<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul Hits 7% In Two New New Hampshire Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike from NH</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-44055</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike from NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-44055</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a social conservative who&#039;s lived in Europe (Spain, nice place, but 80% of the youth are atheist/agnostic and a great deal of the older ones too) and I&#039;m afraid of the creeping atheism that&#039;s now happening in America. The US has been a country with no backlash against religion, because there was no state religion.

The best thing we can do to preserve religion in America is following the constitutional blueprint our founding fathers have left us.

For me, Ron Paul is the guy who&#039;ll keep God in America through free-will, the way the Lord intended it. By forcing people to be religious the opposite will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a social conservative who&#8217;s lived in Europe (Spain, nice place, but 80% of the youth are atheist/agnostic and a great deal of the older ones too) and I&#8217;m afraid of the creeping atheism that&#8217;s now happening in America. The US has been a country with no backlash against religion, because there was no state religion.</p>
<p>The best thing we can do to preserve religion in America is following the constitutional blueprint our founding fathers have left us.</p>
<p>For me, Ron Paul is the guy who&#8217;ll keep God in America through free-will, the way the Lord intended it. By forcing people to be religious the opposite will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davepaul</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-44033</link>
		<dc:creator>davepaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-44033</guid>
		<description>The evangelicals may scatter for the moment... but after Ron Paul momentum builds steam, they will start to recognize him as the heir to Ronald Reagan and rally.  

 A Ronald Reagan candidacy was viewed by the mainstream press as radical and without a chance of sucess.
After Reagan won his first primary.  He greeted the throng of cameras with his famous grin and said, &quot;You can call me anything you like, as long as it begins with FRONTRUNNER.

Ron Paul was an early supporter of RR long before it was popular to do so.   Like RR, he  just might surprise the naysayers.

Right now he is right were he wants to be... frontrunner on the straw pols, internet pols, campaign contributions. Vast grassroots support building momentum.  He is alone and on the correct side of the war, taxes, the constitution and government control of our lives. All of the other candidates are either unremarkable or remarkably similar thus all sharing the same unremarkable support base.

  Based upon internet pols, straw pols and grass roots non- corporate campaign contributions he is the frontrunner, yet he gets to run as the underdog based upon the mainstream medias attempt to marginalize him.  They have set the bar so low for him, he can ONLY surpass expectations and build momentum as he goes.

May God Bless Ron Paul with wisdom, health and the vision to return this country to the rule of law and the Constitutional republic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evangelicals may scatter for the moment&#8230; but after Ron Paul momentum builds steam, they will start to recognize him as the heir to Ronald Reagan and rally.  </p>
<p> A Ronald Reagan candidacy was viewed by the mainstream press as radical and without a chance of sucess.<br />
After Reagan won his first primary.  He greeted the throng of cameras with his famous grin and said, &#8220;You can call me anything you like, as long as it begins with FRONTRUNNER.</p>
<p>Ron Paul was an early supporter of RR long before it was popular to do so.   Like RR, he  just might surprise the naysayers.</p>
<p>Right now he is right were he wants to be&#8230; frontrunner on the straw pols, internet pols, campaign contributions. Vast grassroots support building momentum.  He is alone and on the correct side of the war, taxes, the constitution and government control of our lives. All of the other candidates are either unremarkable or remarkably similar thus all sharing the same unremarkable support base.</p>
<p>  Based upon internet pols, straw pols and grass roots non- corporate campaign contributions he is the frontrunner, yet he gets to run as the underdog based upon the mainstream medias attempt to marginalize him.  They have set the bar so low for him, he can ONLY surpass expectations and build momentum as he goes.</p>
<p>May God Bless Ron Paul with wisdom, health and the vision to return this country to the rule of law and the Constitutional republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43958</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43958</guid>
		<description>So Rudy was criminally negligent in ordering Motorola radios? That&#039;s like the proverbial &quot;you&#039;ll never get fired ordering IBM&quot;.  And Rudy himself ordered the radio? No oversight or input from any of the chiefs?

The video you link is pure pap. Eric Gioia is a liberal Democrat - at the very least visit his site if you&#039;re going to use him as a source. Let&#039;s try to get past the conspiracy stuff, at least here; remember &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam&#039;s_razor&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Occam&#039;s razor&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Rudy was criminally negligent in ordering Motorola radios? That&#8217;s like the proverbial &#8220;you&#8217;ll never get fired ordering IBM&#8221;.  And Rudy himself ordered the radio? No oversight or input from any of the chiefs?</p>
<p>The video you link is pure pap. Eric Gioia is a liberal Democrat &#8211; at the very least visit his site if you&#8217;re going to use him as a source. Let&#8217;s try to get past the conspiracy stuff, at least here; remember <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor" rel="nofollow">Occam&#8217;s razor</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom4America</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43912</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom4America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 06:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43912</guid>
		<description>Maybe the skeptics, that think Dr. Paul doesn&#039;t have a chance, should go and check out the Gambling sites that are the ONLY ones that put their money where their mouth is.

They have Dr. Paul as the best choice to BEAT Godzillary in the election.  I would trust them a hell of a lot more than any Biased Media and their UNFAIR polling system.

Why do you think the MSM is NOT reporting on the NEWS that Dr. Paul has WON more than 50% of ALL the Straw Polls.

If they reported that then people would definitely KNOW something is WRONG with their polls since people actually voted in Straw Polls and a lot more than what they polled.

As for Ghouliana once the public hears the truth about how his non-actions caused the deaths of hundreds of Courageous Firemen he will be lucky if people don&#039;t lynch him let alone NOT VOTE for him.

The site below has the TRUTH about Ghouliana.

http://therealrudy.org/radios?utm_source=rgemail

Ghouliana&#039;s past is starting to catch up with him.

ONLY A Doctor WILL HEAL Our Country,
Freedom4America</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the skeptics, that think Dr. Paul doesn&#8217;t have a chance, should go and check out the Gambling sites that are the ONLY ones that put their money where their mouth is.</p>
<p>They have Dr. Paul as the best choice to BEAT Godzillary in the election.  I would trust them a hell of a lot more than any Biased Media and their UNFAIR polling system.</p>
<p>Why do you think the MSM is NOT reporting on the NEWS that Dr. Paul has WON more than 50% of ALL the Straw Polls.</p>
<p>If they reported that then people would definitely KNOW something is WRONG with their polls since people actually voted in Straw Polls and a lot more than what they polled.</p>
<p>As for Ghouliana once the public hears the truth about how his non-actions caused the deaths of hundreds of Courageous Firemen he will be lucky if people don&#8217;t lynch him let alone NOT VOTE for him.</p>
<p>The site below has the TRUTH about Ghouliana.</p>
<p><a href="http://therealrudy.org/radios?utm_source=rgemail" rel="nofollow">http://therealrudy.org/radios?utm_source=rgemail</a></p>
<p>Ghouliana&#8217;s past is starting to catch up with him.</p>
<p>ONLY A Doctor WILL HEAL Our Country,<br />
Freedom4America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anzman</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43909</link>
		<dc:creator>anzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 05:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43909</guid>
		<description>Most polls have a +/- 5% confidence. So RP&#039;s numbers COULD be way higher and everyone else&#039;s COULD be lower. Plus aren&#039;t 60% of NH voters still saying they are undecided? GO RON PAUL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most polls have a +/- 5% confidence. So RP&#8217;s numbers COULD be way higher and everyone else&#8217;s COULD be lower. Plus aren&#8217;t 60% of NH voters still saying they are undecided? GO RON PAUL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tannim</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43897</link>
		<dc:creator>Tannim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 01:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43897</guid>
		<description>Look all, the POTS are good to get him into the rigged Iowa Fake Noise debate.  Otherwise, fuggedabodit!

Lay off Doug, too.  He could simply shut down the site with a slam post if he wanted.  He may be skeptical quite a bit, but he&#039;s fair.

Last, remember there is a wildcard in play now, which is the nationwide lawsuit in play to force all the states to go to paper ballots or suspend their primaries until they do.  We the People Foundaton finished serving the legal papers today.  The impact of that is still very much unknown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look all, the POTS are good to get him into the rigged Iowa Fake Noise debate.  Otherwise, fuggedabodit!</p>
<p>Lay off Doug, too.  He could simply shut down the site with a slam post if he wanted.  He may be skeptical quite a bit, but he&#8217;s fair.</p>
<p>Last, remember there is a wildcard in play now, which is the nationwide lawsuit in play to force all the states to go to paper ballots or suspend their primaries until they do.  We the People Foundaton finished serving the legal papers today.  The impact of that is still very much unknown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mataconis</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43886</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43886</guid>
		<description>Buckwheat, 

I&#039;d ask you to prove anything you&#039;ve said about me, but I know you can&#039;t and you know you can&#039;t

So, basicially, I&#039;m just ignoring you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buckwheat, </p>
<p>I&#8217;d ask you to prove anything you&#8217;ve said about me, but I know you can&#8217;t and you know you can&#8217;t</p>
<p>So, basicially, I&#8217;m just ignoring you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PC</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43874</link>
		<dc:creator>PC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43874</guid>
		<description>People are misjudging evangelicals.  They are nowhere as homogeneous as the media portrays them.  There are varying religious beliefs and various political involvement and evangelicals also have the same complications that all political groups have with incoherence of political logic by certain percentages their groups.  

But one important thing is being pro life.  Not all care about the holy war some evangelicals are going nuts over because they live in the country and if New York goes to hell it really don&#039;t effect them and they will never vote for a New York City Mayor that is pro choice anyway.  Are you kidding me?  People are underestimating anti city and anti abortion sentiment in the rural areas.  People might try to act all pious about it but its been prominent in the Republican Party for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are misjudging evangelicals.  They are nowhere as homogeneous as the media portrays them.  There are varying religious beliefs and various political involvement and evangelicals also have the same complications that all political groups have with incoherence of political logic by certain percentages their groups.  </p>
<p>But one important thing is being pro life.  Not all care about the holy war some evangelicals are going nuts over because they live in the country and if New York goes to hell it really don&#8217;t effect them and they will never vote for a New York City Mayor that is pro choice anyway.  Are you kidding me?  People are underestimating anti city and anti abortion sentiment in the rural areas.  People might try to act all pious about it but its been prominent in the Republican Party for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buckwheat</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43873</link>
		<dc:creator>Buckwheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43873</guid>
		<description>&quot;Realistically, the shortened primary schedule means that even a better-than-expected finish in New Hampshire might not translate into enough support to make a difference in the end, but it could be more than enough to send a message to a Republican leadership that seems to think that ideology is an afterthought, and that victory is an end in itself.&quot;

Classic Mataconis, the neocon shill pretending to be a libertarian blogger.

Ron Paul&#039;s going to win.  And when he does, we get to find out what corrupt neocon payroll Mataconis is secretly on.  I&#039;m not kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Realistically, the shortened primary schedule means that even a better-than-expected finish in New Hampshire might not translate into enough support to make a difference in the end, but it could be more than enough to send a message to a Republican leadership that seems to think that ideology is an afterthought, and that victory is an end in itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>Classic Mataconis, the neocon shill pretending to be a libertarian blogger.</p>
<p>Ron Paul&#8217;s going to win.  And when he does, we get to find out what corrupt neocon payroll Mataconis is secretly on.  I&#8217;m not kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43869</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43869</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another socially conservative, evangelical, religious right whatever that&#039;s supporting Ron Paul.  Don&#039;t understand why someone would think it unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another socially conservative, evangelical, religious right whatever that&#8217;s supporting Ron Paul.  Don&#8217;t understand why someone would think it unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkD</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43863</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43863</guid>
		<description>Oh one more thing.. People who believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories are not &quot;truthers&quot; they are &quot;retards&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh one more thing.. People who believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories are not &#8220;truthers&#8221; they are &#8220;retards&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkD</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43860</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43860</guid>
		<description>The success that Ron Paul is enjoying is remarkable in spite of the medias indifference and downright hostility towards him. Yesterday&#039;s interview on Face the Nation was the first time i ever seen Bob Schieffer treat a guest with such disrespect. I saw Tucker Carlson call Ron Paul a joke on Real Time and George Stephanopoulos bet Ron Paul that his presidential run would fail.

Way to go Dr. Paul. Made Bob Schieffer look like a doddering old fool yesterday. 

I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The success that Ron Paul is enjoying is remarkable in spite of the medias indifference and downright hostility towards him. Yesterday&#8217;s interview on Face the Nation was the first time i ever seen Bob Schieffer treat a guest with such disrespect. I saw Tucker Carlson call Ron Paul a joke on Real Time and George Stephanopoulos bet Ron Paul that his presidential run would fail.</p>
<p>Way to go Dr. Paul. Made Bob Schieffer look like a doddering old fool yesterday. </p>
<p>I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul W</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43859</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43859</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul will do well in the primaries simply because his support base is extremely motivated.  We eat up every bit of information we can find on him - why else would we be posting comments to this 5-line story?  

With that being said, every Ron Paul supporter that CAN vote in their respective primaries will more than likely vote.  I doubt you can say the same about the supporters of the other candidates.  They may support their candidate, but I doubt the same percentage of their supporters will make it out to vote in the primaries.  

Don&#039;t agree?  Ask yourself - How many times a day do you google Ron Paul?  How many times a day do you think Rudy&#039;s supporters google him?  Mitt&#039;s?  

We will be out in force to vote - an no doubt first in line.  :-)

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul will do well in the primaries simply because his support base is extremely motivated.  We eat up every bit of information we can find on him &#8211; why else would we be posting comments to this 5-line story?  </p>
<p>With that being said, every Ron Paul supporter that CAN vote in their respective primaries will more than likely vote.  I doubt you can say the same about the supporters of the other candidates.  They may support their candidate, but I doubt the same percentage of their supporters will make it out to vote in the primaries.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t agree?  Ask yourself &#8211; How many times a day do you google Ron Paul?  How many times a day do you think Rudy&#8217;s supporters google him?  Mitt&#8217;s?  </p>
<p>We will be out in force to vote &#8211; an no doubt first in line.  :-)</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aziz</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43858</link>
		<dc:creator>Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43858</guid>
		<description>I think the time is right for Ron Paul to seize the moment. He should air more commercials in New Hampshire. Also hand written campaigns are starting to take place around meet up groups as a grass root effort. We shall see more of that soon at our doorsteps.  I believe he is our Next Prophet. Our next President! Go RON PAUL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the time is right for Ron Paul to seize the moment. He should air more commercials in New Hampshire. Also hand written campaigns are starting to take place around meet up groups as a grass root effort. We shall see more of that soon at our doorsteps.  I believe he is our Next Prophet. Our next President! Go RON PAUL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43857</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/11/ron-paul-hits-7-in-two-new-new-hampshire-polls/#comment-43857</guid>
		<description>js290 wrote “Ron Paul would be assassinated if he has a legitimate shot at winning. It’ll be done either by the Federal Reserve mob or a 9/11 truther…”

What? Ron Paul wouldn&#039;t be assassinated by a 9/11 truther. Truthers love Ron Paul. If anything, yeah, they might use a Truther as the patsy to make them look like the worst of the worst. But still, it wouldn&#039;t make any sense, considering all the idiots like Hannit &amp; Gibson have already associated Truthers with liking Paul, not hating him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>js290 wrote “Ron Paul would be assassinated if he has a legitimate shot at winning. It’ll be done either by the Federal Reserve mob or a 9/11 truther…”</p>
<p>What? Ron Paul wouldn&#8217;t be assassinated by a 9/11 truther. Truthers love Ron Paul. If anything, yeah, they might use a Truther as the patsy to make them look like the worst of the worst. But still, it wouldn&#8217;t make any sense, considering all the idiots like Hannit &amp; Gibson have already associated Truthers with liking Paul, not hating him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
