Education myself does not mean reading the inane rantings of anti-semitic losers.

At this point I will probably stay home on Election Day

Hey doug I forgot, which dead horse are you voting for again? Was it Rudy or McCain?

Actually, since most libertarians don’t bother to read Stormfront and don’t have any interest in the majority of agendas they push most of us could care less who’s “really” running it. Doesn’t change my beliefs on anything one iota, even if your link proved it conclusively (which it doesn’t). It’s as much of a non-issue as bitching about the ideological purity of legal campaign donors.

Thanks, but no thanks.

BUSTED! SO-CALLED WHITE SUPREMICIST GROUP EXPOSED AS ISRAELI PROPAGANDA OPERATION!

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/whitesupremicistisisraelishill.php

Actually, it’s just a sign that the campaign is being run by people who have some guts to stand up to nonsense.

Its just a sign that the campaign is not run by people who know what they’re doing when it comes to public relations.

I don’t know, I’d say it’s been handled. The story has honestly come and gone, much like the false perpetuations of racism, and are only being held on to, as Jeff noted, by people who have beef with the Paul campaign. Outside of here and Cavuto, I haven’t even heard much about it, either due to it being a non-issue or just a sense of apathy/unawareness for the campaign.

It just seems that you are trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill here.

I know you haven’t sent a dime to Paul, but I would hope they would return the money for misappropirating Pat Henry’s name, indeed a real crime.

Its just a sign that the campaign is not run by people who know what they’re doing when it comes to public relations.

Likewise, it sounds like some of his supporters don’t know what they’re doing when it comes to public relations.

Its just a sign that the campaign is not run by people who know what they’re doing when it comes to public relations.

If you do decide to support Mike Huckabee because he is only accepting “clean money” I, as a Ron Paul supporter, will wish you well with no hard feelings. 8-)

“Why does there need to be a “pro-liberty” angle?”

Because the Liberty Papers header says that’s the point of this site. And because continually nitpicking the only pro-liberty candidate in the race works against that.

“And if this story costs one vote, its already cost more than the $ 500 they got.”

If the point of this site were dispensing advice on how to run a flawless campaign I’d consider that a relevant point. But since neither you nor I work for the Paul campaign, and since the candidate has already addressed the reasons why he’s not returning the money, it’s not relevant. If you’re unhappy that Ron Paul didn’t take your advice, perhaps you should have volunteered to work for his campaign in a position where your advice was valued. Since you’ve rather proudly trumpeted your decision not to be involved with the Paul campaign, that’s really your cross to bear…and your continued harping about how the Paul campaign was unwise not to accept your unsolicited campaign advice has got nothing to do with pushing a pro-freedom position. Move on.

The only people I’ve heard talk about this are people that already have a beef against him, Doug.

If Paul is going to do better than the 6-8% he’s doing in New Hampshire polling right now, he needs to attract independent voters who historically don’t vote on the basis of ideology. Stories like this turn people like that off.

Of course, Paul could have a problem attracting independents in NH anyway. They seem to be breaking heavily for Obama right now.