<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;Libertarian Position&#8221; On Gentrification?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30786</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Essential reading for eminent domain:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://mutualist.blogspot.com/2006/12/cockroach-caucuses-and-local-corporate.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stealing from the Poor, Giving to the Rich&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Essential reading for eminent domain:</p>
<p><a href="http://mutualist.blogspot.com/2006/12/cockroach-caucuses-and-local-corporate.html" rel="nofollow">Stealing from the Poor, Giving to the Rich</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmarsh</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30770</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmarsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VRB, That&#039;s a common problem, girlfriends complain of it often :)

There&#039;s a &quot;Team America&quot; pall that gets cast by the outside media about most of New Orleans, but the black areas in particular (the same traits aren&#039;t to be found in the primarily Vietnamese areas, so &quot;minority&quot; doesn&#039;t work.)  You remember the line that went something like, 
[quote]&quot;Before Team America showed up, it was a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles.&quot;[/quote]

When you have direct, personal experience over a decade with New Orleans, you laugh as you hear the media describe it as they have, and cry when people from other states buy it hook, line and sinker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VRB, That&#8217;s a common problem, girlfriends complain of it often :)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a &#8220;Team America&#8221; pall that gets cast by the outside media about most of New Orleans, but the black areas in particular (the same traits aren&#8217;t to be found in the primarily Vietnamese areas, so &#8220;minority&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work.)  You remember the line that went something like,<br />
[quote]&#8220;Before Team America showed up, it was a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles.&#8221;[/quote]</p>
<p>When you have direct, personal experience over a decade with New Orleans, you laugh as you hear the media describe it as they have, and cry when people from other states buy it hook, line and sinker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRB</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30741</link>
		<dc:creator>VRB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jmarsh,
It was more your tone, not so much as your wording.
I know I haven&#039;t seen the neighborhoods that you speak of, but I had heard similar description of my  neighborhood, when it was intended to be destroyed for a highway. We were all supposed to be living in these rundown houses and shacks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jmarsh,<br />
It was more your tone, not so much as your wording.<br />
I know I haven&#8217;t seen the neighborhoods that you speak of, but I had heard similar description of my  neighborhood, when it was intended to be destroyed for a highway. We were all supposed to be living in these rundown houses and shacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmarsh</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30731</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmarsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ack, as much as it pains me to say this, if you&#039;re going to argue government has no role in public health, I&#039;m obviously not going to convince you otherwise.  I do have some dead horses I&#039;d like to stack on my property five feet from a bus stop, though.  You&#039;re also ignoring the massive amount of money sitting in the vote buying scheme otherwise known as &quot;road home.&quot;  It may take me five years to recover a firearm from a government agency, it&#039;ll take some time before people get more free taxpayer money (once Blanco is no longer governor, it will probably happen within 6 months.)

The primary point of my post was to dispute the picture painted by Racewire and the source links.  I don&#039;t have any problems with houses of ill repute or with poor people.  There is also something we&#039;re losing sight of (my bad), which is probably the result of a poorly worded original article... [b]3,000 units of affordable housing in the cityâ€™s housing projects[/b].  That seems to implicate those 3,000 units were *not* private property to begin with.  Most of the housing in the 9th was private property, so I believe they&#039;re getting things confused by using neighborhood tags interchangeably.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack, as much as it pains me to say this, if you&#8217;re going to argue government has no role in public health, I&#8217;m obviously not going to convince you otherwise.  I do have some dead horses I&#8217;d like to stack on my property five feet from a bus stop, though.  You&#8217;re also ignoring the massive amount of money sitting in the vote buying scheme otherwise known as &#8220;road home.&#8221;  It may take me five years to recover a firearm from a government agency, it&#8217;ll take some time before people get more free taxpayer money (once Blanco is no longer governor, it will probably happen within 6 months.)</p>
<p>The primary point of my post was to dispute the picture painted by Racewire and the source links.  I don&#8217;t have any problems with houses of ill repute or with poor people.  There is also something we&#8217;re losing sight of (my bad), which is probably the result of a poorly worded original article&#8230; [b]3,000 units of affordable housing in the cityâ€™s housing projects[/b].  That seems to implicate those 3,000 units were *not* private property to begin with.  Most of the housing in the 9th was private property, so I believe they&#8217;re getting things confused by using neighborhood tags interchangeably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRB</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30709</link>
		<dc:creator>VRB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But it is their property, Jmarsh. 
That shack as you called it was shelter to someone. I guess  you would have wish they all would have washed out to sea and you would not have to look at poor people or the way they live. An since when did New Orleans have any shame in whorehouses or is it different if they are in the French Quarter?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it is their property, Jmarsh.<br />
That shack as you called it was shelter to someone. I guess  you would have wish they all would have washed out to sea and you would not have to look at poor people or the way they live. An since when did New Orleans have any shame in whorehouses or is it different if they are in the French Quarter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmarsh</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30707</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmarsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Then there was the plan to raze 3,000 units of affordable housing in the cityâ€™s housing projects, which many Black New Orleanians called home, even though they were in relatively good shape.&quot;

Someone is on the special flavor of crack.  I&#039;ve been through, around, and in nearly every &quot;neighborhood&quot; southwest of the CBD and none of the projects could be categorized as in relatively good shape with a straight face.

Nearly every link through that article is a puff piece that romanticizes utter garbage.  Shotgun shacks that have a &quot;link to the past&quot; because they still have original clapboard siding, or someone famous ran a whorehouse there?  Give me a break.  The city and FEMA *did* make attempts to warn the owners, and they most certainly could view their property before December.  If we can all agree that a house burned to the framing represents &quot;blight&quot;, then what was left of the 9th ward and St. Bernard parish certainly fits the definition.

I dislike government takings as much as the next libertarian, but this argument is being colored with way too much fictional history by outsiders.  These homes, were not exactly in the greatest shape to begin with precisely because their owners would not, or could not provide for their effective upkeep.  This would seemingly preclude said homeowners from being able to gut and rebuild their home, even provided the money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Then there was the plan to raze 3,000 units of affordable housing in the cityâ€™s housing projects, which many Black New Orleanians called home, even though they were in relatively good shape.&#8221;</p>
<p>Someone is on the special flavor of crack.  I&#8217;ve been through, around, and in nearly every &#8220;neighborhood&#8221; southwest of the CBD and none of the projects could be categorized as in relatively good shape with a straight face.</p>
<p>Nearly every link through that article is a puff piece that romanticizes utter garbage.  Shotgun shacks that have a &#8220;link to the past&#8221; because they still have original clapboard siding, or someone famous ran a whorehouse there?  Give me a break.  The city and FEMA *did* make attempts to warn the owners, and they most certainly could view their property before December.  If we can all agree that a house burned to the framing represents &#8220;blight&#8221;, then what was left of the 9th ward and St. Bernard parish certainly fits the definition.</p>
<p>I dislike government takings as much as the next libertarian, but this argument is being colored with way too much fictional history by outsiders.  These homes, were not exactly in the greatest shape to begin with precisely because their owners would not, or could not provide for their effective upkeep.  This would seemingly preclude said homeowners from being able to gut and rebuild their home, even provided the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarran</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30706</link>
		<dc:creator>tarran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear, hear!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30691</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/25/the-libertarian-position-on-gentrification/#comment-30691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bravo!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bravo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
