Comments on: Rudy Giuliani Flunks Geography

By: tkc

tkc — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:54:49 +0000

Geography is not the only thing he is failing.

http://pubcrawler.blogspot.com/2007/09/quote-of-day_21.html
Shameless promotion of my own blog. Sorry.

By: Bob

Bob — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:58:52 +0000

I don’t think its a good idea to tie every NATO country to the defense of India if there’s another Pakistan/India or another China/India war. Also have you thought about how Pakistan and Russia are going to react to India being invited to join NATO?
Many NATO members will object to Israel joining. Most western European countries try to keep good relations with the Arab world and would be unwilling to be tied to the defense of Israel. Do we really want to alienate any friends we might have left in that part of the world?
I suspect that Mayor Rudy was more interested in gaining Jewish support than he was in thinking ahead or making foreign policy sense.

By: Scott B.

Scott B. — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:23:33 +0000

Giuliani (and Debarshi’s comment) are right on target (Read Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations). The populations in China and Islamic countries are youthful and growing in power. The West (including America) have aging populations and are slowly becoming less powerful internationally and particularly in Asia. We need to strengthen our alliances. India is a key counterbalance to China’s dominance of the region (much more so than Japan). Most Indians speak English, they have some similarities in their legal system left over by the Brits, and their ties to Russia are weakening as the Russian power wains with its aging and quickly shrinking population. So we should strengthen our alliances with India and Australia. Ultimately we will be forced to do it to counterbalance China, so Giuliani is just thinking ahead.

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:04:51 +0000

Something interesting to consider along these lines is that Australia recently gained the same status as Britain when it comes to military relations and hardware, one step beyond major non-NATO ally.

By: Rob

Rob — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:48:05 +0000

Of course, you could always change the name if that were the only problem with the proposal, but let’s not spoil a good hook over details.

The real question is the NATO mission. It doesn’t have one. And it makes more sense to do away with an organization that lacks a mission than to try to think up a new mission for it that isn’t even particularly relevant to most of its members.

The real problem with Giuliani’s proposal is the same as the problem with his childish essay for FOREIGN AFFAIRS magazine. The whole thesis rests on a mythical War on Terror.

Unquestionably, there are a very great number of terrorist groups in the world today. Some of them are even receiving support from the U.S. govt. But to suggest that these disparate groups constitute some conspiratorial threat to the United States is absurd. After all, some of these terrorist groups are even fighting each other.

You cannot defeat terror. You can only defeat terrorist groups. And when you defeat one, there’s nothing to stop another one from emerging. You can’t win a war on terror any more than you can win a war on crime.

Crime happens. And there will always be someone who lapses into criminal behavior. Likewise there will always be the Timothy McVeighs and the Ted Kuzincskis kicking around, in this country or some other, ready to launch a “terrorist attack” on the United States.

Clearly, the Giuliani rhetoric is all about enhancing the power of the state both domestically and abroad. Giuliani is clearly a sell-out to the military-industrial complex, the Zionist lobby, and the statist ideology of their neo-con lackeys.

By: Chepe Noyon

Chepe Noyon — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:03:37 +0000

I will begin by noting that Mr. Giuliani’s foreign policy ideas, as presented in his essay in Foreign Affairs, are dangerously mistaken. However, on the one idea of expanding NATO, there is some merit in the concept. The argument that NATO should be confined to the North Atlantic would, if applied to the United States of America, exclude Hawaii from statehood.

The issues related to the expansion of NATO are complicated and cut both ways, but the geographical argument is silly.

By: Bob

Bob — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:43:10 +0000

Thank you Mayor Rudy for reminding me why I support Ron Paul and not you. Ron Paul understands foreign policy and you don’t. Why I’m at it Rep. Paul is also right (and you’re wrong) on abortion, gun control, border security, the economy, health care, taxes, spending, the proper role of government, etc. etc.

By: Bob

Bob — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:38:07 +0000

By: alec

alec — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:15:21 +0000

Rudy Giuliani or Vampire Ghouliani?

By: Jono

Jono — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:07:42 +0000

Alliances are based on mutual interests. What interests does continental Europe share with Australia, Japan, Israel, India, and Singapore?

You know..Stuff.

They are all countries ! Lets expand NATO some more.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:30:27 +0000

Debarshi:

its necesary to expand Nato ..in Asia ,sooner or alter a great game will start..its already initiate….its all about chinese dominance,we must have axis of democracy in asia to counter chinese growing might.

Alliances are based on mutual interests. What interests does continental Europe share with Australia, Japan, Israel, India, and Singapore?

By: Buckwheat

Buckwheat — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:20:27 +0000

Giuliani is just another piece of CFR trash.

By: Debarshi Malakar

Debarshi Malakar — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:12:48 +0000

its necesary to expand Nato ..in Asia ,sooner or alter a great game will start..its already initiate….its all about chinese dominance,we must have axis of democracy in asia to counter chinese growing might.