Comments on: Supreme Court Punts On D.C. Gun Ban Case, For Now

By: My Personal Blog » Supreme Court Punts On D.C. Gun Ban Case, For Now

My Personal Blog » Supreme Court Punts On D.C. Gun Ban Case, For Now — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:26:29 +0000

[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here’s a quick excerpt It was widely expected that the Supreme Court would announce today whether it would accept the appeal filed by the District of Columbia in the lawsuit challenging it’s handgun ban. As Lyle Denniston reports at ScotusBlog, that wasn’t the case: The Supreme Court on Tuesday announced no action on a new case testing the meaning of the Second Amendment — an issue the Court has not considered in 68 years. The Orders List contained no mention of either the District of Columbia’s appeal (07-290) or a [...]

By: Doug Mataconis

Doug Mataconis — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:36:41 +0000

Sara,

Ummm, okay, I’ll send a letter of apology to my 11th Grade English teacher.

By: Eric

Eric — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:54:35 +0000

Sara, while that is a common, and unfortunate, grammatical error, shouldn’t you have something better to do? Or a comment that adds some value to the discussion?

By: Sara

Sara — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:16:22 +0000

The following sentence has a common error. “It was widely expected that the Supreme Court would announce today whether it would accept the appeal filed by the District of Columbia in the lawsuit challenging it’s handgun ban.”
It used it’s which is a contraction for it is instead of its which is possessive. Shouldn’t the writers for this blog know the correct usage?

By: joel

joel — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:02:41 +0000

i love this coment its so true thanks mack So Rudy was criminally negligent in ordering Motorola radios? That’s like the proverbial “you’ll never get fired ordering IBM”. And Rudy himself ordered the radio? No oversight or input from any of the chiefs?

The video you link is pure pap. Eric Gioia is a liberal Democrat – at the very least visit his site if you’re going to use him as a source. Let’s try to get past the conspiracy stuff, at least here; remember Occam’s razor.

By: Doug Mataconis

Doug Mataconis — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:01:55 +0000

John,

Umm, you do realize this post has nothing to do with Ron Paul and that there’s a very good chance the Supreme Court would strike down the D.C. Gun law right ?

Not everything is a Masonic conspiracy.

By: JOHN DOE

JOHN DOE — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:59:24 +0000

Corrupt Government,corrupt supreme court. = Their coming for our guns so wake up and vote for Ron Paul 2008.Let Freedom ring!