Thoughts, essays, and writings on Liberty. Written by the heirs of Patrick Henry.

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.”     Ronald Reagan

November 13, 2007

Supreme Court Punts On D.C. Gun Ban Case, For Now

by Doug Mataconis

It was widely expected that the Supreme Court would announce today whether it would accept the appeal filed by the District of Columbia in the lawsuit challenging it’s handgun ban. As Lyle Denniston reports at ScotusBlog, that wasn’t the case:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday announced no action on a new case testing the meaning of the Second Amendment — an issue the Court has not considered in 68 years. The Orders List contained no mention of either the District of Columbia’s appeal (07-290) or a cross-petition by challengers to the city’s flat ban on private possession of handguns (07-335). The next date for possible action on these cases is likely to come after the Court’s pre-Thanksgiving Conference — either on the day of the Conference, Nov. 20, or the following Monday, Nov. 26.

Figuring out what might be going on with this case at the Supreme Court is a bit like reading tea leaves, but Denniston offers several possible explanations:

[A]mong the possible reasons for delaying the case are these: one or more Justices simply asked for more time to consider the two cases; the Court may be rewriting the question or questions it will be willing to review — especially in view of the disagreement between the two sides on what should be at issue; the Court may have voted initially to deny review of one or both cases and one or more Justices are writing a dissent from the denial. The appeal in 07-290 (District of Columbia v. Heller) raises the key issue about the Second Amendment’s meaning — that is, whether it guarantees an individual right to have a handgun for private use, at least in one’s home — and the appeal in 07-335 (Parker v. District of Columbia) poses a question about who may bring lawsuits to challenge laws before they are actively enforced. Together, the cases thus present a somewhat complex mix for the Court, and it perhaps was not much of a surprise that no order issued on Tuesday. At no point is there likely to be an answer as to what happened to bring about the delay. Both cases are expected to be re-listed for the Nov. 20 Conference.

There is, of course, the possibility that the Court could decide not to accept either appeal. However, given the fact that both cases present issues that haven’t been ruled on at the Supreme Court level in quite some time and the fact that there is presently a split among the Circuit Courts of Appeal on the meaning and proper interpretation of the Second Amendment, that outcome seems highly unlikely

So, stay tuned.

TrackBack URI: http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/13/supreme-court-punts-on-dc-gun-ban-case-for-now/trackback/
Read more posts from
• • •

7 Comments

  1. Corrupt Government,corrupt supreme court. = Their coming for our guns so wake up and vote for Ron Paul 2008.Let Freedom ring!

    Comment by JOHN DOE — November 13, 2007 @ 1:59 pm
  2. John,

    Umm, you do realize this post has nothing to do with Ron Paul and that there’s a very good chance the Supreme Court would strike down the D.C. Gun law right ?

    Not everything is a Masonic conspiracy.

    Comment by Doug Mataconis — November 13, 2007 @ 2:01 pm
  3. i love this coment its so true thanks mack So Rudy was criminally negligent in ordering Motorola radios? That’s like the proverbial “you’ll never get fired ordering IBM”. And Rudy himself ordered the radio? No oversight or input from any of the chiefs?

    The video you link is pure pap. Eric Gioia is a liberal Democrat – at the very least visit his site if you’re going to use him as a source. Let’s try to get past the conspiracy stuff, at least here; remember Occam’s razor.

    Comment by joel — November 13, 2007 @ 2:02 pm
  4. The following sentence has a common error. “It was widely expected that the Supreme Court would announce today whether it would accept the appeal filed by the District of Columbia in the lawsuit challenging it’s handgun ban.”
    It used it’s which is a contraction for it is instead of its which is possessive. Shouldn’t the writers for this blog know the correct usage?

    Comment by Sara — November 13, 2007 @ 4:16 pm
  5. Sara, while that is a common, and unfortunate, grammatical error, shouldn’t you have something better to do? Or a comment that adds some value to the discussion?

    Comment by Eric — November 13, 2007 @ 4:54 pm
  6. Sara,

    Ummm, okay, I’ll send a letter of apology to my 11th Grade English teacher.

    Comment by Doug Mataconis — November 13, 2007 @ 5:36 pm
  7. [...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here’s a quick excerpt It was widely expected that the Supreme Court would announce today whether it would accept the appeal filed by the District of Columbia in the lawsuit challenging it’s handgun ban. As Lyle Denniston reports at ScotusBlog, that wasn’t the case: The Supreme Court on Tuesday announced no action on a new case testing the meaning of the Second Amendment — an issue the Court has not considered in 68 years. The Orders List contained no mention of either the District of Columbia’s appeal (07-290) or a [...]

    Pingback by My Personal Blog » Supreme Court Punts On D.C. Gun Ban Case, For Now — November 13, 2007 @ 9:26 pm

Comments RSS

Subscribe without commenting

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by: WordPress • Template by: Eric • Banner #1, #3, #4 by Stephen Macklin • Banner #2 by Mark RaynerXML