<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DoJ and DC Gun Ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Intelligence Agency &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are You Ready To Make A Choice?</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49449</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar Intelligence Agency &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are You Ready To Make A Choice?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of us don&#8217;t.  They take political gambles with your first amendment rights, and lose.  They allow for the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of us don&#8217;t.  They take political gambles with your first amendment rights, and lose.  They allow for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49097</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t amazing as all the sheeple argue over the actual author of Mr. Constitution&#039;s 15yr old ghost written racists remark, the machine is implementing the Real ID and taking a way gun rights.... 

 Sing along everyone!! Only in America!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t amazing as all the sheeple argue over the actual author of Mr. Constitution&#8217;s 15yr old ghost written racists remark, the machine is implementing the Real ID and taking a way gun rights&#8230;. </p>
<p> Sing along everyone!! Only in America!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UCrawford</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49095</link>
		<dc:creator>UCrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes these articles really depress me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes these articles really depress me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49094</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly, I doubt Bush ever heard about this brief; but that doesn’t excuse it.

The fact is, both the democrat and republican parties server their true constituency: The Federal Government.

A blanket ruling here would be a huge blow to government power as a whole. Affirming a right of the people, without burden of repressive regulation, sets a precedent that the government does not want set.

From a purely practical standpoint, the DOJ knows, that based on such a ruling, they would have to fight an appeal on every single possession only gun charge since the dawn of time; and most of the “unlawfully modified” and “unregistered” charges. Yeah, most of them would be tossed out, but it would be expensive and time consuming.

If the court instead delivers a limited ruling, it would leave out most of these grounds for appeal.

It would also, of course, preserve a lot of jobs for federal agents (not just the ATF).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I doubt Bush ever heard about this brief; but that doesn’t excuse it.</p>
<p>The fact is, both the democrat and republican parties server their true constituency: The Federal Government.</p>
<p>A blanket ruling here would be a huge blow to government power as a whole. Affirming a right of the people, without burden of repressive regulation, sets a precedent that the government does not want set.</p>
<p>From a purely practical standpoint, the DOJ knows, that based on such a ruling, they would have to fight an appeal on every single possession only gun charge since the dawn of time; and most of the “unlawfully modified” and “unregistered” charges. Yeah, most of them would be tossed out, but it would be expensive and time consuming.</p>
<p>If the court instead delivers a limited ruling, it would leave out most of these grounds for appeal.</p>
<p>It would also, of course, preserve a lot of jobs for federal agents (not just the ATF).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UCrawford</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49090</link>
		<dc:creator>UCrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t say I&#039;m surprised...Bush is a nanny-stater and this action is completely in line with how he views us:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/09/02/card_says_bush_sees_us_as_a_child_needing_a_parent/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m surprised&#8230;Bush is a nanny-stater and this action is completely in line with how he views us:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/09/02/card_says_bush_sees_us_as_a_child_needing_a_parent/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/09/02/card_says_bush_sees_us_as_a_child_needing_a_parent/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49084</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I don’t see what part of the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is so damned hard to understand.&lt;/i&gt;

[Bush]Because the Constitution is just a goddamn piece of paper[/Bush]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don’t see what part of the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is so damned hard to understand.</i></p>
<p>[Bush]Because the Constitution is just a goddamn piece of paper[/Bush]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uhm</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49079</link>
		<dc:creator>uhm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/01/11/doj-and-dc-gun-ban/#comment-49079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder what philosophies these people hold where they don&#039;t respect people&#039;s natural rights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what philosophies these people hold where they don&#8217;t respect people&#8217;s natural rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
