<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elect, Disapprove, Elect &#8212; Rinse And Repeat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/02/elect-disapprove-elect-rinse-and-repeat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/02/elect-disapprove-elect-rinse-and-repeat/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/02/elect-disapprove-elect-rinse-and-repeat/#comment-56545</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=2612#comment-56545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what I like to call systemic data. It shows the behavior of the system. There are several constraints that define the system, and those constraints determine the behavior of it.

For example why are there two major parties? What makes two such a magic number in our current system. It&#039;s the constraints. Primarily it is the voting method of 1st past the post. This constraint works to eliminate 3rd parties by moving them to the spoiler category. As long as this spoiler factor is in place two will remain a magic number.

You want to change our system then you need to change the constraints. That&#039;s why I think that if you really want change, we need to institute some form of ranked choice balloting. That way we eliminate the spoiler effect and independents will have a choice to vote other than &quot;against the party in power.&quot; Which of course means the other &quot;major&quot; party since voting 3rd party is a vote for the status quo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I like to call systemic data. It shows the behavior of the system. There are several constraints that define the system, and those constraints determine the behavior of it.</p>
<p>For example why are there two major parties? What makes two such a magic number in our current system. It&#8217;s the constraints. Primarily it is the voting method of 1st past the post. This constraint works to eliminate 3rd parties by moving them to the spoiler category. As long as this spoiler factor is in place two will remain a magic number.</p>
<p>You want to change our system then you need to change the constraints. That&#8217;s why I think that if you really want change, we need to institute some form of ranked choice balloting. That way we eliminate the spoiler effect and independents will have a choice to vote other than &#8220;against the party in power.&#8221; Which of course means the other &#8220;major&#8221; party since voting 3rd party is a vote for the status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
