Comments on: The Myth Of Huckabee The Uniter http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/21/the-myth-of-huckabee-the-uniter/ Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time. Fri, 17 May 2013 18:49:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Greg http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/21/the-myth-of-huckabee-the-uniter/#comment-41059 Greg Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:34:59 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/21/the-myth-of-huckabee-the-uniter/#comment-41059 Huckabee may be acceptable, but that doesn’t make him a good choice. He’s as prone to regulation and coercion as Guliani, just on different things.

Thompson, Tancredo and Paul atleast understand what federalism means.

]]> By: Cameron Novak http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/21/the-myth-of-huckabee-the-uniter/#comment-41005 Cameron Novak Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:45:17 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/21/the-myth-of-huckabee-the-uniter/#comment-41005 Anyone who doesn’t like Mike Huckabee and says things such as Daniel Larison, wouldn’t ever vote Republican anyway.

In rebuttal to his half-cooked remark above… David Brooks said Mike Huckabee is ACCEPTABLE. He didn’t say that everyone agrees 100% with what he believes. Larison’s response appears to assume that Brooks meant that everyone has the SAME VIEWS as Mike Huckabee, which is ridiculous… just as ridiculous as believing Larison would ever vote for a True Conservative candidate.

]]>