<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember Kelo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/21/remember-kelo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/21/remember-kelo/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreedomSight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Kelo Anniversary</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/21/remember-kelo/#comment-56997</link>
		<dc:creator>FreedomSight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Kelo Anniversary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=2635#comment-56997</guid>
		<description>[...] Pye, at The Liberty Papers:Remember Kelo. He starts of with a quote that&#8217;s going into my file. The moment the idea is admitted into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pye, at The Liberty Papers:Remember Kelo. He starts of with a quote that&#8217;s going into my file. The moment the idea is admitted into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Bowen</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/21/remember-kelo/#comment-56995</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=2635#comment-56995</guid>
		<description>What great timing!  &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/06/dem_to_bush_drop_dead_on_offsh.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; doesn&#039;t have much to do with Kelo, but it does belong in the &quot;property rights&quot; category.

Pay close attention to what Rep. Hinchey (D-NY) said in response to a question that a reporter asked in response to something that he said earlier.  For those of you who don&#039;t want to read the partial transcript provide by the Chicago Tribune, here are the relevant parts:

Rep. Hinchey:
&lt;blockquote&gt; Our Republican friends also talk about the need to, you know, set up ways in which the material can be refined; refineries. Well, do we own refineries? No, the oil companies own refineries.

Should the people of the United States own refineries? Maybe so. Frankly I think that&#039;s a good idea. Then we could control the amount of refined product much more capably that gets out on the market.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Reporter:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;ve got a question about the issue of -- you mentioned the issue of nationalizing refineries and having nationally owned refinery capacity. A lot of other countries have nationalized their oil industry. You mentioned that the oil and gas companies may not want to drill on these lands, so that they can take advantage of ever- higher gas prices. Is there any thought to having bills that would nationalize some of these refineries or start a national oil company?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Rep. Hinchey:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, there&#039;s thought going on about this. Frankly, this is something that I think is essential. And I think it&#039;s only a matter of time before it takes place. I think that the -- we&#039;ll -- what we have to do has to be in the interest of the American people, primarily, basically, in the interest of the American people, not in the interest of some major corporations. And the determination as to how much of this very important material gets refined, and consequently out on the market, is in the hands of the oil companies. And they just do. They make those decisions based upon their efforts to drive up the price as high as they can and keep it as high as they can for as long as they can.

So I think that this is something that this Congress should be thinking about. And certainly it&#039;s something that I&#039;m thinking about, and I think that there are a few others already in the Congress who are thinking about it as well.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Question: how is what they&#039;re proposing different than what Hugo Chavez did?

Seriously...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What great timing!  <a href="http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/06/dem_to_bush_drop_dead_on_offsh.html" rel="nofollow">This</a> doesn&#8217;t have much to do with Kelo, but it does belong in the &#8220;property rights&#8221; category.</p>
<p>Pay close attention to what Rep. Hinchey (D-NY) said in response to a question that a reporter asked in response to something that he said earlier.  For those of you who don&#8217;t want to read the partial transcript provide by the Chicago Tribune, here are the relevant parts:</p>
<p>Rep. Hinchey:</p>
<blockquote><p> Our Republican friends also talk about the need to, you know, set up ways in which the material can be refined; refineries. Well, do we own refineries? No, the oil companies own refineries.</p>
<p>Should the people of the United States own refineries? Maybe so. Frankly I think that&#8217;s a good idea. Then we could control the amount of refined product much more capably that gets out on the market.</p></blockquote>
<p>Reporter:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve got a question about the issue of &#8212; you mentioned the issue of nationalizing refineries and having nationally owned refinery capacity. A lot of other countries have nationalized their oil industry. You mentioned that the oil and gas companies may not want to drill on these lands, so that they can take advantage of ever- higher gas prices. Is there any thought to having bills that would nationalize some of these refineries or start a national oil company?</p></blockquote>
<p>Rep. Hinchey:</p>
<blockquote><p>Yeah, there&#8217;s thought going on about this. Frankly, this is something that I think is essential. And I think it&#8217;s only a matter of time before it takes place. I think that the &#8212; we&#8217;ll &#8212; what we have to do has to be in the interest of the American people, primarily, basically, in the interest of the American people, not in the interest of some major corporations. And the determination as to how much of this very important material gets refined, and consequently out on the market, is in the hands of the oil companies. And they just do. They make those decisions based upon their efforts to drive up the price as high as they can and keep it as high as they can for as long as they can.</p>
<p>So I think that this is something that this Congress should be thinking about. And certainly it&#8217;s something that I&#8217;m thinking about, and I think that there are a few others already in the Congress who are thinking about it as well.</p></blockquote>
<p>Question: how is what they&#8217;re proposing different than what Hugo Chavez did?</p>
<p>Seriously&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

