<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Severely Limits Affirmative Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-31033</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-31033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Simply because the school districts may seek a worthy goal doesn&#039;t mean that they are free to discriminate on the basis of race to achieve it.&quot;

How is this a bad thing?

People are not allowed to discriminate based on race, yet when the Supreme Court says &quot;Don&#039;t discriminate based on race.&quot; People get angry???

I am so confused.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Simply because the school districts may seek a worthy goal doesn&#8217;t mean that they are free to discriminate on the basis of race to achieve it.&#8221;</p>
<p>How is this a bad thing?</p>
<p>People are not allowed to discriminate based on race, yet when the Supreme Court says &#8220;Don&#8217;t discriminate based on race.&#8221; People get angry???</p>
<p>I am so confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30977</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Brown v Board of Education&#039;s Original Intent...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Brown decision, perhaps more than any other event in our history, gave rise to the modern conservative movement....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Brown v Board of Education&#8217;s Original Intent&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Brown decision, perhaps more than any other event in our history, gave rise to the modern conservative movement&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRB</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30912</link>
		<dc:creator>VRB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know if getting into a school depended on a lottery system, some whites would still complain that blacks were allowed to participate. 
When the clock turns back, next time, there may not be a Martin Luther King Jr. to lead us. Thoes that do will not give a sh*t how high minded the strict constitutionalist were.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know if getting into a school depended on a lottery system, some whites would still complain that blacks were allowed to participate.<br />
When the clock turns back, next time, there may not be a Martin Luther King Jr. to lead us. Thoes that do will not give a sh*t how high minded the strict constitutionalist were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Debate Link</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30904</link>
		<dc:creator>The Debate Link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Desegregation Opinions: Blogs and Media React...&lt;/strong&gt;

[This is a round-up post on the just-released decisions striking down Seattle and Louisville&#039;s desegregation plans. Other posts in the series:

Reaction to C.J. Roberts&#039; opinion

Reaction to Justice Stevens&#039; dissent

Reaction to Justice Kenned...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Desegregation Opinions: Blogs and Media React&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[This is a round-up post on the just-released decisions striking down Seattle and Louisville&#8217;s desegregation plans. Other posts in the series:</p>
<p>Reaction to C.J. Roberts&#8217; opinion</p>
<p>Reaction to Justice Stevens&#8217; dissent</p>
<p>Reaction to Justice Kenned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mataconis</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30894</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron,

Count me among those who questions the value of this so-called &quot;diversity&quot;

But whether it&#039;s a good idea isn&#039;t the issue. The 14th Amendment is clear on what the government cannot do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron,</p>
<p>Count me among those who questions the value of this so-called &#8220;diversity&#8221;</p>
<p>But whether it&#8217;s a good idea isn&#8217;t the issue. The 14th Amendment is clear on what the government cannot do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron stratton</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30893</link>
		<dc:creator>ron stratton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/06/28/supreme-court-severely-limits-affirmative-action/#comment-30893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If districts are not to use race as a factor in achieving diversity, what are they supposed to use? Where is Solomon when we need him.

   Probably some will say that diversity is not a stated goal of our government but preventing discrimination in the disbursing of government services is.

   Sounds simple until one tries to get that concept into law.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If districts are not to use race as a factor in achieving diversity, what are they supposed to use? Where is Solomon when we need him.</p>
<p>   Probably some will say that diversity is not a stated goal of our government but preventing discrimination in the disbursing of government services is.</p>
<p>   Sounds simple until one tries to get that concept into law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
