he wonâ€™t win then just do everyone a favor and keep your opinion to yourself or just stop publicizing it.&quot;

This is the same argument used to silence those who oppose the war, by accusing them of endangering and demoralizing the troops.

It has always been crucial to the success of the freedom movement that people speak the truth as they see it, when they see it. Don&#039;t wait till later. Speak up now, and speak the truth.

What we should fight are lies of commission and lies of omission. The truth is on our side -- we have nothing to fear from it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Knock it off&#8221; wrote: &#8220;If you are going to say he wonâ€™t win then just do everyone a favor and keep your opinion to yourself or just stop publicizing it.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the same argument used to silence those who oppose the war, by accusing them of endangering and demoralizing the troops.</p>
<p>It has always been crucial to the success of the freedom movement that people speak the truth as they see it, when they see it. Don&#8217;t wait till later. Speak up now, and speak the truth.</p>
<p>What we should fight are lies of commission and lies of omission. The truth is on our side &#8212; we have nothing to fear from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Houston</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29552</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 05:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The simple fact is, that Ron paul has gotten into more debates as a Republican primary candidate, than all the Libertarian presidential candidates put together.

If FRudy McRomneyson, is the GOP nominee, then it will be time to support a Libertarian candidate, until then, Ron Paul is the most Libertarian candidate in politics right now.

Finally, I don&#039;t really care which libertarian get the Libertarian nomination, they will be just fine with me, and short of a Ron Paul option as the GOP candidate, I will happily vote for any of them.

Used to be, the chances of a libertarian candidate winning were zero and none.  Ron Paul&#039;s chances are at least slim and none.  His chances improve to &quot;just maybe&quot; if we can all get behind him and push real real hard.

Laters]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The simple fact is, that Ron paul has gotten into more debates as a Republican primary candidate, than all the Libertarian presidential candidates put together.</p>
<p>If FRudy McRomneyson, is the GOP nominee, then it will be time to support a Libertarian candidate, until then, Ron Paul is the most Libertarian candidate in politics right now.</p>
<p>Finally, I don&#8217;t really care which libertarian get the Libertarian nomination, they will be just fine with me, and short of a Ron Paul option as the GOP candidate, I will happily vote for any of them.</p>
<p>Used to be, the chances of a libertarian candidate winning were zero and none.  Ron Paul&#8217;s chances are at least slim and none.  His chances improve to &#8220;just maybe&#8221; if we can all get behind him and push real real hard.</p>
<p>Laters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knock it off...</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29551</link>
		<dc:creator>Knock it off...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;But what Iâ€™m fighting against is the traditional libertarian temptation to give up and vote for a mainstream democrat and republican.&quot;

What I simply am asking is that the Libertarians realize that Ron Paul may not be 100% in the mold they expect (I actually think he is more Libertarian than most Libertarians I&#039;ve met though). At the same time, when they wait around for the right candidate they end up waiting a long time and fielding someone who TRULY doesn&#039;t have a chance of winning.

Ron Paul does have a chance and it&#039;s a good chance. The so-called front runners are burning through cash and parrotiing the same old tired rhetoric. Ron Paul&#039;s thoughts and record are becoming more mainstream. When I ask people to look into Dr.Paul they invariably come back to me and affirm that they&#039;d vote for him. This is not what you&#039;d expect from a candiate with &quot;no chance&quot; of winning. All it means is his exposure needs to be ramped up. The Internet is doing that very cheaply and well and we need to support him and his candidacy and that doesn&#039;t mean speaking ill of his chances.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But what Iâ€™m fighting against is the traditional libertarian temptation to give up and vote for a mainstream democrat and republican.&#8221;</p>
<p>What I simply am asking is that the Libertarians realize that Ron Paul may not be 100% in the mold they expect (I actually think he is more Libertarian than most Libertarians I&#8217;ve met though). At the same time, when they wait around for the right candidate they end up waiting a long time and fielding someone who TRULY doesn&#8217;t have a chance of winning.</p>
<p>Ron Paul does have a chance and it&#8217;s a good chance. The so-called front runners are burning through cash and parrotiing the same old tired rhetoric. Ron Paul&#8217;s thoughts and record are becoming more mainstream. When I ask people to look into Dr.Paul they invariably come back to me and affirm that they&#8217;d vote for him. This is not what you&#8217;d expect from a candiate with &#8220;no chance&#8221; of winning. All it means is his exposure needs to be ramped up. The Internet is doing that very cheaply and well and we need to support him and his candidacy and that doesn&#8217;t mean speaking ill of his chances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29549</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t you see, though, now is the time to believe and build support for Dr. Paul?

And if it doesn&#039;t work out--for any number of reasons--you can always choose later to settle for the two party default position. 

All it takes is enough people thinking outside the box: you KNOW that this man&#039;s ethic IS the main-stream American ethic, based primarily on liberty. 

He can win.  Expect a lot of flack from various invested quarters for various, mostly, phony reasons.  Blow&#039;em off.  The present establishment on the right or the left is scared to death of this man and what he represents.  Let&#039;s give them something more to angst over!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you see, though, now is the time to believe and build support for Dr. Paul?</p>
<p>And if it doesn&#8217;t work out&#8211;for any number of reasons&#8211;you can always choose later to settle for the two party default position. </p>
<p>All it takes is enough people thinking outside the box: you KNOW that this man&#8217;s ethic IS the main-stream American ethic, based primarily on liberty. </p>
<p>He can win.  Expect a lot of flack from various invested quarters for various, mostly, phony reasons.  Blow&#8217;em off.  The present establishment on the right or the left is scared to death of this man and what he represents.  Let&#8217;s give them something more to angst over!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29544</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am confident in him.  What I&#039;m not confident in is the American ability to see through the polished turds that Obama and Giuliani are shoving down peoples&#039; throats.

I&#039;ve already signed up for the next local meetup and will ask there about ways to help out his campaign.

But what I&#039;m fighting against is the traditional libertarian temptation to give up and vote for a mainstream democrat and republican.

If I got all &quot;OMG he&#039;s going to WINZORZ&quot; I&#039;d just be dismissed as yet another crackpot and fanboy.  

Which I&#039;m not.

But I&#039;m tired of us throwing our votes away.  And the fact of the matter is most libertarians don&#039;t think candidates they agree with on most issues can win.  What I&#039;m trying to do is give people a reason to vote for those candidates anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confident in him.  What I&#8217;m not confident in is the American ability to see through the polished turds that Obama and Giuliani are shoving down peoples&#8217; throats.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already signed up for the next local meetup and will ask there about ways to help out his campaign.</p>
<p>But what I&#8217;m fighting against is the traditional libertarian temptation to give up and vote for a mainstream democrat and republican.</p>
<p>If I got all &#8220;OMG he&#8217;s going to WINZORZ&#8221; I&#8217;d just be dismissed as yet another crackpot and fanboy.  </p>
<p>Which I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m tired of us throwing our votes away.  And the fact of the matter is most libertarians don&#8217;t think candidates they agree with on most issues can win.  What I&#8217;m trying to do is give people a reason to vote for those candidates anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knock it off...</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29543</link>
		<dc:creator>Knock it off...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 01:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/06/a-look-at-our-2008-options/#comment-29543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This website is really aggravating me. Look, if you&#039;re Libertarian and making commentary about Dr. Paul do everyone a favor and stop dropping the ol&#039; &quot;I doubt he&#039;ll win, but I&#039;d vote for him&quot; line.

Look, if you&#039;d vote for the guy then don&#039;t assume he won&#039;t win. Work to show confidence in the candidate. If you are going to say he won&#039;t win then just do everyone a favor and keep your opinion to yourself or just stop publicizing it. Whenever commentators say use this ridiculous &quot;he won&#039;t win&quot; attitude it reinforces the belief. 

You&#039;re not showing everyone how smart you are by saying he won&#039;t win.  Everyone knows it&#039;s aready going to be a tough race. You&#039;re only helping his opponents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This website is really aggravating me. Look, if you&#8217;re Libertarian and making commentary about Dr. Paul do everyone a favor and stop dropping the ol&#8217; &#8220;I doubt he&#8217;ll win, but I&#8217;d vote for him&#8221; line.</p>
<p>Look, if you&#8217;d vote for the guy then don&#8217;t assume he won&#8217;t win. Work to show confidence in the candidate. If you are going to say he won&#8217;t win then just do everyone a favor and keep your opinion to yourself or just stop publicizing it. Whenever commentators say use this ridiculous &#8220;he won&#8217;t win&#8221; attitude it reinforces the belief. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re not showing everyone how smart you are by saying he won&#8217;t win.  Everyone knows it&#8217;s aready going to be a tough race. You&#8217;re only helping his opponents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
