Thoughts, essays, and writings on Liberty. Written by the heirs of Patrick Henry.

“The yeomanry of the country possess the lands, the weight of property, possess arms, and are too strong a body of men to be openly offended - and, therefore, it is urged, they will take care of themselves, that men who shall govern will not dare pay any disrespect to their opinions.”     Richard Henry Lee

July 16, 2007

Parker v. District Of Columbia Headed To The Supreme Court

by Doug Mataconis

Washington, D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty announced today that the city will appeal the Appeals Court decision in Parker v. District of Columbia, which struck down the city’s gun control law:

D.C. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty announced today that the city will appeal to the Supreme Court to uphold a long-time ban on handguns that was overturned by a lower court in March.

“We have made the determination that this law can and should be defended,” Fenty said in a statement.

In a 2-1 decision, a panel of judges for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit found in March that the city’s prohibition against residents keeping handguns in their homes is unconstitutional. The panel’s decision was upheld by the full court in May.

The Supreme Court could, of course, decline to hear the appeal but that seems unlikely given the breadth of the Parker decision and the fact that a split exists in the Circuit on whether the Second Amendment grants an individual or collective right to keep and bear arms.

TrackBack URI: http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/07/16/parker-v-district-of-columbia-headed-to-the-supreme-court/trackback/
Read more posts from
• • •

1 Comment

  1. There is a tricky balance that will have to be addressed in this case. On it’s face, one would expect the activist judges to side with the District in favor of gun control. But, by doing so, they establish a precedent of a state’s (or in the this a federal district’s right)to self determination. For the activist judges of the left, that precedent could be an argument supporting future states’ rights determination on cases regarding everything from abortion to busing- and cause the Roberts court to re-evaluate most of the social activist victories of the Warren Court.

    Comment by Conway — July 27, 2007 @ 9:14 pm

Comments RSS

Subscribe without commenting

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by: WordPress • Template by: Eric • Banner #1, #3, #4 by Stephen Macklin • Banner #2 by Mark RaynerXML