<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mortgage Bailout &#8212; Isn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TanGeng</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-47028</link>
		<dc:creator>TanGeng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-47028</guid>
		<description>Brad,

From what I can tell, this law isn&#039;t targeted at sub-prime mortgages or what&#039;s considered the risking portion of the mortgage industry.  This law is targeted at non-conforming mortgages to individuals that were eligible for prime interest rates.  It&#039;s applicable to the entire mortgage industry.

We keep pounding on &quot;sub-prime! sub-prime!&quot;  but the law is aimed at preempt a meltdown for the entire industry.  Basically, it looks like we&#039;re only at the tip of the iceberg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>From what I can tell, this law isn&#8217;t targeted at sub-prime mortgages or what&#8217;s considered the risking portion of the mortgage industry.  This law is targeted at non-conforming mortgages to individuals that were eligible for prime interest rates.  It&#8217;s applicable to the entire mortgage industry.</p>
<p>We keep pounding on &#8220;sub-prime! sub-prime!&#8221;  but the law is aimed at preempt a meltdown for the entire industry.  Basically, it looks like we&#8217;re only at the tip of the iceberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Casey (Mortgage Foreclosure Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-47015</link>
		<dc:creator>John Casey (Mortgage Foreclosure Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-47015</guid>
		<description>Brad,

You&#039;re totally right. The government doesn&#039;t really care about the average citizen. This bailout is designed for the banks and lenders not citizens. If it cared more about the citizens it would create a plan that benefited the home owners and not the lenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re totally right. The government doesn&#8217;t really care about the average citizen. This bailout is designed for the banks and lenders not citizens. If it cared more about the citizens it would create a plan that benefited the home owners and not the lenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46990</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 05:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46990</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

I&#039;m not sure that it&#039;s a &quot;new&quot; interpretation, rather it&#039;s a question that hadn&#039;t been asked.  I don&#039;t think this interpretation changes an existing interpretation, as much as it clarifies an unclear portion of the rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that it&#8217;s a &#8220;new&#8221; interpretation, rather it&#8217;s a question that hadn&#8217;t been asked.  I don&#8217;t think this interpretation changes an existing interpretation, as much as it clarifies an unclear portion of the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Buist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mortage Rate Freeze</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46987</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Buist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mortage Rate Freeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46987</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting post up over at The Liberty Papers: The Mortgage Bailout - Isn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting post up over at The Liberty Papers: The Mortgage Bailout &#8211; Isn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molby</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 02:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46983</guid>
		<description>Ok, Brad, but someone, somewhere probably made their decision based on the original interpretation, no? Isn&#039;t it possible that that person, whoever it may be, is the one getting screwed by change in interpretation?

No matter how you slice it, the rules are being changed midway through the game and someone will clearly benefit. How can you be so sure there isn&#039;t someone losing too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, Brad, but someone, somewhere probably made their decision based on the original interpretation, no? Isn&#8217;t it possible that that person, whoever it may be, is the one getting screwed by change in interpretation?</p>
<p>No matter how you slice it, the rules are being changed midway through the game and someone will clearly benefit. How can you be so sure there isn&#8217;t someone losing too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46973</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46973</guid>
		<description>LOL...  Jeff, I was wondering if someone was going to catch that.

If anything, it&#039;s &quot;bailout&quot; of lenders rather than borrowers.  The reason I said it wasn&#039;t a bailout is that it&#039;s the borrowers that everyone is mad about, because this is seen as a giveaway to them.

At the same time, it&#039;s not really a &quot;bailout&quot; of the lenders, because the feds aren&#039;t actually giving them money, loans, etc to prop them up.  All they&#039;re really doing is giving them legal cover to do something that might have been a legal gray area previously.  I don&#039;t really see that as a bailout, in the traditional sense of the term.  It&#039;s more of a &quot;deregulation&quot;, which is still a misnomer because the regulation hasn&#039;t changed, there&#039;s only been a wider interpretation of it by the regulators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;  Jeff, I was wondering if someone was going to catch that.</p>
<p>If anything, it&#8217;s &#8220;bailout&#8221; of lenders rather than borrowers.  The reason I said it wasn&#8217;t a bailout is that it&#8217;s the borrowers that everyone is mad about, because this is seen as a giveaway to them.</p>
<p>At the same time, it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;bailout&#8221; of the lenders, because the feds aren&#8217;t actually giving them money, loans, etc to prop them up.  All they&#8217;re really doing is giving them legal cover to do something that might have been a legal gray area previously.  I don&#8217;t really see that as a bailout, in the traditional sense of the term.  It&#8217;s more of a &#8220;deregulation&#8221;, which is still a misnomer because the regulation hasn&#8217;t changed, there&#8217;s only been a wider interpretation of it by the regulators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molby</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46971</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46971</guid>
		<description>I know very little about this stuff, but...
&lt;blockquote&gt;This isn’t a giveaway to borrowers.
This isn’t a violation of investors’ contracts with lenders.
This isn’t costing the taxpayer money.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So there is no &quot;seen&quot; bailout, but I don&#039;t see how you can say this...

&lt;blockquote&gt;But this isn’t really all about helping borrowers, it’s about letting lenders find a way out of this mess without going belly-up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
...without there being some sort of &quot;unseen&quot; bailout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know very little about this stuff, but&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>This isn’t a giveaway to borrowers.<br />
This isn’t a violation of investors’ contracts with lenders.<br />
This isn’t costing the taxpayer money.
</p></blockquote>
<p>So there is no &#8220;seen&#8221; bailout, but I don&#8217;t see how you can say this&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>But this isn’t really all about helping borrowers, it’s about letting lenders find a way out of this mess without going belly-up.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;without there being some sort of &#8220;unseen&#8221; bailout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46970</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/12/07/the-mortgage-bailout-isnt/#comment-46970</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update Brad....I&#039;ll put down the pitchfork...for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Brad&#8230;.I&#8217;ll put down the pitchfork&#8230;for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

