<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote Of The Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/01/12/quote-of-the-day-36/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/01/12/quote-of-the-day-36/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: persnickety curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/01/12/quote-of-the-day-36/#comment-62701</link>
		<dc:creator>persnickety curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=3517#comment-62701</guid>
		<description>Um, are you implying that taking a collection of numerous individual free market transactions (the free market) and aggregating them somehow indicates a complex system?

I beg to differ but it (the free market) is still just a collection of numerous individual and simple transactions. The number of transactions does not speak to the complexity of a system. IE. It is SIMPLE system if it is any system at all.

And does not the term SYSTEM imply design or at least categorization?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, are you implying that taking a collection of numerous individual free market transactions (the free market) and aggregating them somehow indicates a complex system?</p>
<p>I beg to differ but it (the free market) is still just a collection of numerous individual and simple transactions. The number of transactions does not speak to the complexity of a system. IE. It is SIMPLE system if it is any system at all.</p>
<p>And does not the term SYSTEM imply design or at least categorization?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akston</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/01/12/quote-of-the-day-36/#comment-62696</link>
		<dc:creator>Akston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=3517#comment-62696</guid>
		<description>Fantastic quote!  That one goes on the wall-o-good-stuff.

Someone wrote in &quot;That Book&quot;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar&#039;s, and unto God the things which be God&#039;s.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Socialists tend to see a majority of our life&#039;s effort as &quot;things which be Caesar&#039;s&quot;.  Intelligent Designers tend to see our lives themselves as &quot;things which be God&#039;s&quot;.

Yep, this&#039;ll make me lots of nice, happy friends at the next party I attend ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic quote!  That one goes on the wall-o-good-stuff.</p>
<p>Someone wrote in &#8220;That Book&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar&#8217;s, and unto God the things which be God&#8217;s.</p></blockquote>
<p>Socialists tend to see a majority of our life&#8217;s effort as &#8220;things which be Caesar&#8217;s&#8221;.  Intelligent Designers tend to see our lives themselves as &#8220;things which be God&#8217;s&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yep, this&#8217;ll make me lots of nice, happy friends at the next party I attend ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

