Thoughts, essays, and writings on Liberty. Written by the heirs of Patrick Henry.

“It only stands to reason that where there's sacrifice, there's someone collecting the sacrificial offerings. Where there's service, there is someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice is speaking of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master.”     Ayn Rand

July 10, 2007

The Republican Party’s Gay Problem

by Doug Mataconis

Nate Nelson at GOP Progress writes about what may be one of the more insurmountable problems the Republican Party will face in 2008:

The Republican Party needs to get over its gay problem. I’m not saying that Republicans should capitulate to every whim of the so-called gay rights movement, much of which is just a front for the left. Reasonable people can and should disagree on certain issues. As a gay man, I disagree with the gay rights movement on a number of issues. For example, I don’t believe in hate crime legislation for gays and lesbians or for anyone else; I don’t think we should engage in social experimentation with the military during a time of war by repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell; and I don’t think that same-sex marriage should be judicially imposed upon the states, but that it should instead be worked out by state legislatures. We should have reasonable debate about these issues without lightly throwing around words like “homophobia” and “heterosexism.” But with that said, there is homophobia and heterosexism within the Republican Party, and it needs to be addressed if Republicans really have any interest in being the Big Tent party.

Without exception, the anti-gay sentiment within the Republican Party comes from those who cannot accept that people will believe and behave differently than they do. These are the people who believe that consensual sex between gay and lesbian adults should still be criminalized, simply because their interpretation of Christian scriptures tells them that it is wrong. In this, they are no different than the Islamic extremists who would impose shari’a upon the world. These are the people who believe, contrary to overwhelming medical and psychological evidence, that a homosexual orientation can be changed and who encourage gays and lesbians to seek alteration of their sexual orientation. In this, they are the ones who destroy families, by encouraging men like Gene Robinson and Jim McGreevey to live a lie, a lie that they will inevitably fail to live with eventually. They share in the responsibility for the destruction of families that results when gays and lesbians are forced to admit their sexual orientation to heterosexual spouses and to their children. These are the people who truly do hate gays and lesbians, the people who would disown even their own children if they came to them and told them that they are gay.

In other words, the problem in the GOP is with those who cannot accept that people have the right to live their lives as they wish to live them. It comes from the authoritarians who wish to impose their own vision of what the proper social order is on the rest of society.

And the salvation, it would seem, would be in those who accept the principle that what my neighbor does in the private life causes me no harm.

That used to be what Republicans stood for, until the Christianists and authoritarians came into power.

TrackBack URI: http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/07/10/the-republican-partys-gay-problem/trackback/
Read more posts from
• • •

6 Comments

  1. *Sigh*

    As a practicing Catholic Christian, it disappoints me to see my religion associated with authoritarianism. What I do in my bedroom is a problem for me, God, and maybe the church that I choose to belong to; not the business of the state.

    Comment by Ryan — July 11, 2007 @ 12:13 am
  2. it disappoints me to see my religion associated with authoritarianism.

    What organized religion isn’t a vehicle for authoritarianism?

    Comment by js290 — July 11, 2007 @ 6:29 am
  3. I don’t suppose you’ll be working for the repeal of existing hate crimes legislation any time soon, will you?

    Comment by George — July 11, 2007 @ 8:48 am
  4. I just watched a documentary on the Nazi treatment of homosexuals, and the parallels to the Republicy party are clear — I do not believe that cocaine-head, entitled rich boy Bush, nor gay grandpa Cheney (like Hitler) have personal problems with gays who walk their totalitarian line; however, since they cannot afford to vilify jews or blakcs, gays are next. Their intention to unite a voting block of Christites using social panic surrounding Jesus’ hatred for gays was a ringing success.

    Comment by Tony Wichowski — July 11, 2007 @ 10:56 am
  5. I should clarify; my religion can be authoritarian inside of itself if it wants to be (I may not like it but I chose to join), but I wish it would stay away from the state.

    Comment by Ryan — July 11, 2007 @ 12:26 pm
  6. And the salvation, it would seem, would be in those who accept the principle that what my neighbor does in the private life causes me no harm.

    That used to be what Republicans stood for, until the Christianists and authoritarians came into power.

    I must have slept and missed this magical social liberal era of the Republican Party. Was this the Coolidge Administration or something?

    Comment by Joshua Holmes — July 11, 2007 @ 8:46 pm

Comments RSS

Subscribe without commenting

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by: WordPress • Template by: Eric • Banner #1, #3, #4 by Stephen Macklin • Banner #2 by Mark RaynerXML