<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Threat To Limited Government In 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/03/26/the-threat-to-limited-government-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/03/26/the-threat-to-limited-government-in-2008/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mataconis</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/03/26/the-threat-to-limited-government-in-2008/#comment-54443</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/03/26/the-threat-to-limited-government-in-2008/#comment-54443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephan,

Until he actually names a program, his rhetoric is a phony as GWB&#039;s in my book.

I&#039;ve already made it clear that I will not vote for McCain solely based on McCain-Feingold. A man who has such a low opinion of the First Amendment doesn&#039;t deserve to be President.

Others, of course, can make their own choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephan,</p>
<p>Until he actually names a program, his rhetoric is a phony as GWB&#8217;s in my book.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already made it clear that I will not vote for McCain solely based on McCain-Feingold. A man who has such a low opinion of the First Amendment doesn&#8217;t deserve to be President.</p>
<p>Others, of course, can make their own choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Littau</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/03/26/the-threat-to-limited-government-in-2008/#comment-54439</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Littau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/03/26/the-threat-to-limited-government-in-2008/#comment-54439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;[N]one of the remaining three candidates who will occupy the White House on January 20, 2009 has pledged to eliminate or even reduce a single federal spending program.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To be fair Doug, I found the following from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/0B8E4DB8-5B0C-459F-97EA-D7B542A78235.htm &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;McCain&#039;s website&lt;/a&gt;: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;John McCain will provide the courageous leadership necessary to control spending, including: 

- Eliminate broken government programs. The federal government itself admits that 1 in 5 programs do not perform. 

-Reform our civil service system to promote accountability and good performance in our federal workforce. 

-Eliminate earmarks, wasteful subsidies, and pork-barrel spending. 

-Reform procurement programs and cut wasteful spending in defense and non-defense programs. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure, he didn&#039;t name any specific programs but he at least seems to recognize that there is a problem with wasteful spending. The real question is, will he make good on this promise? I tend to think he will based on his voting record. Citizens Against Government Waste give McCain a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cagw.org/site/VoteCenter?congress=109&amp;repId=122&amp;session_num=0&amp;page=legScore&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lifetime rating of 88% &quot;taxpayer hero.&quot; &lt;/a&gt;McCain&#039;s score is among the highest in the Senate (the Senate average rating was 29% in 2006). 

I have many problems with John McCain (many of which you have mentioned here and in other posts) but fiscal responsibility is not one of them. If I were to vote solely on the basis of the economy and government waste issues, I would easily support John McCain for president. 

Unfortunately, he is wrong on so many other issues. His attacks on individual liberty, his calls for sacrifice and “national service” bother me a great deal. I’m also afraid that he would expand the scope of the war to include Iran and eventually call for a draft (which is completely unacceptable to me). 

I won&#039;t say that I would never vote for John McCain but if I were to vote today, I would probably support the Libertarian candidate. We basically have the choice of two evils; this is why I call this the &quot;Choose and Lose Election.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>[N]one of the remaining three candidates who will occupy the White House on January 20, 2009 has pledged to eliminate or even reduce a single federal spending program.</p></blockquote>
<p>To be fair Doug, I found the following from <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/0B8E4DB8-5B0C-459F-97EA-D7B542A78235.htm " rel="nofollow">McCain&#8217;s website</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>John McCain will provide the courageous leadership necessary to control spending, including: </p>
<p>- Eliminate broken government programs. The federal government itself admits that 1 in 5 programs do not perform. </p>
<p>-Reform our civil service system to promote accountability and good performance in our federal workforce. </p>
<p>-Eliminate earmarks, wasteful subsidies, and pork-barrel spending. </p>
<p>-Reform procurement programs and cut wasteful spending in defense and non-defense programs. </p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, he didn&#8217;t name any specific programs but he at least seems to recognize that there is a problem with wasteful spending. The real question is, will he make good on this promise? I tend to think he will based on his voting record. Citizens Against Government Waste give McCain a <a href="http://www.cagw.org/site/VoteCenter?congress=109&#038;repId=122&#038;session_num=0&#038;page=legScore" rel="nofollow">lifetime rating of 88% &#8220;taxpayer hero.&#8221; </a>McCain&#8217;s score is among the highest in the Senate (the Senate average rating was 29% in 2006). </p>
<p>I have many problems with John McCain (many of which you have mentioned here and in other posts) but fiscal responsibility is not one of them. If I were to vote solely on the basis of the economy and government waste issues, I would easily support John McCain for president. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, he is wrong on so many other issues. His attacks on individual liberty, his calls for sacrifice and “national service” bother me a great deal. I’m also afraid that he would expand the scope of the war to include Iran and eventually call for a draft (which is completely unacceptable to me). </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t say that I would never vote for John McCain but if I were to vote today, I would probably support the Libertarian candidate. We basically have the choice of two evils; this is why I call this the &#8220;Choose and Lose Election.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitroadict</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/03/26/the-threat-to-limited-government-in-2008/#comment-54437</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitroadict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/03/26/the-threat-to-limited-government-in-2008/#comment-54437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Essentially, we&#039;re all further screwed.  I&#039;ll be keeping my horse carriage ready in case anyone wants to give another go at a Continental Congress for a new nation.  Bear in my mind, the winter&#039;s get harsh around here, so please send any mail at least a season or two in advance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Essentially, we&#8217;re all further screwed.  I&#8217;ll be keeping my horse carriage ready in case anyone wants to give another go at a Continental Congress for a new nation.  Bear in my mind, the winter&#8217;s get harsh around here, so please send any mail at least a season or two in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
