<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Liberty Dollar Seizure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hickson</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44702</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44702</guid>
		<description>Liberty Dollar was attempting to create a negotiable item. In order to do that they had to give it a face value.

Liberty dollars could not be a negotiable instrument it it required all retailers to keep track of the hourly value of silver or gold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberty Dollar was attempting to create a negotiable item. In order to do that they had to give it a face value.</p>
<p>Liberty dollars could not be a negotiable instrument it it required all retailers to keep track of the hourly value of silver or gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44672</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44672</guid>
		<description>Tom,

All references to the founding fathers aside, I believe you&#039;re completely missing my point.

My issue is NOT that it is sold at a premium.  I am not against profit in any way, and I understand that as businessmen offering an alternative currency, they have every right to make as much profit as the market will bear.  Since they&#039;ve created a currency that actually holds value (unlike FRN&#039;s), I think it perfectly reasonable that people would be willing to pay above the spot price in USD to hold that currency.

My issue is that all the public marketing of the currency, and the fact that they are trying to &quot;price&quot; it near but below that of the USD dollar, indicates that they are trying to pass it as an equivalent to the US dollar, not an alternative.  They could have left it stamped at $10 ALD and still sold it for $18 USD, because there should be no relationship between what the number stamped on their currency and the number printed on US FRN&#039;s.  But they didn&#039;t do that, and the marketing material they offer indicates that the reason they didn&#039;t do so may not be as wholesome as you ascribe.  

The problem, as I see it, is that they&#039;re offering a currency that&#039;s fairly valued at about $15-16 USD, and yet people are trying to buy $20 USD items with it.  I wouldn&#039;t even call that a scam (as they can&#039;t control what those buyers try to do with the currency), except that &lt;strong&gt;their own marketing&lt;/strong&gt; is clearly designed to encourage that when they suggest that it should be bought &quot;at a discount&quot; and spent &quot;at a profit&quot;.  It&#039;s clear that they want to &lt;strong&gt;create the impression&lt;/strong&gt; that $20 ALD should be used to purchase $20 USD worth of goods, a fundamentally flawed impression.

I have no problem with them making profit on the currency.  I really don&#039;t care what they stamp on it.  They could just as easily have made $1 ALD = 1 oz of silver or $100 ALD = 1 oz of silver.  Where I think the scam occurs is in constantly trying to re-price the currency near (but below) parity with the USD in order for it to be spent &quot;at a profit&quot; when purchasing goods priced in USD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>All references to the founding fathers aside, I believe you&#8217;re completely missing my point.</p>
<p>My issue is NOT that it is sold at a premium.  I am not against profit in any way, and I understand that as businessmen offering an alternative currency, they have every right to make as much profit as the market will bear.  Since they&#8217;ve created a currency that actually holds value (unlike FRN&#8217;s), I think it perfectly reasonable that people would be willing to pay above the spot price in USD to hold that currency.</p>
<p>My issue is that all the public marketing of the currency, and the fact that they are trying to &#8220;price&#8221; it near but below that of the USD dollar, indicates that they are trying to pass it as an equivalent to the US dollar, not an alternative.  They could have left it stamped at $10 ALD and still sold it for $18 USD, because there should be no relationship between what the number stamped on their currency and the number printed on US FRN&#8217;s.  But they didn&#8217;t do that, and the marketing material they offer indicates that the reason they didn&#8217;t do so may not be as wholesome as you ascribe.  </p>
<p>The problem, as I see it, is that they&#8217;re offering a currency that&#8217;s fairly valued at about $15-16 USD, and yet people are trying to buy $20 USD items with it.  I wouldn&#8217;t even call that a scam (as they can&#8217;t control what those buyers try to do with the currency), except that <strong>their own marketing</strong> is clearly designed to encourage that when they suggest that it should be bought &#8220;at a discount&#8221; and spent &#8220;at a profit&#8221;.  It&#8217;s clear that they want to <strong>create the impression</strong> that $20 ALD should be used to purchase $20 USD worth of goods, a fundamentally flawed impression.</p>
<p>I have no problem with them making profit on the currency.  I really don&#8217;t care what they stamp on it.  They could just as easily have made $1 ALD = 1 oz of silver or $100 ALD = 1 oz of silver.  Where I think the scam occurs is in constantly trying to re-price the currency near (but below) parity with the USD in order for it to be spent &#8220;at a profit&#8221; when purchasing goods priced in USD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Draschil</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44603</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Draschil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44603</guid>
		<description>To Brad Warbiany: You conclude the ALD is a scam (albeit less than the Fed scam) because it is initially sold at a premium over the value of the gold or silver content. That is done strictly for practical reasons: The issuers (including the U.S. Government)have always done so so as to not lose money when issuing it. You know, or should know, that gold and silver coin has always had a face value a little above spot value as the real value is constantly changing, even when artificially frozen by the government. Those who claim to descend from a venerable saint like Patrick Henry should be held to a higher standard. I conclude that you&#039;re just an establishment kind of guy without the courage to measure truth by correct standards, as set by We the People (it&#039;s called Rule of Law - ultimately God&#039;s law if we are wise enough to implement His correct eternal principles here on earth where he has made us sovereigns under Him by giving unalienable rights - Tho. Jefferson), rather than what the current politicians in power are trying to enforce (it&#039;s called Rule of Man). Your forefather stood for Rule of Law. You (and all of us) should learn and promulgate it if we ever hope to be in his league.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Brad Warbiany: You conclude the ALD is a scam (albeit less than the Fed scam) because it is initially sold at a premium over the value of the gold or silver content. That is done strictly for practical reasons: The issuers (including the U.S. Government)have always done so so as to not lose money when issuing it. You know, or should know, that gold and silver coin has always had a face value a little above spot value as the real value is constantly changing, even when artificially frozen by the government. Those who claim to descend from a venerable saint like Patrick Henry should be held to a higher standard. I conclude that you&#8217;re just an establishment kind of guy without the courage to measure truth by correct standards, as set by We the People (it&#8217;s called Rule of Law &#8211; ultimately God&#8217;s law if we are wise enough to implement His correct eternal principles here on earth where he has made us sovereigns under Him by giving unalienable rights &#8211; Tho. Jefferson), rather than what the current politicians in power are trying to enforce (it&#8217;s called Rule of Man). Your forefather stood for Rule of Law. You (and all of us) should learn and promulgate it if we ever hope to be in his league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44481</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44481</guid>
		<description>Don:

&lt;em&gt;&quot;The problem is that the USD continuously falls in value as the money supply is inflated.

This causes a problem for both NORFED and the government.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

It only causes a problem for NORFED if they are trying to achieve parity with the USD, i.e. if they are trying to create the [false] assumption in Liberty Associates, Merchants, and store clerks that $20 ALD can and should be spent at the same value as $20 USD.  The currencies are different, thus it is only a problem for NORFED if they choose to make it a problem.

It is, of course, a major problem for government (and any of us that use FRN&#039;s).

&lt;em&gt;&quot;NORFED tries to solve it by step adjustments in the value of the silver ounce ALD so that it alternately jumps above and then decays back towards parity, tracking the USD price of silver, over the long term.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Again, if they try to &quot;price&quot; their currency relatively close to the USD, then does it not seem to you like they&#039;re trying to have it used 1:1 for transactions denominated in USD?  But that&#039;s fundamentally fraudulent, as it is not 1:1 equivalent.  It is &lt;strong&gt;always&lt;/strong&gt; priced such that it is redeemable for less in USD than an equivalent denomination in USD.  Thus if you try to spend it as a 1:1 equivalent you&#039;re screwing the merchant, not &quot;using an alternative currency&quot;.  

An alternative currency doesn&#039;t have to track the USD.  The proper answer would be to float the currency.  After all, wouldn&#039;t it be nice for the Liberty Dollar folks to walk into a store with a $10 ALD (old base) piece and be able to tell a store clerk that 5 years ago, it was worth $6 USD, and now it&#039;s worth $15 USD, because the USD has fallen so badly?  Perhaps the holder of that piece can convince a store owner to accept a $10 ALD (old based) piece for an item that is priced at $15 USD (which is ethical) instead of trying to get a store owner to sell him a $20 USD item for $20 ALD (new base, which is closer to $15 USD).

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Yhe government tries to solve the problem by first shifting from precious metals to ever cheaper base metals, and when even that can’t keep up with unrelenting money supply inflation, it declares that it is illegal to melt down pennies to recover their copper value.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Again, there is absolutely &lt;strong&gt;NO&lt;/strong&gt; argument with you on this point.  I have my concerns with the Liberty Dollar, but what they&#039;re doing is small potatoes.  The actions of our Federal Reserve are capable (and potentially likely) of destabilizing the entire world economy when (if?) it collapses.  They&#039;ve built a house of sand, and it seems like the tide is coming in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The problem is that the USD continuously falls in value as the money supply is inflated.</p>
<p>This causes a problem for both NORFED and the government.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>It only causes a problem for NORFED if they are trying to achieve parity with the USD, i.e. if they are trying to create the [false] assumption in Liberty Associates, Merchants, and store clerks that $20 ALD can and should be spent at the same value as $20 USD.  The currencies are different, thus it is only a problem for NORFED if they choose to make it a problem.</p>
<p>It is, of course, a major problem for government (and any of us that use FRN&#8217;s).</p>
<p><em>&#8220;NORFED tries to solve it by step adjustments in the value of the silver ounce ALD so that it alternately jumps above and then decays back towards parity, tracking the USD price of silver, over the long term.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Again, if they try to &#8220;price&#8221; their currency relatively close to the USD, then does it not seem to you like they&#8217;re trying to have it used 1:1 for transactions denominated in USD?  But that&#8217;s fundamentally fraudulent, as it is not 1:1 equivalent.  It is <strong>always</strong> priced such that it is redeemable for less in USD than an equivalent denomination in USD.  Thus if you try to spend it as a 1:1 equivalent you&#8217;re screwing the merchant, not &#8220;using an alternative currency&#8221;.  </p>
<p>An alternative currency doesn&#8217;t have to track the USD.  The proper answer would be to float the currency.  After all, wouldn&#8217;t it be nice for the Liberty Dollar folks to walk into a store with a $10 ALD (old base) piece and be able to tell a store clerk that 5 years ago, it was worth $6 USD, and now it&#8217;s worth $15 USD, because the USD has fallen so badly?  Perhaps the holder of that piece can convince a store owner to accept a $10 ALD (old based) piece for an item that is priced at $15 USD (which is ethical) instead of trying to get a store owner to sell him a $20 USD item for $20 ALD (new base, which is closer to $15 USD).</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Yhe government tries to solve the problem by first shifting from precious metals to ever cheaper base metals, and when even that can’t keep up with unrelenting money supply inflation, it declares that it is illegal to melt down pennies to recover their copper value.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Again, there is absolutely <strong>NO</strong> argument with you on this point.  I have my concerns with the Liberty Dollar, but what they&#8217;re doing is small potatoes.  The actions of our Federal Reserve are capable (and potentially likely) of destabilizing the entire world economy when (if?) it collapses.  They&#8217;ve built a house of sand, and it seems like the tide is coming in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44480</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44480</guid>
		<description>Christopher: &lt;em&gt;&quot;Correct me if I’m wrong, but when the LD folks changed the base value from $10 to $20 you could turn your $10 pieces in and have them exchanged for $20? Wouldn’t that mean that you made $10 just for holding on to the Liberties? That’s not a scam, that’s ten bucks in profit just for holding on to your Liberty Dollar until the spot price rose to a certain level.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Well, actually your currency increased from about $7 USD to about $15 USD over the last several years, regardless of what&#039;s stamped on the round.  Your holdings increased in value [relative to the USD] because silver grew in value [relative to the USD], &lt;strong&gt;NOT&lt;/strong&gt; because they re-stamped it at $20 instead of $10.  Plus, you &quot;made&quot; $8 USD, not $10 USD, but if you sucker some store clerk into accepting that $20 ALD as if it were $20 USD, then you can say you &quot;made&quot; $10, but I wouldn&#039;t call it ethical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher: <em>&#8220;Correct me if I’m wrong, but when the LD folks changed the base value from $10 to $20 you could turn your $10 pieces in and have them exchanged for $20? Wouldn’t that mean that you made $10 just for holding on to the Liberties? That’s not a scam, that’s ten bucks in profit just for holding on to your Liberty Dollar until the spot price rose to a certain level.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Well, actually your currency increased from about $7 USD to about $15 USD over the last several years, regardless of what&#8217;s stamped on the round.  Your holdings increased in value [relative to the USD] because silver grew in value [relative to the USD], <strong>NOT</strong> because they re-stamped it at $20 instead of $10.  Plus, you &#8220;made&#8221; $8 USD, not $10 USD, but if you sucker some store clerk into accepting that $20 ALD as if it were $20 USD, then you can say you &#8220;made&#8221; $10, but I wouldn&#8217;t call it ethical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick C. Hodgin</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44470</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick C. Hodgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44470</guid>
		<description>It absolutely amazes me the amount of ignorance there is in our society about such matters.

Money in this country used to be a measurement of weight.  The dollar represented a certain number of grains of gold or silver, and it was a definable quantity.  When something was stamped $20, that meant it had 20 times the specified number of grains of gold or silver in it.

There is a rule of law, and there is a basis of inherent rights in the United States of America.  We have certain abilities as citizens in this land, but only if we stand up and hold on to those rights.  The moment we sit down and say &quot;okay&quot; when they step forward and take away that which we are endowed with by our creator, then that is the moment we voluntarily hand over power and authority to something which otherwise would not have had it.

There have been three attempts in this country to introduce a central bank.  The first two occurred in the early 1800s and were shut down quickly.  Andrew Jackson wrote that the second bank of the the United States was &quot;a brood of vipers, and I intend to route you out!&quot;  It&#039;s actually a significant matter of historical irony that he appears on our most common denomination today in the Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs).

We do not have money in this nation.  Find an old Black&#039;s Law dictionary from before the 1920s.  You&#039;ll find a definition for the dollar as a specific weight of gold or silver.  Find one after that time, and it&#039;s a circular relationship tied to cents.  A dollar is 100 cents.  A cent is 1/100th of a dollar.  There is no longer a finite, tangible correlation to anything.

The Federal Reserve Banking Sysem is not federal, it&#039;s a group of private bankers.  And they are stealing everything from this nation through their illegal system of credit.  The only reason we think we have to abide by their criminal system is because they have set everything in our society up to make it seem that way.  And, if it&#039;s been that way forever... it must be right.

Look at the value of the &quot;U.S. dollar&quot; since 1913, when the Glass-Owen Act was passed which created the Federal Reserve.  It has decreased 25x!!!  What used to cost 4 cents, now costs one dollar.  That decline is unprecedented in our nation&#039;s history because the dollar used to be a measurement of weight referring to gold or silver.  And that value didn&#039;t change significantly over time.

From 1635 until 1913, the &quot;U.S. Dollar&quot; was fairly consistent, at around 25 times what it is worth today.  That&#039;s 275 years it maintained its value.  Since I&#039;ve been alive, 1960s, the value of the dollar has decreased 5 times.  What used to cost 20 cents, now cost a dollar.

We (the U.S. citizens) are being taken advantage of by a criminal group of gangsters who seem legitimate because they are tied to the government.  We need to self-educate, learn the difference between rights and privileges, and then stand upon the rule of law and take back our nation.

Patriots like Ron Paul who recognize the difference, who are educated, and who believe in controlling government, are the only candidates that should ever be considered.  They are the one who will keep this nation &quot;the land of the free, the home of the brave.&quot;  It is not that way today under either Democrat or Republican rule.  They are both playing for the same side.  If you could envision it this way, there&#039;s one puppet master, the Federal Reserve Banking System, and its global partners, and there are two puppets on each hand.  But, they&#039;re controlled by the same entity.

Education is key.  Educate yourself about righs.  About the fundamental principles of the rule of law.  And then stand up for yourself, and your neighbor in so doing.

Read what George Washington wrote about government.  Google &quot;George Washington government force&quot;.

God bless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It absolutely amazes me the amount of ignorance there is in our society about such matters.</p>
<p>Money in this country used to be a measurement of weight.  The dollar represented a certain number of grains of gold or silver, and it was a definable quantity.  When something was stamped $20, that meant it had 20 times the specified number of grains of gold or silver in it.</p>
<p>There is a rule of law, and there is a basis of inherent rights in the United States of America.  We have certain abilities as citizens in this land, but only if we stand up and hold on to those rights.  The moment we sit down and say &#8220;okay&#8221; when they step forward and take away that which we are endowed with by our creator, then that is the moment we voluntarily hand over power and authority to something which otherwise would not have had it.</p>
<p>There have been three attempts in this country to introduce a central bank.  The first two occurred in the early 1800s and were shut down quickly.  Andrew Jackson wrote that the second bank of the the United States was &#8220;a brood of vipers, and I intend to route you out!&#8221;  It&#8217;s actually a significant matter of historical irony that he appears on our most common denomination today in the Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs).</p>
<p>We do not have money in this nation.  Find an old Black&#8217;s Law dictionary from before the 1920s.  You&#8217;ll find a definition for the dollar as a specific weight of gold or silver.  Find one after that time, and it&#8217;s a circular relationship tied to cents.  A dollar is 100 cents.  A cent is 1/100th of a dollar.  There is no longer a finite, tangible correlation to anything.</p>
<p>The Federal Reserve Banking Sysem is not federal, it&#8217;s a group of private bankers.  And they are stealing everything from this nation through their illegal system of credit.  The only reason we think we have to abide by their criminal system is because they have set everything in our society up to make it seem that way.  And, if it&#8217;s been that way forever&#8230; it must be right.</p>
<p>Look at the value of the &#8220;U.S. dollar&#8221; since 1913, when the Glass-Owen Act was passed which created the Federal Reserve.  It has decreased 25x!!!  What used to cost 4 cents, now costs one dollar.  That decline is unprecedented in our nation&#8217;s history because the dollar used to be a measurement of weight referring to gold or silver.  And that value didn&#8217;t change significantly over time.</p>
<p>From 1635 until 1913, the &#8220;U.S. Dollar&#8221; was fairly consistent, at around 25 times what it is worth today.  That&#8217;s 275 years it maintained its value.  Since I&#8217;ve been alive, 1960s, the value of the dollar has decreased 5 times.  What used to cost 20 cents, now cost a dollar.</p>
<p>We (the U.S. citizens) are being taken advantage of by a criminal group of gangsters who seem legitimate because they are tied to the government.  We need to self-educate, learn the difference between rights and privileges, and then stand upon the rule of law and take back our nation.</p>
<p>Patriots like Ron Paul who recognize the difference, who are educated, and who believe in controlling government, are the only candidates that should ever be considered.  They are the one who will keep this nation &#8220;the land of the free, the home of the brave.&#8221;  It is not that way today under either Democrat or Republican rule.  They are both playing for the same side.  If you could envision it this way, there&#8217;s one puppet master, the Federal Reserve Banking System, and its global partners, and there are two puppets on each hand.  But, they&#8217;re controlled by the same entity.</p>
<p>Education is key.  Educate yourself about righs.  About the fundamental principles of the rule of law.  And then stand up for yourself, and your neighbor in so doing.</p>
<p>Read what George Washington wrote about government.  Google &#8220;George Washington government force&#8221;.</p>
<p>God bless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Burch</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44457</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Burch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44457</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but when the LD folks changed the base value from $10 to $20 you could turn your $10 pieces in and have them exchanged for $20?  Wouldn&#039;t that mean that you made $10 just for holding on to the Liberties?  That&#039;s not a scam, that&#039;s ten bucks in profit just for holding on to your Liberty Dollar until the spot price rose to a certain level.

The Fed could do the same, only they&#039;d have to take your $20 bill and give you back a $10 bill to accurately reflect it&#039;s loss in purchasing power.  With the silver round the LD folks are re-stamping it to reflect it&#039;s increase in value.  The holder of the Liberty Dollar is the winner here.  Having it re-stamped is visual confirmation of this.  I am not sure if they charge a substantial fee for the re-stamping or what the postage cost is, but I think it is marvelous that I could have a currency that doubled in value each time the prices of silver, gold, or copper hit a certain price benchmark.

What kind of a &quot;scam&quot; is this where your money doubles in value every few years?  I want to be &quot;suckered&quot; by that kind of scam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but when the LD folks changed the base value from $10 to $20 you could turn your $10 pieces in and have them exchanged for $20?  Wouldn&#8217;t that mean that you made $10 just for holding on to the Liberties?  That&#8217;s not a scam, that&#8217;s ten bucks in profit just for holding on to your Liberty Dollar until the spot price rose to a certain level.</p>
<p>The Fed could do the same, only they&#8217;d have to take your $20 bill and give you back a $10 bill to accurately reflect it&#8217;s loss in purchasing power.  With the silver round the LD folks are re-stamping it to reflect it&#8217;s increase in value.  The holder of the Liberty Dollar is the winner here.  Having it re-stamped is visual confirmation of this.  I am not sure if they charge a substantial fee for the re-stamping or what the postage cost is, but I think it is marvelous that I could have a currency that doubled in value each time the prices of silver, gold, or copper hit a certain price benchmark.</p>
<p>What kind of a &#8220;scam&#8221; is this where your money doubles in value every few years?  I want to be &#8220;suckered&#8221; by that kind of scam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Samuels</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44456</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Samuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44456</guid>
		<description>Respectfully I must comment, that in review of this situation, this case is quite significant. I am very familiar with commerce law and legal tender case law and the government is skating on very thin ice in this matter. It would not  surprise me if the Liberty Dollar folks win this matter in court, and rather quickly. If the silver and gold rounds are not an exact copy of US Treasury products, than there is no counterfeit subject matter in the case. And indeed the US Mint has admitted this. And as far as spending them, one is not obliged to accept legal tender any more than one is required to accept a credit card. The term &quot;current money&quot; actually means &quot;legal tender&quot;, and all legal tender means is it is acceptable for payment of government taxes. The Liberty Organization appears to have always been quite clear that their product is not legal tender any more than Disney Dollars are, as old brochures and website disclaimers dating back to 1998 declare this. The comments about it MLM are a smoke screen, and it is obviously not MLM as there is only one level, a referral fee to another associate. Additionally no one was forced to accept them, how could they be? It is voluntary to accept the green money, so how could one be forced to accept anything they do not explicity choose to accept. If a vendor did not like it, they would give it back and ask for something else. There are close to 90 different circulating currencies in the US and we have our own in my town as well, this is just one that was precious metal based and albeit, the only one I would have been inclined to accept too. And that is what the US Gov is mandated to produce, but is not. So it is a thorn in the government&#039;s side as it not following its own mandate, but the private sector fulfilled the mandate and obviously the peoples will judged by the 20 million in circulation. I have 3 myself. The dollar peg and other comments about it are all a smokescreen being put forth by the government and you are buying into it. Its a sad comment that you would not accept something that has real intrinsic value over a promise. It appears the government is taking advantage of peoples ignorance of these legal terms such as &quot;current money&quot; and &quot;legal tender&quot; and yourself included has the same misunderstandings. I wish Liberty Dollar luck in their suit and I would be honored to be on their legal team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respectfully I must comment, that in review of this situation, this case is quite significant. I am very familiar with commerce law and legal tender case law and the government is skating on very thin ice in this matter. It would not  surprise me if the Liberty Dollar folks win this matter in court, and rather quickly. If the silver and gold rounds are not an exact copy of US Treasury products, than there is no counterfeit subject matter in the case. And indeed the US Mint has admitted this. And as far as spending them, one is not obliged to accept legal tender any more than one is required to accept a credit card. The term &#8220;current money&#8221; actually means &#8220;legal tender&#8221;, and all legal tender means is it is acceptable for payment of government taxes. The Liberty Organization appears to have always been quite clear that their product is not legal tender any more than Disney Dollars are, as old brochures and website disclaimers dating back to 1998 declare this. The comments about it MLM are a smoke screen, and it is obviously not MLM as there is only one level, a referral fee to another associate. Additionally no one was forced to accept them, how could they be? It is voluntary to accept the green money, so how could one be forced to accept anything they do not explicity choose to accept. If a vendor did not like it, they would give it back and ask for something else. There are close to 90 different circulating currencies in the US and we have our own in my town as well, this is just one that was precious metal based and albeit, the only one I would have been inclined to accept too. And that is what the US Gov is mandated to produce, but is not. So it is a thorn in the government&#8217;s side as it not following its own mandate, but the private sector fulfilled the mandate and obviously the peoples will judged by the 20 million in circulation. I have 3 myself. The dollar peg and other comments about it are all a smokescreen being put forth by the government and you are buying into it. Its a sad comment that you would not accept something that has real intrinsic value over a promise. It appears the government is taking advantage of peoples ignorance of these legal terms such as &#8220;current money&#8221; and &#8220;legal tender&#8221; and yourself included has the same misunderstandings. I wish Liberty Dollar luck in their suit and I would be honored to be on their legal team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recordman</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44455</link>
		<dc:creator>recordman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44455</guid>
		<description>ONE DAY WONDER, HERE!(EDITED &amp; REVISED)

Why should it be incumbent upon the consumer &amp; small business owner to constantly
re-calculate the amount of silver they want to trade for a consumer good or service,
when a perfectly good index exists: prices denominated in Federal Reserve Notes.

The companies/industries involved have made an in depth study of their selling prices, even
going as far as hedging input costs &amp; foreign currency exposure.

In a regime of silver money the consumer &amp; businessman could make adjustments
in the amount of silver traded for a good or service since there would be more information
on the relationship of silver to goods/services(comparable to FRN price information now).

At this date constant inflation makes on going re-calculations of prices denominated in ounces of silver impractical.

Interst in the ALD comes from the FRNs failure as a store of value and not as a medium of exchange.

Denominating the ALD in FRNs is essentially is it&#039;s own &quot;Suggested Retail Price&quot; to trade for consumer goods
&amp; services denominated in FRNs.

The value added components of the ALD over silver bullion.


(1.)SUGGESTED CURRENT 1:1 RELATIONSHIP TO FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

(2.)LIMITED ACCEPTANCE AS A CURRENT &amp; FUTURE MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE(UNTIL THE BUST?), COUPLED WITH POTENTIAL AS A STORE OF 
VALUE/HEDGE AGAINST FRNs.

(3.)NOVELTY VALUE: TRANSACTING IN ALDs CAN BE VIEWED AS A POLITICAL STATEMENT/VOTE AGAINST FRNs.



On the wholesale level(original ALD purchaser): if the attributes and potential for use of the ALD is viewed to be worth
less  than its cost in FRNs, limited transactions will occur.


On the retail level: if the retail price realizable in ALDs is viewed to have less utility than the retail price in FRNs,
Gresham&#039;s Law suggests limited transactions will take place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ONE DAY WONDER, HERE!(EDITED &amp; REVISED)</p>
<p>Why should it be incumbent upon the consumer &amp; small business owner to constantly<br />
re-calculate the amount of silver they want to trade for a consumer good or service,<br />
when a perfectly good index exists: prices denominated in Federal Reserve Notes.</p>
<p>The companies/industries involved have made an in depth study of their selling prices, even<br />
going as far as hedging input costs &amp; foreign currency exposure.</p>
<p>In a regime of silver money the consumer &amp; businessman could make adjustments<br />
in the amount of silver traded for a good or service since there would be more information<br />
on the relationship of silver to goods/services(comparable to FRN price information now).</p>
<p>At this date constant inflation makes on going re-calculations of prices denominated in ounces of silver impractical.</p>
<p>Interst in the ALD comes from the FRNs failure as a store of value and not as a medium of exchange.</p>
<p>Denominating the ALD in FRNs is essentially is it&#8217;s own &#8220;Suggested Retail Price&#8221; to trade for consumer goods<br />
&amp; services denominated in FRNs.</p>
<p>The value added components of the ALD over silver bullion.</p>
<p>(1.)SUGGESTED CURRENT 1:1 RELATIONSHIP TO FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.</p>
<p>(2.)LIMITED ACCEPTANCE AS A CURRENT &amp; FUTURE MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE(UNTIL THE BUST?), COUPLED WITH POTENTIAL AS A STORE OF<br />
VALUE/HEDGE AGAINST FRNs.</p>
<p>(3.)NOVELTY VALUE: TRANSACTING IN ALDs CAN BE VIEWED AS A POLITICAL STATEMENT/VOTE AGAINST FRNs.</p>
<p>On the wholesale level(original ALD purchaser): if the attributes and potential for use of the ALD is viewed to be worth<br />
less  than its cost in FRNs, limited transactions will occur.</p>
<p>On the retail level: if the retail price realizable in ALDs is viewed to have less utility than the retail price in FRNs,<br />
Gresham&#8217;s Law suggests limited transactions will take place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recordman</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44454</link>
		<dc:creator>recordman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44454</guid>
		<description>ONE DAY WONDER, HERE!

Why should it be incumbant upon the consumer &amp; small business owner to constantly
re-calculate the amount of silver they want to trade for a consumer good or servive,
when a perfectly good index exists: prices denominated in Federal Reserve Notes.

The companies/industries involved have made an in depth study of their selling prices, even
going as far as hedging input costs &amp; foreign currency exposure.

In a regime of silver money the consumer &amp; businessman could make adjustments
in the amount of silver traded for a good or service since there would be more information
on the relationship of silver to goods/services(comparable to FRN price information now).

At this date constant inflation makes on going re-calculations of prices denominated in ounces of silver impractical.

Interst in the ALD comes from the FRNs failure as a store of value and not as a medium of exchange.

Denominating the ALD in FRNs is essentially is it&#039;s own &quot;Suggested Retail Price&quot; to trade for consumer goods
&amp; services denominated in FRNs.

The value added components of the ALD over silver bullion.


(1.)SUGGESTED CURRENT 1:1 RELATIONSHIP TO FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

(2.)ALD HAS POTENTIAL AS A STORE OF VALUE/HEDGE AGAINST FRNs.

(3.)NOVELTY VALUE: TRANSACTING IN ALDs CAN BE VIEWED AS A POLITICAL STATEMENT/VOTE AGAINST FRNs.



On the wholesale level(original ALD purchaser): if the attributes and potential for use of the ALD is viewed to be worth less
 than its cost in FRNs, limited transactions will occur.


On the retail level: if the retail price realizable in ALDs is viewed to have less utility than the retail price in FRNs,
Gresham&#039;s Law suggests limited transactions will take place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ONE DAY WONDER, HERE!</p>
<p>Why should it be incumbant upon the consumer &amp; small business owner to constantly<br />
re-calculate the amount of silver they want to trade for a consumer good or servive,<br />
when a perfectly good index exists: prices denominated in Federal Reserve Notes.</p>
<p>The companies/industries involved have made an in depth study of their selling prices, even<br />
going as far as hedging input costs &amp; foreign currency exposure.</p>
<p>In a regime of silver money the consumer &amp; businessman could make adjustments<br />
in the amount of silver traded for a good or service since there would be more information<br />
on the relationship of silver to goods/services(comparable to FRN price information now).</p>
<p>At this date constant inflation makes on going re-calculations of prices denominated in ounces of silver impractical.</p>
<p>Interst in the ALD comes from the FRNs failure as a store of value and not as a medium of exchange.</p>
<p>Denominating the ALD in FRNs is essentially is it&#8217;s own &#8220;Suggested Retail Price&#8221; to trade for consumer goods<br />
&amp; services denominated in FRNs.</p>
<p>The value added components of the ALD over silver bullion.</p>
<p>(1.)SUGGESTED CURRENT 1:1 RELATIONSHIP TO FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.</p>
<p>(2.)ALD HAS POTENTIAL AS A STORE OF VALUE/HEDGE AGAINST FRNs.</p>
<p>(3.)NOVELTY VALUE: TRANSACTING IN ALDs CAN BE VIEWED AS A POLITICAL STATEMENT/VOTE AGAINST FRNs.</p>
<p>On the wholesale level(original ALD purchaser): if the attributes and potential for use of the ALD is viewed to be worth less<br />
 than its cost in FRNs, limited transactions will occur.</p>
<p>On the retail level: if the retail price realizable in ALDs is viewed to have less utility than the retail price in FRNs,<br />
Gresham&#8217;s Law suggests limited transactions will take place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44442</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44442</guid>
		<description>Brad,

&quot;It would, if they kept the same base rate, mean that $1 ALD is MORE valuable than $1 USD, instead of the current state, where $1 ALD is LESS valuable than $1 USD.&quot;

The problem is that the USD continuously falls in value as the money supply is inflated.

This causes a problem for both NORFED and the government.

NORFED tries to solve it by step adjustments in the value of the silver ounce ALD so that it alternately jumps above and then decays back towards parity, tracking the USD price of silver, over the long term.

Yhe government tries to solve the problem by first shifting from precious metals to ever cheaper base metals, and when even that can&#039;t keep up with unrelenting money supply inflation, it declares that it is illegal to melt down pennies to recover their copper value.

And the government makes no attempt to otherwise deal with previously minted coins that price themselves out of circulation.

Regards, Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>&#8220;It would, if they kept the same base rate, mean that $1 ALD is MORE valuable than $1 USD, instead of the current state, where $1 ALD is LESS valuable than $1 USD.&#8221;</p>
<p>The problem is that the USD continuously falls in value as the money supply is inflated.</p>
<p>This causes a problem for both NORFED and the government.</p>
<p>NORFED tries to solve it by step adjustments in the value of the silver ounce ALD so that it alternately jumps above and then decays back towards parity, tracking the USD price of silver, over the long term.</p>
<p>Yhe government tries to solve the problem by first shifting from precious metals to ever cheaper base metals, and when even that can&#8217;t keep up with unrelenting money supply inflation, it declares that it is illegal to melt down pennies to recover their copper value.</p>
<p>And the government makes no attempt to otherwise deal with previously minted coins that price themselves out of circulation.</p>
<p>Regards, Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin S. Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44438</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin S. Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44438</guid>
		<description>I find this to be the most important debate in modern American times.

My name may be familiar to some from my position and demands for deeply honest answers (regardless the pain) toward understanding 9/11 and the wars based upon its arguable myth.  Yet, I&#039;d sooner trade the importance I see in THAT issue, behind the importance of coming to grips with the nature and mechanisms fraudulently underwriting the U.S. Dollar.

We will have plenty of time to investigate and apprehend the crafty players behind 9/11, if only we can survive the turmoil afoot in unraveling the most massive and deleterious &quot;money&quot; scam the world has ever seen; the U.S. Dollar unconstitutionally created out of thin air through the con of Federal Reserve Notes.

Hold tight dear friends of liberty, freedom, peace and prosperity...   our world is going to be rocked hard even further than we may have ever imagined.

Could it possibly be, that the occupiers of high office in U.S. governance are so completely ignorant of the details in this case...  OR, that influential movers and shakers KNOW exactly what they are doing, traitorously cognizant that what they do imperils America to her core?  &quot;A plan&quot; of hellishly devious greed and power of the few seeking control over the many?

The truth will out, for she is unstoppable.

Erin S. Myers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this to be the most important debate in modern American times.</p>
<p>My name may be familiar to some from my position and demands for deeply honest answers (regardless the pain) toward understanding 9/11 and the wars based upon its arguable myth.  Yet, I&#8217;d sooner trade the importance I see in THAT issue, behind the importance of coming to grips with the nature and mechanisms fraudulently underwriting the U.S. Dollar.</p>
<p>We will have plenty of time to investigate and apprehend the crafty players behind 9/11, if only we can survive the turmoil afoot in unraveling the most massive and deleterious &#8220;money&#8221; scam the world has ever seen; the U.S. Dollar unconstitutionally created out of thin air through the con of Federal Reserve Notes.</p>
<p>Hold tight dear friends of liberty, freedom, peace and prosperity&#8230;   our world is going to be rocked hard even further than we may have ever imagined.</p>
<p>Could it possibly be, that the occupiers of high office in U.S. governance are so completely ignorant of the details in this case&#8230;  OR, that influential movers and shakers KNOW exactly what they are doing, traitorously cognizant that what they do imperils America to her core?  &#8220;A plan&#8221; of hellishly devious greed and power of the few seeking control over the many?</p>
<p>The truth will out, for she is unstoppable.</p>
<p>Erin S. Myers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OGC</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44432</link>
		<dc:creator>OGC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44432</guid>
		<description>small correction to above entry-  A liberty can be bought for 95.3 cents by an associate, not 95.7-- sorry for the mathematical error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>small correction to above entry-  A liberty can be bought for 95.3 cents by an associate, not 95.7&#8211; sorry for the mathematical error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OGC</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44431</link>
		<dc:creator>OGC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44431</guid>
		<description>In defense of the Liberty Dollar and those who &quot;profit&quot; by it, you need to understand how the profit is intended to be made.  

Currently, with the price of Silver, 1 Liberty Dollar = .86 Cents 

The Liberty Dollars are purchased by associtates at a discount, currently the discount is 4.7%, so a 1$ liberty can be bought by an associate right now for 95.7 cents.  (Not a huge profit)  

But merchants who accept liberty dollars profit by giving liberty dollars as change-- They profit because not every merchant in town will accept liberty dollars, so if a customer voluntarily agrees to accept the liberties as change, they will most likely come back and use the liberties in the future for more purchases, making a repeat customer.  More sales means more profits.  The more people who use liberty dollars in a community will bring business to those merchants who accept the liberty dollars.  That is how they profit.

It is not a multi-level marketing scheme, however, you can call it a single-tier sponsorship program, much like amazon.com or paypal use.  For every associate you personally sponsor, you get 100 liberty dollars. No multi-level marketing.  It&#039;s designed to encourage more people to use the voluntary currency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In defense of the Liberty Dollar and those who &#8220;profit&#8221; by it, you need to understand how the profit is intended to be made.  </p>
<p>Currently, with the price of Silver, 1 Liberty Dollar = .86 Cents </p>
<p>The Liberty Dollars are purchased by associtates at a discount, currently the discount is 4.7%, so a 1$ liberty can be bought by an associate right now for 95.7 cents.  (Not a huge profit)  </p>
<p>But merchants who accept liberty dollars profit by giving liberty dollars as change&#8211; They profit because not every merchant in town will accept liberty dollars, so if a customer voluntarily agrees to accept the liberties as change, they will most likely come back and use the liberties in the future for more purchases, making a repeat customer.  More sales means more profits.  The more people who use liberty dollars in a community will bring business to those merchants who accept the liberty dollars.  That is how they profit.</p>
<p>It is not a multi-level marketing scheme, however, you can call it a single-tier sponsorship program, much like amazon.com or paypal use.  For every associate you personally sponsor, you get 100 liberty dollars. No multi-level marketing.  It&#8217;s designed to encourage more people to use the voluntary currency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JKHutz</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44429</link>
		<dc:creator>JKHutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/#comment-44429</guid>
		<description>Ummm... ALL specie coins are sold at prices ABOVE the spot value of the metal in the coin.

Duh, it&#039;s not a scam, it&#039;s called &quot;Seigniorage&quot; (see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seigniorage ).

The US Mint does it on a regular basis -- normally ridiculously so. (Oh, and the minted &quot;dollar designation&quot; on the coins from the US mint are FAR MORE deceptive and fraudulent than anything from the Liberty Dollar folks.)

Personally, I think they should NOT have put a &quot;dollar value&quot; on the damn things at all -- but instead should have just BOLDLY stated the specie value of the coin itself, i.e. ONE OUNCE PURE GOLD, etc. (obviously with the 99.999% purity disclaimer value in fine print, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230; ALL specie coins are sold at prices ABOVE the spot value of the metal in the coin.</p>
<p>Duh, it&#8217;s not a scam, it&#8217;s called &#8220;Seigniorage&#8221; (see here: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seigniorage" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seigniorage</a> ).</p>
<p>The US Mint does it on a regular basis &#8212; normally ridiculously so. (Oh, and the minted &#8220;dollar designation&#8221; on the coins from the US mint are FAR MORE deceptive and fraudulent than anything from the Liberty Dollar folks.)</p>
<p>Personally, I think they should NOT have put a &#8220;dollar value&#8221; on the damn things at all &#8212; but instead should have just BOLDLY stated the specie value of the coin itself, i.e. ONE OUNCE PURE GOLD, etc. (obviously with the 99.999% purity disclaimer value in fine print, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
