<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Passes SAFE Act &#8212; Do You Feel Safer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Littau</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46942</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Littau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s even more disturbing is that only 2 people voted against it (Ron Paul and Paul Broun). This is yet another example for why we need the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/13/no-legislation-without-representation/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read the Bills Act&lt;/a&gt;. 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s even more disturbing is that only 2 people voted against it (Ron Paul and Paul Broun). This is yet another example for why we need the <a href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/03/13/no-legislation-without-representation/" rel="nofollow">Read the Bills Act</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAFE Bill Doesn't Solve Any Problems &#124; Hear ItFrom.Us</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46941</link>
		<dc:creator>SAFE Bill Doesn't Solve Any Problems &#124; Hear ItFrom.Us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] read a lot of bellyaching today about the SAFE Act.  Mostly people are worried that free WiFi access will disappear from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read a lot of bellyaching today about the SAFE Act.  Mostly people are worried that free WiFi access will disappear from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai MacTane</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46934</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai MacTane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the news article linked to says &quot;the House overwhelmingly voted for the legislation, &lt;b&gt;sending it now to the Senate&lt;/b&gt;&quot; (emphasis added), the line &quot;you’re now legally required to do so&quot; is, at the very best, premature. Nobody is required to do squat until the Senate also passes it (and Bush signs it, but that&#039;s probably a given).

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN00519:&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;companion bill in the Senate&lt;/a&gt; has been referred to the Judiciary committee. I&#039;ve just looked on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the ACLU&#039;s web site&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the EFF&#039;s site&lt;/a&gt; to try to find easy action pages dealing with this, but they seem not to have updated for the Senate-level fight yet.

However, since the Senate Judiciary Committee is currently embroiled in the whole &quot;give the telecoms retroactive immunity for helping the government spy on everyone&quot; scandal, the EFF has &lt;a href=&quot;https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?alertId=325&amp;pg=makeACall&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a page for contacting your senator about that issue&lt;/a&gt;. I&#039;m sure it would be easy to use some of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/censorship/32997leg20071205.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the ACLU&#039;s talking points about the House version&lt;/a&gt; when calling your senator&#160;&#8212; especially if your senator should happen to sit on the Judiciary Committee.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the news article linked to says &#8220;the House overwhelmingly voted for the legislation, <b>sending it now to the Senate</b>&#8221; (emphasis added), the line &#8220;you’re now legally required to do so&#8221; is, at the very best, premature. Nobody is required to do squat until the Senate also passes it (and Bush signs it, but that&#8217;s probably a given).</p>
<p>The <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN00519:" rel="nofollow">companion bill in the Senate</a> has been referred to the Judiciary committee. I&#8217;ve just looked on <a href="http://www.aclu.org" rel="nofollow">the ACLU&#8217;s web site</a> and <a href="http://www.eff.org" rel="nofollow">the EFF&#8217;s site</a> to try to find easy action pages dealing with this, but they seem not to have updated for the Senate-level fight yet.</p>
<p>However, since the Senate Judiciary Committee is currently embroiled in the whole &#8220;give the telecoms retroactive immunity for helping the government spy on everyone&#8221; scandal, the EFF has <a href="https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?alertId=325&amp;pg=makeACall" rel="nofollow">a page for contacting your senator about that issue</a>. I&#8217;m sure it would be easy to use some of <a href="http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/censorship/32997leg20071205.html" rel="nofollow">the ACLU&#8217;s talking points about the House version</a> when calling your senator&nbsp;&mdash; especially if your senator should happen to sit on the Judiciary Committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somebody</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46928</link>
		<dc:creator>somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m gonna start distributing stick-man porn. That&#039;ll get the politicians riled up! One of them is under 18.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna start distributing stick-man porn. That&#8217;ll get the politicians riled up! One of them is under 18.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TanGeng</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46927</link>
		<dc:creator>TanGeng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/congress-passes-safe-act-do-you-feel-safer/#comment-46927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know this has virtually the effect of shutting down or making cost prohibitive all public WI-FI spots.  There has to be some big tel-comm support.  I know it sounds like a conspiracy, but what the hell.  I don&#039;t see how it makes anyone safer and it has the effect of destroying access to Wi-Fi.

&quot;It&#039;s for the children&quot; benefits the big ass tel-comm corporations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know this has virtually the effect of shutting down or making cost prohibitive all public WI-FI spots.  There has to be some big tel-comm support.  I know it sounds like a conspiracy, but what the hell.  I don&#8217;t see how it makes anyone safer and it has the effect of destroying access to Wi-Fi.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s for the children&#8221; benefits the big ass tel-comm corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
