Comments on: Why The Ames Poll Is Irrelevant http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/ Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Joshua Holmes http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34795 Joshua Holmes Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:28:06 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34795 I like the name "Paulestinians". I like the name “Paulestinians”.

]]> By: js290 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34721 js290 Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:35:34 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34721 <blockquote>Check the history of the Ames Poll, it is a proper reflection of the feelings of the electorate at this time.</blockquote> That's a logical fallacy if I've ever seen one...

Check the history of the Ames Poll, it is a proper reflection of the feelings of the electorate at this time.

That’s a logical fallacy if I’ve ever seen one…

]]> By: Bob http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34718 Bob Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:19:50 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34718 Sorry, that should be I don't know anyone who would "bet" against Romney winning Iowa in January. Sorry, that should be I don’t know anyone who would “bet” against Romney winning Iowa in January.

]]> By: Bob http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34712 Bob Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:21:25 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34712 Pat Robertson ended up with the 2nd highest number of delegates to the Convention, so Ames wasn't that far off the mark. I don't anyone who would beat against Romney winning Iowa in January. Pat Robertson ended up with the 2nd highest number of delegates to the Convention, so Ames wasn’t that far off the mark. I don’t anyone who would beat against Romney winning Iowa in January.

]]> By: Doug Mataconis http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34703 Doug Mataconis Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:14:39 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34703 Scott, Yep, you're right. The Ames Poll is 100% accurate. Just ask President Marion (Pat) Robertson. Oh, never mind ;) Scott,

Yep, you’re right.

The Ames Poll is 100% accurate.

Just ask President Marion (Pat) Robertson.

Oh, never mind ;)

]]> By: Scott http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34702 Scott Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:12:41 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34702 John, You can write better than this! I get tired of lazy journalists. Check the history of the Ames Poll, it is a proper reflection of the feelings of the electorate at this time. That may change but Mitt has strength in Iowa. John,
You can write better than this! I get tired of lazy journalists. Check the history of the Ames Poll, it is a proper reflection of the feelings of the electorate at this time. That may change but Mitt has strength in Iowa.

]]> By: Derrick http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34701 Derrick Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:56:57 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/08/12/why-the-ames-poll-is-irrelevant/#comment-34701 But if Ron Turd had come in either second or third, the Paulestinians would be claiming Ames as a major victory. But if Ron Turd had come in either second or third, the Paulestinians would be claiming Ames as a major victory.

]]>