<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Members of Congress file brief in Heller case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/08/members-of-congress-file-brief-in-heller-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/08/members-of-congress-file-brief-in-heller-case/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/08/members-of-congress-file-brief-in-heller-case/#comment-51875</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/08/members-of-congress-file-brief-in-heller-case/#comment-51875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grrrrrrr.....it really chafes me when people that signed the Patriot Act start quoting the constitution as if it were the definitive answer, then turn around and say the constitution should be interpreted favorably when they want to pass laws with power not granted to them.  Stop using the interstate commerce clause to allow you to pass any number of retarded laws and maybe then you have a leg to stand on when you argue a strict constructionist view for other sections of it.  I fucking hate cherry picking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grrrrrrr&#8230;..it really chafes me when people that signed the Patriot Act start quoting the constitution as if it were the definitive answer, then turn around and say the constitution should be interpreted favorably when they want to pass laws with power not granted to them.  Stop using the interstate commerce clause to allow you to pass any number of retarded laws and maybe then you have a leg to stand on when you argue a strict constructionist view for other sections of it.  I fucking hate cherry picking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers &#187;Blog Archive &#187; Respondents File Brief In D.C. v. Heller</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/08/members-of-congress-file-brief-in-heller-case/#comment-51729</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers &#187;Blog Archive &#187; Respondents File Brief In D.C. v. Heller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/08/members-of-congress-file-brief-in-heller-case/#comment-51729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Jason noted earlier today, there was also an amicus brief filed by members of Congress in addition to several other amicus briefs in support of Heller&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason noted earlier today, there was also an amicus brief filed by members of Congress in addition to several other amicus briefs in support of Heller&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oilnwater</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/08/members-of-congress-file-brief-in-heller-case/#comment-51683</link>
		<dc:creator>oilnwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/08/members-of-congress-file-brief-in-heller-case/#comment-51683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what is the crux of the -collective right- argument?  if deemed a collective right, does that mean a citizen&#039;s gun ownership is only guaranteed if serving in the proper US military, or a legally formed militia and not guaranteed ownership of a personal firearm?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the crux of the -collective right- argument?  if deemed a collective right, does that mean a citizen&#8217;s gun ownership is only guaranteed if serving in the proper US military, or a legally formed militia and not guaranteed ownership of a personal firearm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
