<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitt Romney&#8217;s Religious Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/27/mitt-romneys-religious-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/27/mitt-romneys-religious-test/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LBest</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/27/mitt-romneys-religious-test/#comment-45695</link>
		<dc:creator>LBest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/27/mitt-romneys-religious-test/#comment-45695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Putting a Muslim in a high level government post will not stop another attack by radicals.  They are radicals and are not interested in talking. Besides if we are to believe that only a small % of muslims are radicals then a non-radical muslim would be of no use in speaking to them.  The same logic is radical mormans that believe a few wifes are ok but hey if we put a morman in office he can talk some sense into them.  A radicals faith is not the same as a non radicals faith no matter what religion you are talking about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting a Muslim in a high level government post will not stop another attack by radicals.  They are radicals and are not interested in talking. Besides if we are to believe that only a small % of muslims are radicals then a non-radical muslim would be of no use in speaking to them.  The same logic is radical mormans that believe a few wifes are ok but hey if we put a morman in office he can talk some sense into them.  A radicals faith is not the same as a non radicals faith no matter what religion you are talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/27/mitt-romneys-religious-test/#comment-45693</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/27/mitt-romneys-religious-test/#comment-45693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is anybody surprised that Mitt Romney has not only changed his mind on religious tests for office once, but has now changed his mind on the subject again.

No wonder why he&#039;s called Multiple Choice Mitt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anybody surprised that Mitt Romney has not only changed his mind on religious tests for office once, but has now changed his mind on the subject again.</p>
<p>No wonder why he&#8217;s called Multiple Choice Mitt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
