<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saw this one coming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39576</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[somehow if we could all agree on certain wording, this whole fiasco could be ended and we could all move about our lives in an orderly fashion.

Call &quot;marraige&quot; or &quot;Civil union&quot; a &quot;joint circumstance agreement&quot; or something wordy like that and then argue the substantiave points of whether people living as dependents to one another qualify for federal and employment disbursed subsidies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>somehow if we could all agree on certain wording, this whole fiasco could be ended and we could all move about our lives in an orderly fashion.</p>
<p>Call &#8220;marraige&#8221; or &#8220;Civil union&#8221; a &#8220;joint circumstance agreement&#8221; or something wordy like that and then argue the substantiave points of whether people living as dependents to one another qualify for federal and employment disbursed subsidies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dewayne</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39575</link>
		<dc:creator>Dewayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See this 2003 story from out here in Iowa...

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2003/12/13/iowa_judge_causes_stir_in_granting_gay_divorce/

About 2/3 of the way down, you get to the paragraph about how the judge signed the divorce order, *then* realized it was two women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See this 2003 story from out here in Iowa&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2003/12/13/iowa_judge_causes_stir_in_granting_gay_divorce/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2003/12/13/iowa_judge_causes_stir_in_granting_gay_divorce/</a></p>
<p>About 2/3 of the way down, you get to the paragraph about how the judge signed the divorce order, *then* realized it was two women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipEsquire</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39566</link>
		<dc:creator>KipEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A co-equal branch of government vindicating equality under law, upholding constitutional principles and thwarting the tyranny of the majority?

Oh the horror...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A co-equal branch of government vindicating equality under law, upholding constitutional principles and thwarting the tyranny of the majority?</p>
<p>Oh the horror&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39495</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;effectively re-writing the laws through judicial activism (and yes, that is very explicitly what is happening) is both morally wrong (because it abrogates the process), and a practical disaster.&lt;/i&gt;

Which is why you oppose &lt;i&gt;Brown&lt;/i&gt;.  Right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>effectively re-writing the laws through judicial activism (and yes, that is very explicitly what is happening) is both morally wrong (because it abrogates the process), and a practical disaster.</i></p>
<p>Which is why you oppose <i>Brown</i>.  Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39492</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Equal rights all the way around; civilly-wed (Marry) for GLBT&#039;s and the equal process of divorce as the law permits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Equal rights all the way around; civilly-wed (Marry) for GLBT&#8217;s and the equal process of divorce as the law permits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trumpetbob15</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39483</link>
		<dc:creator>trumpetbob15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/10/saw-this-one-coming/#comment-39483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I must have misunderstood.  One of the women has to move to Massachusetts to get a divorce?  Shouldn&#039;t they have had to move to get married though?  Or, were they just able to cross the border, get married, and then come back to Rhode Island?  Is Massachusetts acting like Las Vegas, come on over and get a quickie marriage or something?  If so, then why should there be a time limit before getting a divorce?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I must have misunderstood.  One of the women has to move to Massachusetts to get a divorce?  Shouldn&#8217;t they have had to move to get married though?  Or, were they just able to cross the border, get married, and then come back to Rhode Island?  Is Massachusetts acting like Las Vegas, come on over and get a quickie marriage or something?  If so, then why should there be a time limit before getting a divorce?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
