Comments on: Ralph Nader: Jeffersonian ? I Don’t Think So

By: Nitroadict

Nitroadict — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:03:16 +0000

The only thing that pisses me off are the whiny, bickering children who still to this day, think Nader gave Bush the White House, despite more Democrats voting for Bush than for Nader, and despite the Supreme Ruling decision, which, I hardly think Nader had any influence over, other than reading it in the paper.

I’ve said it many times to some of my idiotic, pseduo-Socialist friends: If the Democrats can’t win because of a 0.3 variance by a benign Socialist campaign by a more benign man, they don’t deserve to be a party, let alone “win”.

In any case, Nader is still singing that same tune no one wants to really hear, mainly because Nader can’t sing.

By: Brian T. Traylor

Brian T. Traylor — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:10:23 +0000

I’m not which upsets me more. The fact that this old gasbag is running again or that he’s appropriating the name of a true American hero.

Are you kidding? Easy choice: the latter. Who cares if he runs – he pulled in 0.3% of the vote in 2004. Electorally speaking, he’s even more insignificant than RP.

By: RegularRon

RegularRon — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:08:28 +0000

You know, as much as I disagree with 95% that comes out of Ralphs mouth. I have to say, I admire him for believing in what he says. Not some double speakin regular politician. He’s not afraid to admit, he loves Government. Socialism is his goal. He doesn’t make any bones about it.

And for his “Jeffersonian” comment, that’s as moronic as it get’s coming from him. He really hasn’t read anything T.J. said or wrote. Oh well.