<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Our Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/26/in-our-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/26/in-our-name/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/26/in-our-name/#comment-30785</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/26/in-our-name/#comment-30785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Donâ€™t get me wrong, I see the value in a centralized agency for gathering and evaluating intelligence on possible foreign threats&lt;/i&gt;

And if you think you can limit it to that, you&#039;re a colossal fool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Donâ€™t get me wrong, I see the value in a centralized agency for gathering and evaluating intelligence on possible foreign threats</i></p>
<p>And if you think you can limit it to that, you&#8217;re a colossal fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T F Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/26/in-our-name/#comment-30782</link>
		<dc:creator>T F Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/26/in-our-name/#comment-30782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must have fallen off a turnip truck; does this mean we can&#039;t trust our government 100%.  I had to take my baseball cap off to cover my heart while whistling the Star Spangled Banner.  lol from the dark side.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have fallen off a turnip truck; does this mean we can&#8217;t trust our government 100%.  I had to take my baseball cap off to cover my heart while whistling the Star Spangled Banner.  lol from the dark side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UCrawford</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/26/in-our-name/#comment-30767</link>
		<dc:creator>UCrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/26/in-our-name/#comment-30767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Church Committee actually did a lot to react against the abuses by the CIA.  In fact, as a result of the Senate&#039;s investigation it was pretty much impossible for our intel services to provide information to police forces and vice versa, until 9/11 anyway (the inability to share data was one of the reasons some of the hijackers were able to slip through).  While I&#039;d argue that the Church Committee overreacted to what happened by placing some overly harsh restrictions on our intelligence services, I&#039;d say that most of the committee&#039;s actions were justified, and that many of the liberties Bush is attempting to take in circumventing those restrictions aren&#039;t really doing us any favors...either in the current &quot;War on Terror&quot; or in our future.  

As I see it, a society that believes it&#039;s acceptable for our leader to basically legalize torture and deprive suspects of their rights, whether those tactics are applied to U.S. citizens or foreign detainees, is hardly a society that embodies the rule of law or the concept of individual liberty.  The Bush administration&#039;s done a lot to push us back towards the bad old days...and a large number of people seem more than happy to let him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Church Committee actually did a lot to react against the abuses by the CIA.  In fact, as a result of the Senate&#8217;s investigation it was pretty much impossible for our intel services to provide information to police forces and vice versa, until 9/11 anyway (the inability to share data was one of the reasons some of the hijackers were able to slip through).  While I&#8217;d argue that the Church Committee overreacted to what happened by placing some overly harsh restrictions on our intelligence services, I&#8217;d say that most of the committee&#8217;s actions were justified, and that many of the liberties Bush is attempting to take in circumventing those restrictions aren&#8217;t really doing us any favors&#8230;either in the current &#8220;War on Terror&#8221; or in our future.  </p>
<p>As I see it, a society that believes it&#8217;s acceptable for our leader to basically legalize torture and deprive suspects of their rights, whether those tactics are applied to U.S. citizens or foreign detainees, is hardly a society that embodies the rule of law or the concept of individual liberty.  The Bush administration&#8217;s done a lot to push us back towards the bad old days&#8230;and a large number of people seem more than happy to let him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
