<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presidential Candidates Respond to D.C. vs. Heller Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/26/presidential-candidates-respond-to-heller-vs-dc-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/26/presidential-candidates-respond-to-heller-vs-dc-ruling/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heller Decision Reached&#8230; 2nd Amendment Upheld &#171; Reclaim Your Republic</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/26/presidential-candidates-respond-to-heller-vs-dc-ruling/#comment-57118</link>
		<dc:creator>Heller Decision Reached&#8230; 2nd Amendment Upheld &#171; Reclaim Your Republic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=2646#comment-57118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Littau has posted all three candidates&#8217; press releases in regard to the Heller decision in a post over at The Liberty Papers.  The Liberty Papers&#8217; current front page is giving a very [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Littau has posted all three candidates&#8217; press releases in regard to the Heller decision in a post over at The Liberty Papers.  The Liberty Papers&#8217; current front page is giving a very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Littau</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/26/presidential-candidates-respond-to-heller-vs-dc-ruling/#comment-57117</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Littau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=2646#comment-57117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama had to be very careful how he worded his response. He doesn&#039;t want to alienate his anti-gun base nor does he want to appear anti-gun to others who support the right to bear arms who would otherwise support him. As I have written before, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/15/obama-tries-to-have-it-both-ways-on-the-second-amendment/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama is trying to have it both wa&lt;/a&gt;ys on this issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama had to be very careful how he worded his response. He doesn&#8217;t want to alienate his anti-gun base nor does he want to appear anti-gun to others who support the right to bear arms who would otherwise support him. As I have written before, <a href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/02/15/obama-tries-to-have-it-both-ways-on-the-second-amendment/" rel="nofollow">Obama is trying to have it both wa</a>ys on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/26/presidential-candidates-respond-to-heller-vs-dc-ruling/#comment-57109</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=2646#comment-57109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McCain&#039;s was only good on substance if you think he believes any of that.  He might, until it gets in the way of any of his &quot;national greatness&quot; BS. 

I agree with you on what Obama said.  Pandering at its best.  How people manage not to see through him and can keep claiming he is somehow different, I do not know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain&#8217;s was only good on substance if you think he believes any of that.  He might, until it gets in the way of any of his &#8220;national greatness&#8221; BS. </p>
<p>I agree with you on what Obama said.  Pandering at its best.  How people manage not to see through him and can keep claiming he is somehow different, I do not know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2008/06/26/presidential-candidates-respond-to-heller-vs-dc-ruling/#comment-57101</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=2646#comment-57101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barr&#039;s response was easily the best.

McCain was good on the substance, but seemed obsessed with Obama during the course of the entire statement.

Obama seems to have four sides of his mouth, because his response was so disjointed that you can&#039;t say he was speaking out of &quot;both&quot; sides of his mouth.  He basically said he disagreed with the decision without saying he disagreed with the decision.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barr&#8217;s response was easily the best.</p>
<p>McCain was good on the substance, but seemed obsessed with Obama during the course of the entire statement.</p>
<p>Obama seems to have four sides of his mouth, because his response was so disjointed that you can&#8217;t say he was speaking out of &#8220;both&#8221; sides of his mouth.  He basically said he disagreed with the decision without saying he disagreed with the decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
