<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security theater and online predators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/01/13/security-theater-and-online-predators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/01/13/security-theater-and-online-predators/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:02:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akston</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/01/13/security-theater-and-online-predators/#comment-62717</link>
		<dc:creator>Akston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=3532#comment-62717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems fueled by the kind of hysteria that&#039;s become America&#039;s most common response in the past decade or two.  So many developments are evoking fear-based responses.

This is not to say I&#039;m throwing my hat in as &quot;pedophile-friendly&quot;.  Far from it.  But your post leads me to consider the question:

How many &quot;classes&quot; of citizens should there be?  Regular citizens and second-class-convicted-sentenced-served-and-released citizens?  Will the constitutional guarantees be different for each class?  I guess legally this may indeed be the case.  Should it be?

Shouldn&#039;t the actual sentences convey the explicit and complete penalty assigned by the law?  Maybe they do for sexual abuse in most states.  I don&#039;t know for sure.  I&#039;d be much happier with a system that spelled out exactly what rights will be forfeited when a person is convicted of a crime.  If we want the convicted to never interact with society again, isn&#039;t that what a life sentence is for?  Or the death penalty, if that&#039;s on the table?

Making up new limitations as we go changes &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law#Overview&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;the rule of law&quot; to &quot;the rule of men&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.  In that environment, we all stand to lose.


&quot;For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other.&quot;

- Thomas Paine]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems fueled by the kind of hysteria that&#8217;s become America&#8217;s most common response in the past decade or two.  So many developments are evoking fear-based responses.</p>
<p>This is not to say I&#8217;m throwing my hat in as &#8220;pedophile-friendly&#8221;.  Far from it.  But your post leads me to consider the question:</p>
<p>How many &#8220;classes&#8221; of citizens should there be?  Regular citizens and second-class-convicted-sentenced-served-and-released citizens?  Will the constitutional guarantees be different for each class?  I guess legally this may indeed be the case.  Should it be?</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the actual sentences convey the explicit and complete penalty assigned by the law?  Maybe they do for sexual abuse in most states.  I don&#8217;t know for sure.  I&#8217;d be much happier with a system that spelled out exactly what rights will be forfeited when a person is convicted of a crime.  If we want the convicted to never interact with society again, isn&#8217;t that what a life sentence is for?  Or the death penalty, if that&#8217;s on the table?</p>
<p>Making up new limitations as we go changes <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law#Overview" rel="nofollow">&#8220;the rule of law&#8221; to &#8220;the rule of men&#8221;</a>.  In that environment, we all stand to lose.</p>
<p>&#8220;For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other.&#8221;</p>
<p>- Thomas Paine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
