Comments on: Faith Based Charity Not Open To The Faithless

By: Neal

Neal — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:41:05 +0000

Well what else do you expect when corporate fascists are appointed to the Supreme Court?

By: C Bowen

C Bowen — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:59:42 +0000

Doug;

You are caught in their trap. A secular gubmint funded operation promotes the religion of socialism just as, in time, a gubmint funded religous organization will promote the religion of socialism.

As none of these funded projects are Constitutional, the powers that be have to create phony things to debate about, and you have fallen for it, debating a wrong on top of a wrong.

By: Harold

Harold — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:38:12 +0000

Everyone plays up the ‘establishment clause’ – and that’s correct, the practice of giving breaks to ‘faith-based’ charities violates that clause.

However, this *decision* is actually about another clause in the First Amendment. “…the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

In one day, Supreme Court Jackass Roberts has pretty much struck down the entire first amendment.

By: george

george — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:29:01 +0000

All I see is 5 perverts, supporting the perversion of the Constitution of the United States. What we can expect in the future is an evangelical FATWA.

It is quite apparent that the “Dumbing down” of the United States has reached the Supreme Court. The United States of America is in trouble, when government employees tell their employers to Shut up and give them money.

By: Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » A Mixed Day for Liberty At The Supreme Court

Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:33:55 +0000

[...] Finally, in Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., the Court agreed with the Bush Administration’s argument that a group of atheists do not have standing to challenge expenditures that are part of President Bush’s faith-based initiatives program. As I pointed out in my post about the case, if taxpayers can’t challenge plainly unconstitutional uses of tax dollars, then who can ?Â [...]