<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massachusetts: Gambling Is Okay For Me, But Not For Thee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/13/massachusetts-gambling-is-okay-for-me-but-not-for-thee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/13/massachusetts-gambling-is-okay-for-me-but-not-for-thee/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akston</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/13/massachusetts-gambling-is-okay-for-me-but-not-for-thee/#comment-44010</link>
		<dc:creator>Akston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/13/massachusetts-gambling-is-okay-for-me-but-not-for-thee/#comment-44010</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Why is gambling in a casino OK and gambling on the Internet is not?” Frank said. “He’s making a big mistake. He’s giving opponents an argument against him.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Barney Frank is right, but we really didn’t need the help.  If ever there was an opportunity to use the term “&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cui_bono&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cui bono&lt;/a&gt;”, this has got to be it.  I checked the dictionary to be sure, but the definition just back-linked to this story.

Anyone want to guess whether there is a specific constituency that might be interested in Governor Patrick’s bill?

I am shocked and dismayed (that last bit was typed sarcastically) at the possibility that some businesses might be trying to gain a competitive advantage over other businesses via the laws!

When people ask why I’m so opposed to laws enforcing “moral practices”, “level playing fields”, “indecent activity”, and “unfair competition”, I gleefully point them to stories like this one.

Thanks for posting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Why is gambling in a casino OK and gambling on the Internet is not?” Frank said. “He’s making a big mistake. He’s giving opponents an argument against him.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Barney Frank is right, but we really didn’t need the help.  If ever there was an opportunity to use the term “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cui_bono" rel="nofollow">Cui bono</a>”, this has got to be it.  I checked the dictionary to be sure, but the definition just back-linked to this story.</p>
<p>Anyone want to guess whether there is a specific constituency that might be interested in Governor Patrick’s bill?</p>
<p>I am shocked and dismayed (that last bit was typed sarcastically) at the possibility that some businesses might be trying to gain a competitive advantage over other businesses via the laws!</p>
<p>When people ask why I’m so opposed to laws enforcing “moral practices”, “level playing fields”, “indecent activity”, and “unfair competition”, I gleefully point them to stories like this one.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trumpetbob15</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/13/massachusetts-gambling-is-okay-for-me-but-not-for-thee/#comment-43986</link>
		<dc:creator>trumpetbob15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/13/massachusetts-gambling-is-okay-for-me-but-not-for-thee/#comment-43986</guid>
		<description>It always made me cringe when I would hear a Michigan Dept. of Public Health gambling addicts commercial followed by a commercial for the Michigan Lotto.  Nice to see we aren&#039;t the only state that can&#039;t figure out whether gambling is good or not.  (In Michigan&#039;s case, even though you lose significantly more money to the lotto compared with casino games, at least your lost money is supporting the schools or so they always claimed.  Place a bet, lose your money, allow them to teach your kid a valuable lesson.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always made me cringe when I would hear a Michigan Dept. of Public Health gambling addicts commercial followed by a commercial for the Michigan Lotto.  Nice to see we aren&#8217;t the only state that can&#8217;t figure out whether gambling is good or not.  (In Michigan&#8217;s case, even though you lose significantly more money to the lotto compared with casino games, at least your lost money is supporting the schools or so they always claimed.  Place a bet, lose your money, allow them to teach your kid a valuable lesson.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

